Any tech breakthrough is almost always a joint effort. To add a single feature to an iPhone app, teams of front-end engineers, user experience designers and graphic designers must work with cybersecurity specialists, back-end developers and iOS developers — just for starters. That means that today’s best engineers are prodigious collaborators and communicators. And yet we still train too many prospective coders to work alone.
From their first day in the classroom, computer-science students are nudged to value individual successes over team victories. Most assignments are completed and submitted solo.
While liberal arts majors are drilled in methods of communication, and vocational programs like business and medicine feature tons of group work, many computer science programs prize technical output over so-called “soft skills” such as collaboration and communication. Conflict resolution and critical thinking get short shrift.
Computer-science classes are among the most likely to grade students on a curve, which pits classmates against each other, ensuring that one student’s success has the potential to lower another student’s grade; this approach has been found to deter female students in particular.
The deepening shortage of computer-science professors has led many programs to adopt “competitive enrollment” models, which make introductory classes even more cutthroat, making students believe they must compete to stay in the major.
Even when students want to work together, they are often deterred by strict policies that consider collaboration to be cheating.
Yet students who learn through “pair programming,” in which two programmers work together at one computer, earn higher grades, create stronger projects, and display higher levels of satisfaction with their computer-science classes.
The benefits of pair programming are particularly pronounced for women: In one study, women who coded in pairs during an introductory course earned higher grades, were 36.8 percent more likely to major in computer science, reported greater levels of confidence in their solutions, and enjoyed the programming process more than women who did not work in pairs.
Another study found that working in pairs increased women’s confidence by 24 percentage points, compared with a 15 point increase for men.
Students who did not grow up coding at home or learning computer science in school benefit most from the engagement, social ties and active learning that arise from collaborative work.
Perhaps if collaborative learning did not remain so rare in coding education, the field could improve its dismal diversity record: Computer and mathematical occupations in the US are just 25 percent women, 8.4 percent black, and 7.5 percent Latinx. Those numbers are even worse in many top firms, where black and Latinx coders report feelings of isolation and often represent just 3 to 6 percent of employees.
Meanwhile, employers consistently find their new hires to be proficient coders, but struggling collaborators.
While the vast majority of employers value essential “soft skills” even more highly than a candidate’s college major, hiring managers place communication and problem-solving skills among the top-five competencies computer-science students are missing.
The results can be seen in Silicon Valley’s individualistic culture, in which engineers struggle for power within their teams and even refuse colleagues’ input for fear of losing sole credit for their work.
Code reviews are supposed to be opportunities to workshop issues, but instead become contests for recognition. When new team members have questions, they are told to “RTFM” or “read the fine manual.”
Every time a coder fails to offer direction to a colleague, the industry loses out.
When we tell prospective engineers that individual victories are the only kind worth winning, we set them up to enter the workplace as competent coders, but poor collaborators. We squeeze out coders who do not see themselves in the image of lone wolf inventor. The industry cannot afford to lose out on that potential.
Nathan Esquenazi is a former start-up entrepreneur now serving as cofounder and chief technology officer at CodePath.org, a nonprofit working to increase diversity in tech.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Among the rows of vibrators, rubber torsos and leather harnesses at a Chinese sex toys exhibition in Shanghai this weekend, the beginnings of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven shift in the industry quietly pulsed. China manufactures about 70 percent of the world’s sex toys, most of it the “hardware” on display at the fair — whether that be technicolor tentacled dildos or hyper-realistic personalized silicone dolls. Yet smart toys have been rising in popularity for some time. Many major European and US brands already offer tech-enhanced products that can enable long-distance love, monitor well-being and even bring people one step closer to
Malaysia’s leader yesterday announced plans to build a massive semiconductor design park, aiming to boost the Southeast Asian nation’s role in the global chip industry. A prominent player in the semiconductor industry for decades, Malaysia accounts for an estimated 13 percent of global back-end manufacturing, according to German tech giant Bosch. Now it wants to go beyond production and emerge as a chip design powerhouse too, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. “I am pleased to announce the largest IC (integrated circuit) Design Park in Southeast Asia, that will house world-class anchor tenants and collaborate with global companies such as Arm [Holdings PLC],”
TRANSFORMATION: Taiwan is now home to the largest Google hardware research and development center outside of the US, thanks to the nation’s economic policies President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday attended an event marking the opening of Google’s second hardware research and development (R&D) office in Taiwan, which was held at New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋). This signals Taiwan’s transformation into the world’s largest Google hardware research and development center outside of the US, validating the nation’s economic policy in the past eight years, she said. The “five plus two” innovative industries policy, “six core strategic industries” initiative and infrastructure projects have grown the national industry and established resilient supply chains that withstood the COVID-19 pandemic, Tsai said. Taiwan has improved investment conditions of the domestic economy
Sales in the retail, and food and beverage sectors last month continued to rise, increasing 0.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively from a year earlier, setting record highs for the month of March, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday. Sales in the wholesale sector also grew last month by 4.6 annually, mainly due to the business opportunities for emerging applications related to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing technologies, the ministry said in a report. The ministry forecast that retail, and food and beverage sales this month would retain their growth momentum as the former would benefit from Tomb Sweeping Day