Sun, Sep 01, 2019 - Page 16 News List

The ‘brilliant jerks’ from Silicon Valley might simply be jerks

By Shira Ovide  /  Bloomberg Opinion

Former Google and Uber engineer Anthony Levandowski leaves the federal court after his arraignment hearing in a trade secrets theft case in San Jose, California, on Tuesday.

Photo: Reuters

Silicon Valley has a split personality about “brilliant jerks.” These are the kind of abrasive, boundary-pushing executives whom the industry, and often the media, lionizes — until they push the boundaries too far and are kicked out of the tech Garden of Eden.

Consider Anthony Levandowski, a former executive in Alphabet Inc’s self-driving vehicle project whom the US government charged this week with stealing the company’s trade secrets.

Alphabet’s Google for years enabled and rewarded Levandowski as he flouted company rules and government regulations.

Levandowski formed several start-ups on the side while he worked at Google and then sold them to the company. He lobbied for driverless vehicle legislation in Nevada without telling his bosses, and sidestepped the permissions required to test autonomous vehicles on public roads.

Levandowski thrived with actions that would have gotten most employees fired — until his boundary-pushing involved pilfering Alphabet documents on his way to start his own autonomous-vehicle company and quickly selling it to Uber Technologies Inc, according to the indictment.

After that, Alphabet’s Waymo driverless vehicle unit sued Uber in connection with the actions of its former golden boy, and Alphabet provided documents and other ammunition for the government’s criminal case against Levandowski.

He pleaded not guilty.

His attorney said that Levandowski did not steal anything and that prosecutors rehashed “discredited” claims from the lawsuit that Waymo and Uber settled last year.

People like Levandowski, former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, former Zenefits cofounder Parker Conrad, Theranos Inc founder Elizabeth Holmes and Playground Global founder Andy Rubin, are regarded as scrappy, visionary entrepreneurs, until they go too far, receive unwanted attention or someone with power — or courage — stands up to them.

After that, they are sometimes seen as outliers and monsters who sully the tech industry’s reputation.

Yet can it truly be a surprise that if rule-breaking executives are lauded and rewarded for this behavior, they might at some point break rules to the point of stealing from the company, misleading board members, obtaining medical records about a rape victim, orchestrating a massive fraud or committing sexual misconduct against a coworker?

If people have evidence that normal rules do not apply to them, it seems natural that they could exploit that permissiveness.

That is exactly what some Google employees have been saying about a culture that they contend repeatedly protected executives accused of misconduct at work.

On Wednesday, Jennifer Blakely, a former manager in Google’s legal department, described what she said was the aftermath of a sexual relationship with David Drummond, Alphabet’s top lawyer.

She was required to transfer out of the legal department, and Blakely said she believed Drummond at one point sought custody of their child as payback for her request for financial support or interaction with their son.

Drummond did not reply to an e-mail seeking comment, Bloomberg News reported.

Sidestepping conventions can sometimes make a good company great or push along a nascent technology product.

The question is whether the benefits of a boundary-pushing culture outweigh the Levandowski and Drummond-type examples of harm from tolerating or applauding bad behavior from a chosen few.

This story has been viewed 2563 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top