On a busy day, contract employees in India monitoring nudity and pornography on Facebook and Instagram will each view 2,000 posts in an eight-hour shift, or almost four per minute.
They are part of a 1,600-member team at Genpact Ltd, an outsourcing firm with offices in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad that is contracted to review Facebook content.
Seven content reviewers at Genpact said in interviews late last year and early this year that their work was underpaid, stressful and sometimes traumatic.
The reviewers, all in their 20s, declined to be identified for fear of losing their jobs or breaching nondisclosure agreements. Three of the seven have left Genpact in the past few months.
“I have seen women employees breaking down on the floor, reliving the trauma of watching suicides real-time,” one former employee said, adding that he had seen this happen at least three times.
Reuters was unable to independently verify the incidents or determine how often they might have occurred.
Genpact declined comment.
The working conditions described by the employees offer a window into the moderator operations at Facebook Inc and the challenges faced by the company as it seeks to police what its 2 billion users post.
Their accounts contrast in several respects with the image presented by three Facebook executives in interviews and statements of a carefully selected, skilled workforce that is paid well and has the tools to handle a difficult job.
Facebook vice president of operations Ellen Silver acknowledged that content moderation “at this size is uncharted territory.”
“We care deeply about getting this right,” she said in January. “This includes the training reviewers receive, our hiring practices, the wellness resources that we provide to each and every person reviewing content, and our overall engagement with partners.”
While rejecting the Hyderabad employees’ assertions about low pay, Facebook has said that it had begun drafting a code of conduct for outsourcing partners, but declined to give details.
It has also said that it would be introducing an annual compliance audit of its vendor policies this year to review the work at contractor facilities.
The company is organizing a first-ever summit next month to bring together its outsourcing vendors from around the world, with the aim of sharing best practices and bringing more consistency to how moderators are treated.
These efforts were announced in a blogpost on Monday by Facebook vice president of global operations Justin Osofsky.
Facebook works with at least five outsourcing vendors in at least eight countries on content review, a Reuters tally showed.
About 15,000 people, a mix of contractors and employees at more than 20 content review sites worldwide, were working on content review at Facebook as of December last year, Silver said.
More than a dozen moderators in other parts of the world have talked of similar traumatic experiences.
A former Facebook contract employee, Selena Scola, filed a lawsuit in California in September last year, alleging that content moderators who face mental trauma after reviewing distressing images on the platform are not being properly protected by the social networking company.
Facebook in a court filing has denied all of Scola’s allegations and called for a dismissal, contending that Scola has insufficient grounds to sue.
Some examples of traumatic experiences among Facebook content moderators in the US were described this week by technology news Web site The Verge.
The Genpact unit in Hyderabad reviews posts in Indian languages, Arabic, English and some Afghan and Asian tribal dialects, Facebook said.
On one team, employees spend their days reviewing nudity and explicit pornography.
Meanwhile, the “counterterrorism” team watches videos that include beheadings, car bombings and electric shock torture sessions, the employees said.
Those on the “self-harm” unit regularly watch live videos of suicide attempts — and do not always succeed in alerting authorities in time, two of the employees said, adding that they had no experience with suicide or trauma.
Facebook said that its policies called for moderators to alert a “specially trained team” to review situations where there was “potential imminent risk or harm.”
The moderators who spoke to reporters said that in the instances they knew of, the trained team was called in when there was a possibility of a suicide, but the reviewers continued to monitor the feed even after the team had been alerted.
Job postings and salary pay slips seen by reporters showed that annual compensation at Genpact for an entry-level Facebook Arabic-language content reviewer was 100,000 Indian rupees (US$1,409) annually, or just more than US$6 per day.
Facebook contended that benefits made the real pay much higher.
The workers said that they did receive transportation to and from work, a common noncash benefit in India.
Moderators in Hyderabad employed by another information technology outsourcing firm, Accenture PLC, monitor Arabic content on YouTube on behalf of Google for a minimum of 350,000 rupees annually, according to two of its workers and pay slips seen by reporters.
Accenture declined to comment, citing client confidentiality.
Facebook disputed the pay analysis, saying that Genpact is required to pay more than industry averages.
The outsourcer, while declining to comment on its work for Facebook, said in a statement that its wages are “significantly higher than the standard in the industry or the minimum wage set by law.”
The Genpact moderators in Hyderabad said that Facebook sets performance targets, which are reassessed periodically, that are called “average review time” or “average handling time.”
“We have to meet an accuracy rate of 98 percent on massive targets,” one of the moderators told reporters. “It is just not easy when you are consistently bombarded with stuff that is mostly mind-numbing.”
CLIENTS’ RIGHTS: Banking Bureau Deputy Director-General Lin Chih-chi said the buyer and Citibank Taiwan would need to disclose changes to branch operations DBS Bank Taiwan (星展台灣), the local unit of Singapore-based DBS Group Holdings Ltd, has reportedly won a bid to acquire Citibank Taiwan Ltd’s (花旗台灣) consumer banking business, but the two companies declined to confirm the report yesterday. Citibank Taiwan’s consumer banking business is to be sold for about NT$60 billion (US$2.17 billion) to DBS Taiwan, the Chinese-language Economic Daily News reported on Sunday. DBS Taiwan and its parent company are expediting the negotiations with the seller’s US-based parent company, while other local bidders, including Fubon Financial Holding Co (富邦金控) and Cathay Financial Holding Co (國泰金控), have dropped their bids, the report said. Citibank
Intel Corp yesterday said it has placed its first order with ASML Holding NV to purchase the semiconductor industry’s first TWINSCAN EXE: 5200 system, as the US chip giant aims to compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in advancing to 2-nanometer process technology. The Dutch semiconductor equipment maker’s TWINSCAN EXE:5200 system is an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) high-volume production system with a high numerical aperture (NA) that can produce 220 wafers per hour, more than the 150 wafers that its previous generation TWINSCAN EXE:5000 system can handle. ASML aims to launch the new system in 2024. ASML president and chief
MediaTek Inc (聯發科), the world’s biggest 5G chip supplier, saw its ranking rise by one notch to No. 7 last year among world semiconductor vendors, as it benefited from the rapid 5G smartphone uptake in China after Huawei Technologies Co (華為) was forced to exit the market, Gartner Inc said in a report yesterday. MediaTek’s revenue soared 58.8 percent to US$17.45 billion last year from US$10.99 billion in 2020, outpacing the global semiconductor industry’s growth of 25 percent, according to Gartner’s tally. That gave MediaTek a 3 percent market share. The Hsinchu-based chip company ranked No. 8 in 2020, behind Texas Instruments
Siltronic AG cast doubt on a planned US$5.3 billion takeover by GlobalWafers Co (環球晶圓), saying the German Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Action’s feedback so far was opaque and offered no clear resolution on how to win approval for the deal. During recent discussions, the companies did not receive any information as to whether and under which conditions a clearance for the takeover might be issued, the German company said in a regulatory filing on Friday following a news report on remedies the companies have offered. In the ministry’s view “in this case, a mitigation agreement is apparently not suitable