Economic growth is frequently thought of as the marriage of policy frameworks and market outcomes, with little consideration of path dependence and social preferences.
In China, examining those preferences and the costs they impose gives just as much insight into what has shaped the nation as a study of macro decisions.
Modern China is defined by the grandiosity of its vision. Consider the unceasing laying of high-speed rail, constant attempts to build Asia’s tallest building, or the urban technological dystopia represented by total surveillance.
Photo: AP
The colossal scale of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange building is a good example of the need to project an imposing edifice.
Chinese Communist Party leaders and technocrats face pressure to demonstrate material improvements, year in, year out, using big projects and capital infrastructure as tangible metrics.
In remaking a major nation, China started from a unique place, because there was almost no modern infrastructure that needed overhauling. Power grids, roads and ports were rudimentary or nonexistent even three decades ago: Everything is new.
For all the criticism of major US airports, they have proved durable. Los Angeles International Airport opened its doors in 1930 and the hub that later became JFK International Airport started life in 1948, just before the founding of modern China.
Across the Pacific, China discards or mothballs airports rather than renovating them. Shenzhen Baoan International Airport opened in 1991 and became one of the busiest hubs in the world.
In 2013, the original terminals were closed and replaced with a new section designed by world-famous architects. The slick design might attract headlines and drive GDP growth, but it is a terribly expensive development model.
Disposable investment is not limited to infrastructure: Real estate is much the same. By the Chinese government’s estimate, almost half of the current housing stock — or everything built before 1999 — is of such poor quality that it will need to be demolished. Again, this is the wrong model: Assets like housing and airports are designed to have longer lives than 20 to 30 years, or their cost becomes prohibitive.
Even cities reflect the social preferences of Chinese central planning. European towns, steeped in history, stress the preservation of the past and a character handed down from generation to generation. In China, there is little restraint on bulldozing historic homes and farmland to build factories or railways.
This usually reflects the will of technocrats, whereas Europe and the US have clear social preferences in targeting economic output, to say nothing of budget constraints.
The Chinese government sees building as a straightforward way to achieve output goals.
To cap the population in Beijing at about 23 million, the authorities announced the construction of an adjacent city, Xiongan, on agricultural and light-industrial land.
In the absence of budget limits, this costly plan was seen as preferable to relaxing population controls under the household registration system, hukou.
Renovation and reform, while frequently more efficient, seldom draw the headlines devoted to billions of yuan in investment to build a city from the ground.
Research has found that in many economies, male leaders tend to invest more in construction and infrastructure, while women favor health and education.
Just as Chinese real-estate buyers will pay a substantial premium for new over second-hand apartments, there is a clear bias — with a significant cost — in how China achieves growth targets.
Despite the rhetoric that quality matters more than quantity, there is scant evidence of that.
This development model is showing strains. Debt has built up rapidly to pay for infrastructure and real estate with an inadequate lifespan. Rapid depreciation will increase costs to pay for projects that need to be replaced, in many cases before they have even paid off borrowings.
Beijing fueled economic expansion with capital accumulation and debt as savings growth slowed. Now the slogans about shifting to quality must be made reality.
China needs to change its growth model to account for long-term financial sustainability, rather than just meeting construction targets.
Christopher Balding is a former associate professor of business and economics at the HSBC Business School in Shenzhen and author of Sovereign Wealth Funds: The New Intersection of Money and Power.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Among the rows of vibrators, rubber torsos and leather harnesses at a Chinese sex toys exhibition in Shanghai this weekend, the beginnings of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven shift in the industry quietly pulsed. China manufactures about 70 percent of the world’s sex toys, most of it the “hardware” on display at the fair — whether that be technicolor tentacled dildos or hyper-realistic personalized silicone dolls. Yet smart toys have been rising in popularity for some time. Many major European and US brands already offer tech-enhanced products that can enable long-distance love, monitor well-being and even bring people one step closer to
Malaysia’s leader yesterday announced plans to build a massive semiconductor design park, aiming to boost the Southeast Asian nation’s role in the global chip industry. A prominent player in the semiconductor industry for decades, Malaysia accounts for an estimated 13 percent of global back-end manufacturing, according to German tech giant Bosch. Now it wants to go beyond production and emerge as a chip design powerhouse too, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. “I am pleased to announce the largest IC (integrated circuit) Design Park in Southeast Asia, that will house world-class anchor tenants and collaborate with global companies such as Arm [Holdings PLC],”
TRANSFORMATION: Taiwan is now home to the largest Google hardware research and development center outside of the US, thanks to the nation’s economic policies President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday attended an event marking the opening of Google’s second hardware research and development (R&D) office in Taiwan, which was held at New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋). This signals Taiwan’s transformation into the world’s largest Google hardware research and development center outside of the US, validating the nation’s economic policy in the past eight years, she said. The “five plus two” innovative industries policy, “six core strategic industries” initiative and infrastructure projects have grown the national industry and established resilient supply chains that withstood the COVID-19 pandemic, Tsai said. Taiwan has improved investment conditions of the domestic economy
Sales in the retail, and food and beverage sectors last month continued to rise, increasing 0.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively from a year earlier, setting record highs for the month of March, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday. Sales in the wholesale sector also grew last month by 4.6 annually, mainly due to the business opportunities for emerging applications related to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing technologies, the ministry said in a report. The ministry forecast that retail, and food and beverage sales this month would retain their growth momentum as the former would benefit from Tomb Sweeping Day