Qualcomm Inc accused Apple Inc of lying to regulators to spur investigations of the chipmaker, and threatening it to cover up the use of inferior parts in some iPhones.
The world’s largest maker of smartphone semiconductors responded to a January lawsuit from Apple with counterclaims f late on Monday or damages, alleging the iPhone maker breached contractual pledges, mischaracterized their agreements and misrepresented facts.
“We were really stunned by some of the things that they included in their suit,” Qualcomm general counsel Don Rosenberg said. “This is our attempt to respond to some disturbing elements in their complaint.”
At the heart of the worsening standoff is a commercial dispute over how much Qualcomm is entitled to charge smartphone makers to use its patented technology, whether or not they use its chips.
The San Diego, California-based company gets the majority of its profit from licensing technology that covers the fundamentals of all modern mobile phone systems.
Qualcomm shares are down 12 percent since Apple sued on Jan. 20, wiping more than US$10 billion off the chipmaker’s market value.
Apple spokesman Josh Rosenstock declined to comment on the filing, saying the company’s lawsuit explains its position on the matter.
“We are extremely disappointed in the way Qualcomm is conducting its business with us and unfortunately after years of disagreement over what constitutes a fair and reasonable royalty we have no choice left but to turn to the courts,” Apple said in a Jan. 20 statement.
Apple is alone among major handset makers in not paying Qualcomm directly and has instead paid through contract manufacturers in Asia who build the iPhone.
It is now meddling in the legal agreements Qualcomm has with those suppliers, including Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), as it pressures the chipmaker to cut a more favorable deal on licensing fees, Rosenberg said.
According to Qualcomm, Apple is behind regulatory investigations of its business practices worldwide.
Cupertino, California-based Apple has lobbied with “false and misleading statements to induce regulators to take action against us because it would be in their commercial interests,” Rosenberg said.
In December last year, South Korea’s antitrust regulator slapped a record 1.03 trillion won (US$899 million at the current exchange rate) fine on Qualcomm for violating antitrust laws.
Then, in January, the US Federal Trade Commission accused it in a lawsuit of forcing Apple to use its chips exclusively in return for lower licensing fees and unfairly cutting out competitors. It is also facing investigations in Taiwan and Europe.
Apple filed its antitrust complaint on Jan. 20 in Qualcomm’s hometown of San Diego, accusing the chipmaker of illegally trying to control the market for chips and improperly withholding more than US$1 billion in “rebates” to punish the iPhone-maker for talking to South Korean regulators.
Apple sought to have its case joined with one filed by the US Federal Trade Commission in northern California.
The commission has also accused Qualcomm of illegally maintaining a monopoly for semiconductors in mobile phones.
Apple’s request was denied on Wednesday.
Qualcomm is now trying to have the commission’s case dismissed.
In addition to the US$1 billion in withheld fees, Apple is seeking billions more in compensation for what it calls past overcharges, and lower royalties going forward.
Qualcomm says Apple has soured a decade worth of working together and has threatened it to try to prevent it from publicly speaking about the performance of the iPhone 7.
Some models of that device rely on Intel Corp modems for their connections to telephone networks and, according to Qualcomm, are not as good as the ones that use its modems.
“We didn’t ask for this fight. Apple is a customer,” Rosenberg said. “We, of course, would like to continue to and will continue to do business with Apple.”
While Apple’s iPhone revolutionized the smartphone industry in 2007 with its sleek design and user-friendly apps, none of them would have worked without the foundational technology developed by Qualcomm and other companies, Rosenberg said.
He said Qualcomm gets “a small fraction” of the price of an iPhone, and contrasted that with the more than US$1 billion Apple sought from rival Samsung Electronics Co over the use of patented features like a pinching motion to expand or contract images.
ISSUES: Gogoro has been struggling with ballooning losses and was recently embroiled in alleged subsidy fraud, using Chinese-made components instead of locally made parts Gogoro Inc (睿能創意), the nation’s biggest electric scooter maker, yesterday said that its chairman and CEO Horace Luke (陸學森) has resigned amid chronic losses and probes into the company’s alleged involvement in subsidy fraud. The board of directors nominated Reuntex Group (潤泰集團) general counsel Tamon Tseng (曾夢達) as the company’s new chairman, Gogoro said in a statement. Ruentex is Gogoro’s biggest stakeholder. Gogoro Taiwan general manager Henry Chiang (姜家煒) is to serve as acting CEO during the interim period, the statement said. Luke’s departure came as a bombshell yesterday. As a company founder, he has played a key role in pushing for the
China has claimed a breakthrough in developing homegrown chipmaking equipment, an important step in overcoming US sanctions designed to thwart Beijing’s semiconductor goals. State-linked organizations are advised to use a new laser-based immersion lithography machine with a resolution of 65 nanometers or better, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said in an announcement this month. Although the note does not specify the supplier, the spec marks a significant step up from the previous most advanced indigenous equipment — developed by Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment Group Co (SMEE, 上海微電子) — which stood at about 90 nanometers. MIIT’s claimed advances last
CROSS-STRAIT TENSIONS: The US company could switch orders from TSMC to alternative suppliers, but that would lower chip quality, CEO Jensen Huang said Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), whose products have become the hottest commodity in the technology world, on Wednesday said that the scramble for a limited amount of supply has frustrated some customers and raised tensions. “The demand on it is so great, and everyone wants to be first and everyone wants to be most,” he told the audience at a Goldman Sachs Group Inc technology conference in San Francisco. “We probably have more emotional customers today. Deservedly so. It’s tense. We’re trying to do the best we can.” Huang’s company is experiencing strong demand for its latest generation of chips, called
GLOBAL ECONOMY: Policymakers have a choice of a small 25 basis-point cut or a bold cut of 50 basis points, which would help the labor market, but might reignite inflation The US Federal Reserve is gearing up to announce its first interest rate cut in more than four years on Wednesday, with policymakers expected to debate how big a move to make less than two months before the US presidential election. Senior officials at the US central bank including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell have in recent weeks indicated that a rate cut is coming this month, as inflation eases toward the bank’s long-term target of two percent, and the labor market continues to cool. The Fed, which has a dual mandate from the US Congress to act independently to ensure