Wed, Mar 29, 2017 - Page 12 News List

Report details Taiwan, S Korea export gap

HEADWINDS:Accelerating world trade growth and more competitive regional rivals, such as Cambodia, Myanmar and Laos, will make competition for market share fierce

Bloomberg

South Korean workers’ wages are rising faster than those of regional rivals and the power of the nation’s sprawling family-run conglomerates, or chaebols, remains unchecked, highlighting a lack of serious economic reform. Yet, manufacturing exports are booming.

Taiwan’s labor costs are cheap and its effective exchange rate far more competitive, yet overseas shipments have been flailing.

The divergence, set out in an Oxford Economics report, deepens given the similar export mixes of the two developed economies — indeed, an indicator of trade similarity stands at 0.67, high given that 1.0 represents an identical mix.

The two also essentially ship goods to the same markets. Yet, South Korean export volume surged 5.3 percent yearly from 2010 to last year, compared with just 1.4 percent for Taiwan.

The difference is the extent to which South Korean companies have moved up the value chain and developed global brands, especially in the electronics and auto manufacturing industries, Oxford Economics senior economist Oliver Salmon said.

“Taiwan hosts many technologically sophisticated companies, especially in semiconductors and electronics, but few true global brands,” Salmon said, contrasting Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) with Samsung Electronics Co. “In part, this is because Taiwan is handicapped by its relatively low profile and uncertain status.”

South Korea has also forged ahead with free-trade accords.

Oxford Economics said that since signing a deal with the US, average tariffs have fallen from 3.8 percent in 2011 to 0.4 percent in 2015.

That underpinned growth in merchandise exports to the US of 3.4 percent per year in nominal US dollar terms through last year. In contrast, Taiwanese exports over the same period fell 1.7 percent a year.

Taiwan was among the losers in Oxford Economics’ survey of Asian economies’ trading performances since the 2008 global financial crisis.

Most in this category were relatively developed — Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand and Singapore — and lost manufacturing to regional competitors as their costs climbed without offsetting gains in innovation or productivity.

Singapore was particularly hard hit. Its electronics exports have slumped by one-third since 2010. Part of the explanation is stricter controls on migrant workers since 2010 that tightened the labor market and resulted in nominal wages in manufacturing surging 20 percent in US dollar terms through 2015.

However, while wages rose, productivity stagnated, resulting in unit labor costs climbing faster than in any other developed Asian economy in the survey.

Meanwhile, Malaysia and the Philippines have picked up the slack, spurred by cheaper production and increasing foreign investment.

India, in turn, has benefited from its cheap labor and a low base of comparison to work off.

Thailand has also struggled to adapt to increasing competition from regional rivals, particularly in labor-intensive manufacturing, with the emergence of the “CMLV [Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam] group of economies in ASEAN,” the survey said.

Oxford Economics predicted that world trade growth will accelerate to 3.5 percent this year and to 4 percent by 2020, which is still below the long-term average of almost 5 percent.

As a result, competition for market share “will be fierce,” it said, adding that medium-term forecasts of winners and losers in Asia should broadly mirror the recent past.

This story has been viewed 4141 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top