An advertising boycott of YouTube LLC is broadening, a sign that big-spending companies doubt Google’s ability to prevent marketing campaigns from appearing alongside repugnant videos.
PepsiCo Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Starbucks Corp on Friday confirmed that they have also suspended their advertising on YouTube after the Wall Street Journal found Google’s automated programs placed their brands on five videos containing racist content.
AT&T Inc, Verizon Communications Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Volkswagen AG and other companies pulled ads earlier this week.
The defections are continuing even after Google apologized for tainting brands and outlined steps to ensure ads do not appear alongside unsavory videos.
It is not an easy problem to fix, even for a company with the brainpower that Google has drawn upon to build a search engine that billions trust to find the information they want in a matter of seconds.
Google depends mostly on automated programs to place ads in YouTube videos, because the job is too much for humans to handle on their own. About 400 hours of video is now posted on YouTube each minute.
The company has pledged to hire more people to review videos and develop even more sophisticated programs to teach its computers to figure out which clips would be considered to be too despicable for advertising.
Contacted on Friday, Google stood by its earlier promise, signaling the company’s confidence that it will be able to placate advertisers.
As part of that effort, Google intends to block more objectionable videos from ever being posted on YouTube — an effort that could spur complaints about censorship.
Some outraged advertisers are making it clear that they will not return to YouTube until they are certain Google has the situation under control.
“The content with which we are being associated is appalling and completely against our company values,” Wal-Mart said in a statement.
Besides suspending their spending on YouTube, Wal-Mart, PepsiCo Inc and several other companies have said they will stop buying ads that Google places on more than 2 million other third-party Web sites.
If Google cannot lure back advertisers, it could result in a loss of hundreds of millions of US dollars in revenue.
However, most analysts doubt the ad boycott will seriously hurt Google’s corporate parent, Alphabet Inc.
Although they have been growing rapidly, YouTube’s ads still only represent a relatively small financial piece of Alphabet, whose revenue last year totaled US$73.5 billion after subtracting commissions paid to Google’s partners.
YouTube accounted for US$5.6 billion, or nearly 8 percent, of that total, based on estimates from research firm eMarketer Inc.
At most, RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Mahaney said he expects the YouTube ad boycott to trim Alphabet’s net revenue by about 2 percent this year.
Moody’s Investor Service predicted that the backlash would not last long, because Google is “laser-focused” on cleaning things up on YouTube.
Alphabet’s stock price has fallen nearly 4 percent since the boycott began last week after an investigation by British newspaper the Times revealed the ads of major brands were appearing in YouTube videos delving into contentious themes.
Alphabet shares on Friday fell US$4.51 to close at US$835.14.
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US
CORPORATE SCANDAL: Cathay Life has invested NT$13.3 billion in Bank Mayapada since 2015, but the latest loss of NT$8.8 billion has completely written off its investment Cathay Life Insurance Co (國泰人壽) yesterday said it would recognize an investment loss of NT$8.8 billion (US$298.1 million) in Indonesia’s Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk PT due to concerns about the lender’s operations amid a corporate scandal. The company said it would revise its earnings result for June, from a net profit of NT$6.52 billion to a net loss of NT$520 million, its first monthly loss over the past 17 months. After booking an investment loss of NT$5.2 billion in Bank Mayapada earlier this year, Cathay Life has so far recognized total investment losses of NT$14 billion in the lender, executive vice president
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported that revenue last month expanded 25 percent annually, but fell 12.8 percent month-on-month to NT$105.96 billion (US$3.59 billion). In the first seven months of this year, the chipmaker’s revenue surged 33.6 percent to NT$727.26 billion, compared with NT$544.46 billion a year earlier. TSMC has said it aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year. The company has since May 15 stopped taking new orders from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), its second-biggest customer after Apple Inc, due to the US’ restrictions on exports containing US technologies. TSMC has no plans to
The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality? The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors. The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable