Qualcomm Inc yesterday said it has been licensing its patents almost at the same rates since the licensing program started three decades ago to help introduce innovative technologies, defending its role in recent competition probes around the globe.
Qualcomm, which supplies chips to Apple Inc’s iPhone series and handsets from Taiwan’s HTC Corp (宏達電) and Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), made the comments as it faces a slew of probes launched by global competition watchdogs over concerns that the US company’s licensing practices might hamper market competition.
Qualcomm settled one case with the Chinese government about 18 months ago by slashing licensing fees by 35 percent for Chinese firms and other companies that sell goods containing Qualcomm’s chips. Qualcomm also agreed to pay a fine of US$975 million imposed by Chinese authorities.
Photo: Lisa Wang, Taipei Times
Even so, Qualcomm is “not a monopoly,” Qualcomm chief legal officer Donald Rosenberg told a small group of reporters from Taiwan at the company’s headquarters in San Diego, California, on Wednesday. “Our general royalty rates have not changed from when we started to now. We haven’t raised them, even though we added to that portfolio of patents by thousands of thousands.”
“When we charge our license, it will be fair, reasonable and non-discriminate. We have done that for 30 years,” Rosenberg said.
The royalty terms that Qualcomm mostly uses today are based on the company’s negotiation outcome dating back to 1992 with then-industry giants Motorola and AT&T, said Fabian Gonell, a senior vice president of Qualcomm’s counsel division.
Photo: Lisa Wang, Taipei Times
Since then, Qualcomm has been charging 5 percent of the selling price of a complete device, or mobile phone, Gonell said.
Taiwan’s Fair Trade commission in December last year opened an investigation into Qualcomm’s patent licensing practices as the regulator was concerned about whether Qualcomm “hampers market competition by abusing its dominance,” commission spokesman Chiu Yung-ho (邱永和) said by telephone yesterday.
Chiu said the commission has requested Qualcomm to submit related information for clarification, adding that the probe is large in scale and will take time to collect sufficient information to make a ruling.
“We believe that our licensing practices are fair and they are good not just for Qualcomm, but for the entire industry,” Gonell said.
“In Taiwan, we don’t know what the key issues are, or what the fair commission is interested in... We are still in the early stage,” Gonell said.
However, Gonell rejected reports that South Korean and Taiwanese authorities have requested Qualcomm to change its royalty model basing on chip prices, rather than the price of a complete device.
Poland is betting on a flood of investments and technology transfers from Taiwanese companies to reengineer its US$1 trillion economy. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said yesterday that Poland will no longer be “just an assembly hub” as it pursues further investments from the likes of Foxconn Technology Group (富士康). The firm, whose full name is Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), last month agreed to build electric vehicles (EVs) in the European Union nation and now could be a partner in a semiconductor venture, he said. The government’s aim is to boost manufacturing and the country’s high-tech chops in an era
Taiwan remained the sixth-largest net creditor nation in the world last year, despite a fall of more than 10 percent in its net international investment position (NIIP) over the year, the central bank said yesterday. The NIIP is the difference between a country’s external financial assets and its external financial liabilities. Taiwan’s external financial assets hit US$3.27 trillion at the end of last year, up US$275.75 billion or 9.2 percent from a year earlier, the central bank said in its annual NIIP report. The growth largely reflected an increase in holdings of overseas marketable securities by residents in Taiwan, as well as a
BAD FAITH LITIGATION? The two companies, owned by a California-based private equity firm, could be seeking licensing fees or a settlement payout with the suit Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Director-General Liao Cheng-wei (廖承威) said yesterday he suspected that two firms suing contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) for patent infringement are “patent trolls.” A patent troll refers to a company that buys patents not for manufacturing products, but to sue other companies for compensation, accusing them of using its patents. Patent trolls, formally called Non-Practicing Entities or Patent Assertion Entities, were responsible for more than 50 percent of lawsuits in the US last year, costing targeted businesses tens of billions of US dollars a year, according to the US-based LegalCharity Web site. Asked whether
RESTRICTION BREACH: ASML said that it denies ‘unfounded rumors regarding non-compliance with export controls concerning China,’ and enforces controls strictly US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in a series of recent meetings outlined concerns to Dutch chip-equipment giant ASML Holding NV’s senior leaders that one of its top-of-the-line machines might have made its way into China, in violation of US-led export restrictions. In the meetings, Lutnick expressed concern to ASML executives over the company’s extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines, people familiar with the talks said. EUV systems are used by firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) to manufacture processors for the likes of Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc. ASML has never been allowed to ship them to China because of curbs
RSS