The US slapped new import duties on solar panels and other related products from China on Tuesday after the US Department of Commerce ruled they were produced using Chinese government subsidies, potentially inflaming trade tensions between the two countries.
The US arm of German solar manufacturer SolarWorld AG filed a petition complaining that Chinese manufacturers are sidestepping duties imposed in 2012 by shifting production of the cells used to make their panels to Taiwan and continuing to flood the US market with cheap products.
The new complaint seeks to close that loophole by extending import duties to also cover panels made with parts from Taiwan.
Photo: Reuters
In a preliminary determination, the Department of Commerce imposed duties of 35.21 percent on imports of panels and other products made by Wuxi Suntech Power Holdings Co (無錫尚德) and five other affiliated companies, 18.56 percent on imports of Trina Solar Ltd (天合光能) and 26.89 percent on imports from other Chinese producers.
A preliminary decision on the anti-dumping section of the complaint is due by July 25. That section covers panels assembled in China from Taiwanese inputs or third-country cells made from Chinese inputs.
The anti-subsidy duties will hurt the Chinese solar industry, although the overall impact should be limited given the US accounted for just about 10 percent of Chinese solar shipments last year, industry officials and analysts say.
The Chinese government, which has been scrambling to boost domestic demand to offset declines in orders from Europe — previously the dominant buyer of Chinese solar products — yesterday expressed its “strong dissatisfaction” with the US decision.
In a notice posted on its Web site, China’s Ministry of Commerce said the US had “ignored the facts” and abused trade rules in order to protect its own industry, adding that the use of trade measures “would not solve the development problems of the US solar industry.”
China retaliated against the original US duties by introducing anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on imports of US polysilicon, the key raw material in solar cells, and has accused the US of trying to curb Chinese imports.
In the US, the complaint has pitted SolarWorld Industries America, which makes crystalline silicon solar panels at its factory in Hillsboro, Oregon, against US solar companies that mainly focus on installation and who say imposing import duties will only push up the cost of solar power.
“The ruling is a major setback for the entire US solar industry because it will immediately increase the price of solar power and cost American jobs in one of fastest-growing sectors of the US economy,” the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy said.
The Solar Energy Industries Association said SolarWorld and Chinese manufacturers should try to settle the dispute before the industry was hurt.
However, SolarWorld said it is not fair that Chinese solar producers benefit from government aid from their own country, including discounted loans and free utilities, making it hard for US firms to compete.
“This is a strong win for SolarWorld and the domestic solar manufacturing industry,” said lawyer Tim Brightbill, from Wiley Rein LLP, representing SolarWorld.
Both the US Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC) have to issue final rulings in favor of SolarWorld before the duties are finalized.
Last year, Chinese imports of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells covered in the complaint, which typically form the basic element of solar panels and modules, were valued at an estimated US$1.5 billion, the Commerce Department said.
US solar installations were worth more than US$13 billion last year, according to research firm GTM. About half the solar equipment installed in the US last year was made in China. In the fast-growing rooftop solar market, that figure was 71 percent.
The value of imports of solar products from China fell by almost a third from 2012 to last year, while imports from Taiwan rose more than 40 percent, although from a much smaller base, according to ITC data.
Among the rows of vibrators, rubber torsos and leather harnesses at a Chinese sex toys exhibition in Shanghai this weekend, the beginnings of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven shift in the industry quietly pulsed. China manufactures about 70 percent of the world’s sex toys, most of it the “hardware” on display at the fair — whether that be technicolor tentacled dildos or hyper-realistic personalized silicone dolls. Yet smart toys have been rising in popularity for some time. Many major European and US brands already offer tech-enhanced products that can enable long-distance love, monitor well-being and even bring people one step closer to
Malaysia’s leader yesterday announced plans to build a massive semiconductor design park, aiming to boost the Southeast Asian nation’s role in the global chip industry. A prominent player in the semiconductor industry for decades, Malaysia accounts for an estimated 13 percent of global back-end manufacturing, according to German tech giant Bosch. Now it wants to go beyond production and emerge as a chip design powerhouse too, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. “I am pleased to announce the largest IC (integrated circuit) Design Park in Southeast Asia, that will house world-class anchor tenants and collaborate with global companies such as Arm [Holdings PLC],”
Sales in the retail, and food and beverage sectors last month continued to rise, increasing 0.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively from a year earlier, setting record highs for the month of March, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday. Sales in the wholesale sector also grew last month by 4.6 annually, mainly due to the business opportunities for emerging applications related to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing technologies, the ministry said in a report. The ministry forecast that retail, and food and beverage sales this month would retain their growth momentum as the former would benefit from Tomb Sweeping Day
Thousands of parents in Singapore are furious after a Cordlife Group Ltd (康盛人生集團), a major operator of cord blood banks in Asia, irreparably damaged their children’s samples through improper handling, with some now pursuing legal action. The ongoing case, one of the worst to hit the largely untested industry, has renewed concerns over companies marketing themselves to anxious parents with mostly unproven assurances. This has implications across the region, given Cordlife’s operations in Hong Kong, Macau, Indonesia, the Philippines and India. The parents paid for years to have their infants’ cord blood stored, with the understanding that the stem cells they contained