Taiwan Ratings Corp (中華信評), the local arm of Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, yesterday cut its outlook on Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp (奇美電子) as the economy threatens to cut deeper into the panel maker’s profitability in the short term.
Taiwan Ratings revised its outlook on Chi Mei, the nation’s second-largest flat panel maker, down to “negative” from “stable.”
“The outlook revision reflects our expectation that a sharp industry downturn, which was deepened by the global financial crisis, will continue to suppress Chi Mei’s profitability and weaken its credit protection measures,” Taiwan Ratings said in a report.
As there was no clear sign of a recovery in the upcoming two or three quarters, Taiwan Ratings said it may lower its long-term rating on Chi Mei as well.
The local ratings agency may take action if Chi Mei’s ratio of net debt to capital exceeds 50 percent or the company is unable to maintain its ratio of operational funds to net debt above 30 percent, the report said.
Chi Mei, based in Tainan, posted record third quarter losses of NT$4.2 billion (US$126.1 million) as panel prices plunged on oversupply and shrinking demand amid the economic turmoil.
Chi Mei’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization margin dropped to 16.6 percent in the third quarter this year, from 32.8 percent in the second quarter.
The company’s adjusted ratio of net debt to capital rose to 43.8 percent at the end of September, from 39 percent during the same period last year.
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US
CORPORATE SCANDAL: Cathay Life has invested NT$13.3 billion in Bank Mayapada since 2015, but the latest loss of NT$8.8 billion has completely written off its investment Cathay Life Insurance Co (國泰人壽) yesterday said it would recognize an investment loss of NT$8.8 billion (US$298.1 million) in Indonesia’s Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk PT due to concerns about the lender’s operations amid a corporate scandal. The company said it would revise its earnings result for June, from a net profit of NT$6.52 billion to a net loss of NT$520 million, its first monthly loss over the past 17 months. After booking an investment loss of NT$5.2 billion in Bank Mayapada earlier this year, Cathay Life has so far recognized total investment losses of NT$14 billion in the lender, executive vice president
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported that revenue last month expanded 25 percent annually, but fell 12.8 percent month-on-month to NT$105.96 billion (US$3.59 billion). In the first seven months of this year, the chipmaker’s revenue surged 33.6 percent to NT$727.26 billion, compared with NT$544.46 billion a year earlier. TSMC has said it aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year. The company has since May 15 stopped taking new orders from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), its second-biggest customer after Apple Inc, due to the US’ restrictions on exports containing US technologies. TSMC has no plans to
The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality? The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors. The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable