Sun, Jun 25, 2006 - Page 11 News List

Hedge fund ruling nixed

AP , WASHINGTON

In a setback to the Securities and Exchange Commission, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned a rule bringing hedge funds under new supervision by the agency.

The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sent the rule -- which bitterly divided the five-member SEC when it was adopted in October 2004 -- back to the agency to be reviewed.

Meanwhile, a major hedge fund that is under SEC investigation for possible insider trading denied that there was any improper activity by the fund.

"The trades at issue were made in the ordinary course of the firm's business and were entirely normal within the context of its daily investing activities," said Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for the hedge fund, Pequot Capital Management Inc.

The SEC rule for hedge funds, which are high-risk, largely unregulated and secretive investment pools, took effect on Feb. 1.

Hedge funds have traditionally been the investment domain of the wealthy but have become popular with smaller investors in recent years. Today some 7,000 hedge funds in the US command an estimated US$750 billion to US$1 trillion in assets and leave a wide footprint in the financial markets, as they are believed to account for as much as 20 percent of all US stock trading.

Regulators' concern about the funds' explosive growth and virtually unbridled operations prompted the SEC rule, which requires most hedge-fund managers to register with the agency. That opens the funds' books to SEC examiners.

But the appeals court, in its decision on Friday, called the SEC rule "arbitrary." The agency failed to make a compelling case for the necessity of the rule, the court said.

The SEC investigation of Pequot Capital came to light in a report on Friday by the New York Times that an SEC attorney who led the probe has told Congress he was blocked by superiors when he tried to question a prominent Wall Street executive.

This story has been viewed 2435 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top