The GDP -- the broad measure of output -- is the ultimate headline number for an economy. Everything from presidential election strategies to marketing plans for a new brand of shaving cream can hinge on the quarterly GDP figures.
Accordingly, economists on Wall Street, in corporate America and in academia spend much time plugging data into their meticulously designed models and producing precise forecasts. The Wall Street Journal, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the newsletter Blue Chip Indicators are just a few of the organizations that compile and publish their predictions. But their collective vision is so murky that it seems as if economists are looking into a tankard of pitch-black Guinness' Ale instead of a crystal ball.
At the end of last year, the 54 economists polled by The Wall Street Journal concluded that the GDP would grow at an annual rate of 4.5 percent in the first quarter this year. The number came in at 3.9 percent. The participants' calls ranged from the laughably low -- Edward Leamer of the University of California, Los Angeles, predicted 2.7 percent -- to the absurdly high. Brian Wesbury of Griffin, Kubik, Stephens & Thompson Inc and Lawrence Kudlow of Kudlow & Co -- supply-siders both -- predicted growth of 6.3 percent and 6.1 percent, respectively.
If Al Roker foretold the weather with such accuracy on the Today show, he might be relegated to a Sunday morning daybreak slot. (Kudlow is still co-host of a prime-time program on CNBC.)
And there is little consistency. John Lonski, chief economist at Moody's Inc. and the reigning champion of The Wall Street Journal's survey, has been substantially off base in some surveys.
"It's a bit disconcerting to note that for some reason you do not find individuals repeating with any frequency in the top spot among forecasts," he said.
Why can social scientists' forecasts go awry? "It's like driving ahead while looking in your mirror," said Gene Huang, chief economist at the Federal Express Corp.
The statistics that economists receive today often describe conditions from one or two months ago. What's more, many numbers -- including those for the GDP -- are routinely revised several times after they are issued.
But the data aren't the only problem. Economists, like most other humans, tend to forecast by extrapolating existing trends. That's fine when things tend to keep moving in the same direction. But when there is a shift, look out.
Two economists, James Stock of Harvard and Mark Watson of Princeton, found that professional forecasters surveyed by the Fed-eral Reserve Bank of Philadelphia had all the short-term vision of Mr. Magoo when the business cycle turned. In the fourth quarter of 2000, amid a long-running expansion, the three dozen economists in the survey projected that the economy would grow in the first quarter of 2001 at an annual rate of 3.3 percent; instead, it contracted at a 0.6 percent annual rate.
In the fourth quarter of 2001, they said the economy would grow at a 0.1 percent annual rate in the first quarter of 2002. Oops. The actual figure was 5 percent.
Acting on those forecasts would have left a business going full steam ahead when the bottom fell out, and idling while the economy was burning rubber.
Some economists say we shouldn't expect perfection.
"Over the long term what we as a profession can offer is consistently being pretty close most of the time," said Benjamin Herzon, senior economist at Macroeconomic Advisers, a consulting firm based in St. Louis.
But if that's the best they can do, why should we pay attention? Well, consensus forecasts tend to produce better results than individual ones. A study published last year by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta concluded that the Blue Chip forecast, on average, "performs better than any individual forecaster."
And Huang, a member of the WSJ panel, argues that consensus forecasts "serve as a collective wisdom of market perception."
Of course, the market isn't always right. Last month, the evidence was abundant, from lower job-creation figures to limp sales at Wal-Mart, that the economy's growth was slowing. But forecasters -- perhaps influenced by several quarters of decent growth -- collectively believe that the pace of the economy is accelerating.
The WSJ's 55 Nostradami believe that GDP will grow at an annual rate of 4.4 percent for the second and third quarters, and at a 4.2 percent clip in the fourth. The Philadelphia Fed crowd forecasts a 4.5 percent pace for the second quarter, and 4 percent in the second half of the year.
If economists are still looking in the rear-view mirror, it may be time to gently apply the brakes.
BUSINESS UPDATE: The iPhone assembler said operations outlook is expected to show quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year growth for the second quarter Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) yesterday reported strong growth in sales last month, potentially raising expectations for iPhone sales while artificial intelligence (AI)-related business booms. The company, which assembles the majority of Apple Inc’s smartphones, reported a 19.03 percent rise in monthly sales to NT$510.9 billion (US$15.78 billion), from NT$429.22 billion in the same period last year. On a monthly basis, sales rose 14.16 percent, it said. The company in a statement said that last month’s revenue was a record-breaking April performance. Hon Hai, known also as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), assembles most iPhones, but the company is diversifying its business to
Apple Inc has been developing a homegrown chip to run artificial intelligence (AI) tools in data centers, although it is unclear if the semiconductor would ever be deployed, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. The effort would build on Apple’s previous efforts to make in-house chips, which run in its iPhones, Macs and other devices, according to the Journal, which cited unidentified people familiar with the matter. The server project is code-named ACDC (Apple Chips in Data Center) within the company, aiming to utilize Apple’s expertise in chip design for the company’s server infrastructure, the newspaper said. While this initiative has been
GlobalWafers Co (環球晶圓), the world’s No. 3 silicon wafer supplier, yesterday said that revenue would rise moderately in the second half of this year, driven primarily by robust demand for advanced wafers used in high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips, a key component of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. “The first quarter is the lowest point of this cycle. The second half will be better than the first for the whole semiconductor industry and for GlobalWafers,” chairwoman Doris Hsu (徐秀蘭) said during an online investors’ conference. “HBM would definitely be the key growth driver in the second half,” Hsu said. “That is our big hope
The consumer price index (CPI) last month eased to 1.95 percent, below the central bank’s 2 percent target, as food and entertainment cost increases decelerated, helped by stable egg prices, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) said yesterday. The slowdown bucked predictions by policymakers and academics that inflationary pressures would build up following double-digit electricity rate hikes on April 1. “The latest CPI data came after the cost of eating out and rent grew moderately amid mixed international raw material prices,” DGBAS official Tsao Chih-hung (曹志弘) told a news conference in Taipei. The central bank in March raised interest rates by