With the hottest days of summer fast approaching, Shanghai is making preparations to seed clouds over the city in order to make it rain, in the hope that a couple of degrees of reduced temperatures will help ward off brownouts, or worse, here in China's commercial capital.
Even now, city inspection teams are visiting factories, identifying the least efficient energy consumers, possibly to be closed down for a time, and thermostats are being raised in public offices. City officials say they are even contemplating shutting down the huge flashing advertising signs that made the Bund, or downtown river front in Shanghai, China's largest city, the neon equivalent of Times Square.
With China projecting a 20-million-kilowatt shortfall in electricity supplies this year, actions like these are anything but isolated. With severe power shortages predicted for the country's southern and eastern regions, Guangzhou, China's third largest city, an industrial powerhouse, has had rationing since January, six months earlier than the emergency measures put into effect last year.
Discussions about China these days are often dominated by economic terms like "overheating," and "hard versus soft landings."
What is described as being at issue, typically, is whether the country's leaders can continue to successfully manage this huge and increasingly complex economy at growth rates that are among the world's fastest.
The rush to find short-term, sometimes even fanciful-sounding, palliatives for the country's immense power crunch, however, reflects creeping doubts of a more profound order. These concerns have recently been expressed even at the level of China's normally serene and self-confident-sounding senior officials.
The worry, put bluntly, is that the world simply may not have enough energy and other resources for China to continue developing along present lines, especially at its present rate. Furthermore, sharply increased environmental damage might make the country unlivable, even if such growth could be sustained.
China's predicament is reflected in a simple statistic: This country is already the world's second-largest consumer of energy, and yet on a per capita basis, the Chinese consume scarcely 10 percent of the energy used by Americans.
In material terms, the contemporary Chinese dream is not so different from the traditional American dream, of spacious homes full of power-consuming appliances and a car or two in the driveway, and therein lies the source of concern for the country's leaders -- and indeed for the world. As urbanization gathers pace here, there is a growing sense that such dreams will collide with intractable limits.
"If we use the patterns of today, China cannot double its economy," said Chen Jinhai, director of the Shanghai provincial government's Energy Commission and Environmental Protection Department. "We would need the energy of Mars or other planets. Our consumption may still be less than the U.S. or Japan, but the key for our future will have to be greater efficiency."
Chen is far from a lone voice speaking about the severe environmental and resource limitations that will challenge this country's seemingly irresistible rise of late. Indeed, his perspective echoes that of senior policy makers in Beijing.
"If we continue with the massive consumption of resources, shortages will only get worse, it will become very hard to maintain stable, high-speed growth, and the economy risks declining greatly," wrote Ma Kai, director of the State Development and Reform Commission, in a sobering recent article in People's Daily, the Communist Party newspaper. "Now we are at a key point in the industrialization and urbanization process. If we don't transform our economic model, we could lose the ability to grow."
According to Zhang Jun, a prominent Chinese economist who has made a comparative study of China and India, China consumes three times the energy and 15 times the amount of steel as its neighbor, even though the Chinese economy is only roughly twice as large, and is growing only about 10 percent faster than India's.
Part of this picture comes from an intensive focus on manufacturing and exports, which many economists say has led to over-industrialization and empty growth. A lot of the responsibility for wastefulness can be laid to duplication, with each province -- and indeed many city governments -- simultaneously pushing for the same kind of growth, based on industrial parks and manufacturing zones. The municipalities that boast of becoming China's Silicon Valley, to take one common example of this trend, are almost too numerous to count.
"China will definitely be facing a huge, huge challenge in a decade or so if the growth patterns don't change," said Zhang, who is the director of the China Center for Economic Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai. "Ours is an extreme case of the East Asian model, and we are coming quickly toward the limitations in terms of the way we use energy, in terms of the environment, and even in terms of labor."
SEMICONDUCTOR SERVICES: A company executive said that Taiwanese firms must think about how to participate in global supply chains and lift their competitiveness Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said it expects to launch its first multifunctional service center in Pingtung County in the middle of 2027, in a bid to foster a resilient high-tech facility construction ecosystem. TSMC broached the idea of creating a center two or three years ago when it started building new manufacturing capacity in the US and Japan, the company said. The center, dubbed an “ecosystem park,” would assist local manufacturing facility construction partners to upgrade their capabilities and secure more deals from other global chipmakers such as Intel Corp, Micron Technology Inc and Infineon Technologies AG, TSMC said. It
EXPORT GROWTH: The AI boom has shortened chip cycles to just one year, putting pressure on chipmakers to accelerate development and expand packaging capacity Developing a localized supply chain for advanced packaging equipment is critical for keeping pace with customers’ increasingly shrinking time-to-market cycles for new artificial intelligence (AI) chips, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) said yesterday. Spurred on by the AI revolution, customers are accelerating product upgrades to nearly every year, compared with the two to three-year development cadence in the past, TSMC vice president of advanced packaging technology and service Jun He (何軍) said at a 3D IC Global Summit organized by SEMI in Taipei. These shortened cycles put heavy pressure on chipmakers, as the entire process — from chip design to mass
Germany is to establish its first-ever national pavilion at Semicon Taiwan, which starts tomorrow in Taipei, as the country looks to raise its profile and deepen semiconductor ties with Taiwan as global chip demand accelerates. Martin Mayer, a semiconductor investment expert at Germany Trade & Invest (GTAI), Germany’s international economic promotion agency, said before leaving for Taiwan that the nation is a crucial partner in developing Germany’s semiconductor ecosystem. Germany’s debut at the international semiconductor exhibition in Taipei aims to “show presence” and signal its commitment to semiconductors, while building trust with Taiwanese companies, government and industry associations, he said. “The best outcome
People walk past advertising for a Syensqo chip at the Semicon Taiwan exhibition in Taipei yesterday.