The Australian government said yesterday it wanted to put Qantas on a “level playing field” with its rival airlines but indicated it would not remove a cap on foreign ownership.
Australian Transport Minister Anthony Albanese said the government wanted to maintain the legal requirement that the country’s international airlines, including Qantas, were at least 51 percent Australian owned.
But he said that it may be timely to consider whether additional ownership restrictions imposed on Qantas were appropriate.
Under the Qantas Sale Act individual foreign airlines can hold a maximum stake of 25 percent in the company and aggregate foreign airline interests must not exceed 35 percent.
“By removing that, but maintaining the 51 percent Australian ownership of Qantas, I think you would achieve an outcome that is balanced,” Albanese told the National Press Club in Canberra.
The foreign ownership limit could potentially frustrate any attempt by Qantas to merge with a rival carrier, a move former Qantas chief executive Geoff Dixon last week said was desirable given the challenges facing the industry.
Albanese said while the government wanted to move towards greater liberalization of the sector, Australia’s interests were paramount.
“It is not in the national interest for that cap to go,” he said.
“That doesn’t mean that there can’t be consolidation or alliances. It is a constraint on the form of them but I think that we have got the balance right.” Albanese said.
He said because of Australia’s location as a distant island continent, the aviation industry was important not only for economic but security reasons.
“At each step we need to make sure that the Australian national interest is also looked after,” he said. “Because we, unlike the mid-hemisphere airlines, aren’t on the way to anywhere.”
Qantas said while it was unlikely the 49 percent limit on foreign investment in Australian international airlines would change, the government’s preparedness to look at other ownership restrictions was welcome.
“This is a step in the right direction which will set us on an equal footing with other Australian international carriers,” Alan Joyce said in a statement.
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
CONSISTENT COMMITMENT: The American Institute in Taiwan director said that the US would expand investment and trade relationships to make both nations more prosperous The US would not abandon its commitment to Taiwan, and would make Taiwan safer, stronger and more prosperous, American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene said. “The US’ commitment to Taiwan has been consistent over many administrations and over many years, and we will not abandon our commitment to Taiwan, including our opposition to any attempt to use force or coercion to change Taiwan’s status,” he said in an exclusive interview with the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Friday last week, which was published in the Chinese-language newspaper yesterday. The US would double down on its efforts