Beyonce, Kendrick Lamar and ... The Beatles?
The Fab Four broke up more than half-a-century ago and only two members are still alive, but they are among the contenders for the Grammy celebrating the year’s best record, a head-scratching nomination that highlights the Recording Academy’s ongoing debate on how to handle artificial intelligence (AI).
News that The Beatles would release the song Now and Then with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans, but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved.
Photo: AFP
That is not the case: Now and Then was made using “stem separation,” a type of AI technology that allowed for cleaning up the decades old, lo-fi demo plagued by excess noise.
They used it to isolate John Lennon’s vocals from the unwanted bits of the recording, making it usable.
Creators then added electric and acoustic guitar recorded in 1995 by the late George Harrison, completing the song with drums from Ringo Starr, and bass, piano and slide guitar from Paul McCartney, along with additional backing vocals.
And the Recording Academy behind the Grammys gala — set for Sunday in Los Angeles — deemed it eligible to win Record of the Year, one of the night’s top prizes, as well as Best Rock Performance.
The institution has been grappling for years with AI’s implications for the music industry, as many artists voice serious concern over the ethics of music generated by the technology.
The academy released a ruling in 2023 that “only human creators are eligible” to be considered for Grammys.
“A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any categories,” the detailed rules read.
However, “a work that features elements of AI material (ie, material generated by the use of artificial intelligence technology) is eligible in applicable categories,” it added.
The takeaway: as it stands, work created with purely generative AI is not eligible.
Songs touched by AI tools that polish rather than create — such as Now and Then — can be considered.
As McCartney has put it regarding the Beatles track: “Nothing has been artificially created.”
Nashville singer-songwriter Mary Bragg said the type of technology used on Now and Then is quite common, calling its development a real “a-ha moment” for producers and engineers.
She said the tool is used routinely enough that the shock in media coverage over its use on the Beatles song was a bit overwrought.
Still, Bragg said the implications of AI tools in music remains a “big deal, because it is a new realm that we’re all existing in now.”
The questions are far-reaching and “it is certainly a slippery slope,” she said. “You have people learning about what’s possible more and more.”
“If the integrity of the art is not preserved, that’s when it’s of major concern,” she said.
At the forefront of artists’ concerns are issues like their work being used without clear permission or to train AI software, or their likeness being forged, with Bragg calling those examples “definitely part of the slippery slope category.”
Linda Bloss-Baum, a lecturer at American University and a member of the board of directors of the Songwriters of North America, said many aspects of AI worry her — but not the tech used on the Beatles track.
“There’s a lot of bad that can come to artists from AI, but this is an example of something really good,” she said.
“I think it’s a really good example of how AI can come to benefit artists, if they so want,” she added about the song, which was made with permission from the estates of Lennon and Harrison.
The announcement that The Beatles were in the running for one of the top Grammys triggered some eyerolls from industry watchers and social media users over the nomination of a legacy act alongside, or instead of, contemporary acts.
However, the Grammys are an industry award and not fan-chosen — and sometimes nominations have a behind-the-scenes thought process that makes sense to academy members even if it leaves the general public puzzled.
For one thing, Bragg said the prize for Record of the Year goes to song engineers and producers, as well as the artists.
Including The Beatles is “a nod to what is likely to be the case in the future in the world of recording,” she said.
Several of the acts up for the prize have been nominated before, but never won it, including Beyonce, Lamar and ...The Beatles.
It is the group’s fifth chance in the category; the last time was in 1971, for Let It Be.
China’s military news agency yesterday warned that Japanese militarism is infiltrating society through series such as Pokemon and Detective Conan, after recent controversies involving events at sensitive sites. In recent days, anime conventions throughout China have reportedly banned participants from dressing as characters from Pokemon or Detective Conan and prohibited sales of related products. China Military Online yesterday posted an article titled “Their schemes — beware the infiltration of Japanese militarism in culture and sports.” The article referenced recent controversies around the popular anime series Pokemon, Detective Conan and My Hero Academia, saying that “the evil influence of Japanese militarism lives on in
ANTI-SEMITISM: Some newsletters promote hateful ideas such as white supremacy and Holocaust denial, with one describing Adolf Hitler as ‘one of the greatest men of all time’ The global publishing platform Substack is generating revenue from newsletters that promote virulent Nazi ideology, white supremacy and anti-Semitism, a Guardian investigation has found. The platform, which says it has about 50 million users worldwide, allows members of the public to self-publish articles and charge for premium content. Substack takes about 10 percent of the revenue the newsletters make. About 5 million people pay for access to newsletters on its platform. Among them are newsletters that openly promote racist ideology. One, called NatSocToday, which has 2,800 subscribers, charges US$80 for an annual subscription, although most of its posts are available
GLORY FACADE: Residents are fighting the church’s plan to build a large flight of steps and a square that would entail destroying up to two blocks of homes Barcelona’s eternally unfinished Basilica de la Sagrada Familia has grown to become the world’s tallest church, but a conflict with residents threatens to delay the finish date for the monument designed more than 140 years ago. Swathed in scaffolding on a platform 54m above the ground, an enormous stone slab is being prepared to complete the cross of the central Jesus Christ tower. A huge yellow crane is to bring it up to the summit, which will stand at 172.5m and has snatched the record as the world’s tallest church from Germany’s Ulm Minster. The basilica’s peak will deliberately fall short of the
Venezuelan Nobel peace laureate Maria Corina Machado yesterday said that armed men “kidnapped” a close ally shortly after his release by authorities, following former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro’s capture. The country’s Public Prosecutor’s Office confirmed later yesterday that former National Assembly vice president Juan Pablo Guanipa, 61, was again taken into custody and was to be put under house arrest, arguing that he violated the conditions of his release. Guanipa would be placed under house arrest “in order to safeguard the criminal process,” the office said in a statement. The conditions of Guanipa’s release have yet to be made public. Machado claimed that
RSS