Beyonce, Kendrick Lamar and ... The Beatles?
The Fab Four broke up more than half-a-century ago and only two members are still alive, but they are among the contenders for the Grammy celebrating the year’s best record, a head-scratching nomination that highlights the Recording Academy’s ongoing debate on how to handle artificial intelligence (AI).
News that The Beatles would release the song Now and Then with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans, but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved.
Photo: AFP
That is not the case: Now and Then was made using “stem separation,” a type of AI technology that allowed for cleaning up the decades old, lo-fi demo plagued by excess noise.
They used it to isolate John Lennon’s vocals from the unwanted bits of the recording, making it usable.
Creators then added electric and acoustic guitar recorded in 1995 by the late George Harrison, completing the song with drums from Ringo Starr, and bass, piano and slide guitar from Paul McCartney, along with additional backing vocals.
And the Recording Academy behind the Grammys gala — set for Sunday in Los Angeles — deemed it eligible to win Record of the Year, one of the night’s top prizes, as well as Best Rock Performance.
The institution has been grappling for years with AI’s implications for the music industry, as many artists voice serious concern over the ethics of music generated by the technology.
The academy released a ruling in 2023 that “only human creators are eligible” to be considered for Grammys.
“A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any categories,” the detailed rules read.
However, “a work that features elements of AI material (ie, material generated by the use of artificial intelligence technology) is eligible in applicable categories,” it added.
The takeaway: as it stands, work created with purely generative AI is not eligible.
Songs touched by AI tools that polish rather than create — such as Now and Then — can be considered.
As McCartney has put it regarding the Beatles track: “Nothing has been artificially created.”
Nashville singer-songwriter Mary Bragg said the type of technology used on Now and Then is quite common, calling its development a real “a-ha moment” for producers and engineers.
She said the tool is used routinely enough that the shock in media coverage over its use on the Beatles song was a bit overwrought.
Still, Bragg said the implications of AI tools in music remains a “big deal, because it is a new realm that we’re all existing in now.”
The questions are far-reaching and “it is certainly a slippery slope,” she said. “You have people learning about what’s possible more and more.”
“If the integrity of the art is not preserved, that’s when it’s of major concern,” she said.
At the forefront of artists’ concerns are issues like their work being used without clear permission or to train AI software, or their likeness being forged, with Bragg calling those examples “definitely part of the slippery slope category.”
Linda Bloss-Baum, a lecturer at American University and a member of the board of directors of the Songwriters of North America, said many aspects of AI worry her — but not the tech used on the Beatles track.
“There’s a lot of bad that can come to artists from AI, but this is an example of something really good,” she said.
“I think it’s a really good example of how AI can come to benefit artists, if they so want,” she added about the song, which was made with permission from the estates of Lennon and Harrison.
The announcement that The Beatles were in the running for one of the top Grammys triggered some eyerolls from industry watchers and social media users over the nomination of a legacy act alongside, or instead of, contemporary acts.
However, the Grammys are an industry award and not fan-chosen — and sometimes nominations have a behind-the-scenes thought process that makes sense to academy members even if it leaves the general public puzzled.
For one thing, Bragg said the prize for Record of the Year goes to song engineers and producers, as well as the artists.
Including The Beatles is “a nod to what is likely to be the case in the future in the world of recording,” she said.
Several of the acts up for the prize have been nominated before, but never won it, including Beyonce, Lamar and ...The Beatles.
It is the group’s fifth chance in the category; the last time was in 1971, for Let It Be.
Four people jailed in the landmark Hong Kong national security trial of "47 democrats" accused of conspiracy to commit subversion were freed today after more than four years behind bars, the second group to be released in a month. Among those freed was long-time political and LGBTQ activist Jimmy Sham (岑子杰), who also led one of Hong Kong’s largest pro-democracy groups, the Civil Human Rights Front, which disbanded in 2021. "Let me spend some time with my family," Sham said after arriving at his home in the Kowloon district of Jordan. "I don’t know how to plan ahead because, to me, it feels
The collapse of the Swiss Birch glacier serves as a chilling warning of the escalating dangers faced by communities worldwide living under the shadow of fragile ice, particularly in Asia, experts said. Footage of the collapse on Wednesday showed a huge cloud of ice and rubble hurtling down the mountainside into the hamlet of Blatten. Swiss Development Cooperation disaster risk reduction adviser Ali Neumann said that while the role of climate change in the case of Blatten “still needs to be investigated,” the wider impacts were clear on the cryosphere — the part of the world covered by frozen water. “Climate change and
Poland is set to hold a presidential runoff election today between two candidates offering starkly different visions for the country’s future. The winner would succeed Polish President Andrzej Duda, a conservative who is finishing his second and final term. The outcome would determine whether Poland embraces a nationalist populist trajectory or pivots more fully toward liberal, pro-European policies. An exit poll by Ipsos would be released when polls close today at 9pm local time, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Final results are expected tomorrow. Whoever wins can be expected to either help or hinder the
DENIAL: Musk said that the ‘New York Times was lying their ass off,’ after it reported he used so much drugs that he developed bladder problems Elon Musk on Saturday denied a report that he used ketamine and other drugs extensively last year on the US presidential campaign trail. The New York Times on Friday reported that the billionaire adviser to US President Donald Trump used so much ketamine, a powerful anesthetic, that he developed bladder problems. The newspaper said the world’s richest person also took ecstasy and mushrooms, and traveled with a pill box last year, adding that it was not known whether Musk also took drugs while heading the so-called US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Trump took power in January. In a
RSS