Britain’s plan to send migrants and asylum seekers to Rwanda has left survivors of a similar scheme in Australia wondering why the “failed” policy that shattered their lives is being revived elsewhere.
For more than six years, Sudan-born refugee Abdul Aziz Muhamat was detained by Australian authorities in a small tropical island camp off Papua New Guinea’s mainland, hidden from full legal and public oversight.
“The simplest way to describe daily life on Manus Island is there’s no life,” Muhamat explained. “It’s worse than a prison. If you cry, no one will listen. If you shout, no one will come.”
Photo: EPA-EFE
Muhamat’s detention was part of Australia’s “Pacific Solution,” under which thousands of people who attempted to reach the country by boat were moved to offshore centers on Manus and the tiny nation of Nauru.
There, they were processed, given identification numbers and barred from ever permanently settling in Australia. Many languished in the camps for years, in conditions described by rights groups as “hellish.”
“They never could have got away with the conditions in those camps if they had been in Australia,” said Nick McKim, an Australian Greens Party senator who visited Manus five times before being refused entry.
“I have no hesitation in describing what happened in those camps as torture,” he said.
After vast taxpayer expense, 14 detainee deaths, a string of suicide attempts — some by detainees as young as five — and at least six referrals to the International Criminal Court, Australia’s scheme has been scaled back piece-by-piece. As of last month there were about 100 people still on Nauru.
Now the concept is being given new life by Britain, which plans to send asylum seekers to the land-locked African nation of Rwanda.
Iranian-born journalist Behrouz Boochani in 2013 was detained on Manus Island as he crossed from Indonesia during his flight from Iranian authorities, who considered him a dissident. He wrote a memoir about his time on Manus before receiving asylum in New Zealand.
Boochani urged the British public to resist plans “to copy the deeply dehumanizing asylum policies of Australia.”
However, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson — who has taken advice from a series of prominent Australian political strategists — has offered a familiar explanation for why it needs to go ahead: deterrence.
Like his Australian counterparts, Johnson said the policy will convince would-be migrants not to undertake perilous sea journeys on often rickety and overloaded vessels.
However, Australian legal expert Madeline Gleeson of the Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law said data shows “definitively” that offshore detention did not deter asylum seekers.
Gleeson said the UK scheme most closely mirrors Australia’s policy between August 2012 and July 2013, when only some asylum seekers were sent to offshore camps.
“In that period, the number of people arriving by boat continued to rise to levels never before seen in Australia,” she said.
Muhamat, who attempted three times to reach Australia by boat from Indonesia, losing five of his closest friends en route, is more direct.
The policy “achieved nothing,” he said. “When you’re running to save your life. You don’t think about the tragedy you will encounter on your journey.”
“This is really one of the points that people don’t understand,” he added. “What option do people have? They have only one option; they will continue risking their life.”
Now living in Switzerland, Muhamat said the policy simply condemns people to a “failed” system — and tarnishes Britain’s status in the world.
“It will destroy the reputation of an entire country,” he said. “The image of the UK will be replaced with an image of human misery.”
AFGHAN CHILD: A court battle is ongoing over if the toddler can stay with Joshua Mast and his wife, who wanted ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ for her Major Joshua Mast, a US Marine whose adoption of an Afghan war orphan has spurred a years-long legal battle, is to remain on active duty after a three-member panel of Marines on Tuesday found that while he acted in a way unbecoming of an officer to bring home the baby girl, it did not warrant his separation from the military. Lawyers for the Marine Corps argued that Mast abused his position, disregarded orders of his superiors, mishandled classified information and improperly used a government computer in his fight over the child who was found orphaned on the battlefield in rural Afghanistan
STICKING TO DEFENSE: Despite the screening of videos in which they appeared, one of the defendants said they had no memory of the event A court trying a Frenchman charged with drugging his wife and enlisting dozens of strangers to rape her screened videos of the abuse to the public on Friday, to challenge several codefendants who denied knowing she was unconscious during their actions. The judge in the southern city of Avignon had nine videos and several photographs of the abuse of Gisele Pelicot shown in the courtroom and an adjoining public chamber, involving seven of the 50 men accused alongside her husband. Present in the courtroom herself, Gisele Pelicot looked at her telephone during the hour and a half of screenings, while her ex-husband
NEW STORM: investigators dubbed the attacks on US telecoms ‘Salt Typhoon,’ after authorities earlier this year disrupted China’s ‘Flax Typhoon’ hacking group Chinese hackers accessed the networks of US broadband providers and obtained information from systems that the federal government uses for court-authorized wiretapping, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Saturday. The networks of Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies, along with other telecoms, were breached by the recently discovered intrusion, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The hackers might have held access for months to network infrastructure used by the companies to cooperate with court-authorized US requests for communications data, the report said. The hackers had also accessed other tranches of Internet traffic, it said. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
EYEING THE US ELECTION: Analysts say that Pyongyang would likely leverage its enlarged nuclear arsenal for concessions after a new US administration is inaugurated North Korean leader Kim Jong-un warned again that he could use nuclear weapons in potential conflicts with South Korea and the US, as he accused them of provoking North Korea and raising animosities on the Korean Peninsula, state media reported yesterday. Kim has issued threats to use nuclear weapons pre-emptively numerous times, but his latest warning came as experts said that North Korea could ramp up hostilities ahead of next month’s US presidential election. In a Monday speech at a university named after him, the Kim Jong-un National Defense University, he said that North Korea “will without hesitation use all its attack