For a small town in Lincolnshire, England, which former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher once called home, it has been an issue as divisive as Brexit: Should Grantham erect a statue commemorating the UK’s first female prime minister?
It is a simple enough question, but the process of erecting a statue of the “Iron Lady,” created by sculptor Douglas Jennings, has been a long, painstaking and arduous process.
The statue was rejected by Westminster City Council in central London in 2018 because councilors feared it would be a magnet for vandalism and protests.
It was then offered to her home town of Grantham and, following a brisk debate by the planning committee, was approved in 2018.
Some hoped that would be the end of it, but the statue remained stored away.
The council’s controversial decision to underwrite a ￡100,000 (US$133,915) unveiling ceremony on Tuesday then reignited the debate on whether the statue should be erected. The vote, in the middle of a global pandemic that has sparked the deepest recession in a generation, has been heavily criticized.
“We find that in the middle of a pandemic, when the public coffers both on a national level and a local level are emptying very quickly, their sense of priorities to be absolutely perverse,” Grantham Labour Party chairman Lee Steptoe said. “She was arguably the most divisive prime minister this country has ever had and this is an incredibly divisive decision by the local Tories [Conservative Party].”
For Amanda Schonhut, director of fundraising for Grantham Museum, which had been pushing to have the statue situated on a green midway between two existing statues, one of 19th-century lawmaker Frederick James Tollemache and another of Sir Isaac Newton, it is an important step forward.
“It’s been a long hard road. There’s been a few knocks and bumps along the way,” Schonhut said. “It’s nice to see things finally coming to fruition.”
She was keen to stress that the cost of the unveiling would come from private donations, but accepts the issue would continue to divide the town.
“It’s been a bit like a mini Brexit,” she said.
She hopes the statue would attract visitors to the museum and the local area.
The Labour Party have called for the statue to be displayed within the museum.
Adam Burgess, who lives in Stamford, said that he was ashamed by the announcement that the council would underwrite the unveiling.
“In the area we’re living in we’re seeing a huge number of homeless people, we’re seeing food banks springing up all over the place,” Burgess said.
Given Thatcher’s controversial legacy, it was a “poorly judged decision” to push ahead with the statue, he said.
“There’s got to be better ways to spend that money. To erect a statue of someone who was so divisive and caused a lot of heartache for the working class just seemed like a pretty shit decision, to be honest,” he added.
Ralph Harrison, a retired civil servant who lives in Grantham, disagreed and was pleased that the statue would soon be unveiled.
“It’s a relatively small town that has produced somebody that is known in the world stage and will be in the history books,” Harrison said. “I appreciate there are lots of different views on Margaret Thatcher, she is a very controversial figure, but it’s a question of achievement. She achieved something when becoming the first woman prime minister.”
Independent Grantham councilor Ashley Baxter said that there had been two notable changes since the council gave permission for the statue to be erected.
“The first significant change is that we are now being told that there is a risk that we will have to underwrite the cost of the unveiling event. And the second thing is the whole statue controversy, leading with Black Lives Matter and the [slave trader] Edward Coulson statue incident in Bristol, and statues around the world. People are questioning a lot more the merit of having statues of divisive figures,” Baxter said. “I think we really need to think carefully before we go ahead with this, in terms of the policing, in terms of security, in terms of the reputation of the town, there are questions to be asked.”
On the Chinese microblogging platform Sina Weibo, enthusiastic slackers share their tips: Fill up a thermos with whiskey, do planks or stretches in the work pantry at regular intervals, drink liters of water to prompt lots of trips to the toilet on work time, and, once there, spend time on social media or playing games on your phone. “Not working hard is everyone’s basic right,” one commenter wrote. “With or without legal protection, everyone has the right to not work hard.” Young Chinese people are pushing back against an engrained culture of overwork, and embracing a philosophy of laziness known as “touching
‘STUNNED’: With help from an official at the US Department of Justice, Donald Trump reportedly planned to oust the acting attorney general in a bid to overturn the election Former US president Donald Trump was at his Florida resort on Saturday, beginning post-presidency life while US President Joe Biden settled into the White House, but in Washington and beyond, the chaos of the 45th president’s final days in office continued to throw out damaging aftershocks. In yet another earth-shaking report, the New York Times said that Trump plotted with an official at the US Department of Justice to fire the acting attorney general, then force Georgia Republicans to overturn his defeat in that state. Meanwhile, former acting US secretary of defense Christopher Miller made an extraordinary admission, telling Vanity Fair that
Boeing set a target of designing and certifying its jetliners to fly on 100 percent sustainable fuels by 2030, amid rising pressure on planemakers to take climate change seriously. Regulators allow a 50-50 blend of sustainable and conventional fuels, and Boeing on Friday said it would work with authorities to raise the limit. Rival Airbus is considering another tack: a futuristic lineup of hydrogen-powered aircraft that would reach the skies by 2035. The aircraft manufacturers face growing public clamor to cut emissions in the aviation industry, which added more than 1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in 2019, according to
Mongolian Prime Minister Ukhnaagiin Khurelsukh on Thursday resigned following a protest over a hospital’s treatment of a new mother who tested positive for COVID-19. Khurelsukh, whose Mongolian People’s Party holds a strong majority in the parliament known as the State Great Khural, stepped down after accusing Mongolian President Khaltmaagiin Battulga of the Democratic Party of orchestrating a political crisis. A small protest broke out in the capital, Ulan Bator, on Wednesday after TV footage appeared of a woman who had just given birth being escorted in slippers and a thin robe from the maternity ward to a special wing for COVID-19 patients