For a small town in Lincolnshire, England, which former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher once called home, it has been an issue as divisive as Brexit: Should Grantham erect a statue commemorating the UK’s first female prime minister?
It is a simple enough question, but the process of erecting a statue of the “Iron Lady,” created by sculptor Douglas Jennings, has been a long, painstaking and arduous process.
The statue was rejected by Westminster City Council in central London in 2018 because councilors feared it would be a magnet for vandalism and protests.
Photo: AFP
It was then offered to her home town of Grantham and, following a brisk debate by the planning committee, was approved in 2018.
Some hoped that would be the end of it, but the statue remained stored away.
The council’s controversial decision to underwrite a £100,000 (US$133,915) unveiling ceremony on Tuesday then reignited the debate on whether the statue should be erected. The vote, in the middle of a global pandemic that has sparked the deepest recession in a generation, has been heavily criticized.
“We find that in the middle of a pandemic, when the public coffers both on a national level and a local level are emptying very quickly, their sense of priorities to be absolutely perverse,” Grantham Labour Party chairman Lee Steptoe said. “She was arguably the most divisive prime minister this country has ever had and this is an incredibly divisive decision by the local Tories [Conservative Party].”
For Amanda Schonhut, director of fundraising for Grantham Museum, which had been pushing to have the statue situated on a green midway between two existing statues, one of 19th-century lawmaker Frederick James Tollemache and another of Sir Isaac Newton, it is an important step forward.
“It’s been a long hard road. There’s been a few knocks and bumps along the way,” Schonhut said. “It’s nice to see things finally coming to fruition.”
She was keen to stress that the cost of the unveiling would come from private donations, but accepts the issue would continue to divide the town.
“It’s been a bit like a mini Brexit,” she said.
She hopes the statue would attract visitors to the museum and the local area.
The Labour Party have called for the statue to be displayed within the museum.
Adam Burgess, who lives in Stamford, said that he was ashamed by the announcement that the council would underwrite the unveiling.
“In the area we’re living in we’re seeing a huge number of homeless people, we’re seeing food banks springing up all over the place,” Burgess said.
Given Thatcher’s controversial legacy, it was a “poorly judged decision” to push ahead with the statue, he said.
“There’s got to be better ways to spend that money. To erect a statue of someone who was so divisive and caused a lot of heartache for the working class just seemed like a pretty shit decision, to be honest,” he added.
Ralph Harrison, a retired civil servant who lives in Grantham, disagreed and was pleased that the statue would soon be unveiled.
“It’s a relatively small town that has produced somebody that is known in the world stage and will be in the history books,” Harrison said. “I appreciate there are lots of different views on Margaret Thatcher, she is a very controversial figure, but it’s a question of achievement. She achieved something when becoming the first woman prime minister.”
Independent Grantham councilor Ashley Baxter said that there had been two notable changes since the council gave permission for the statue to be erected.
“The first significant change is that we are now being told that there is a risk that we will have to underwrite the cost of the unveiling event. And the second thing is the whole statue controversy, leading with Black Lives Matter and the [slave trader] Edward Coulson statue incident in Bristol, and statues around the world. People are questioning a lot more the merit of having statues of divisive figures,” Baxter said. “I think we really need to think carefully before we go ahead with this, in terms of the policing, in terms of security, in terms of the reputation of the town, there are questions to be asked.”
With much pomp and circumstance, Cairo is today to inaugurate the long-awaited Grand Egyptian Museum (GEM), widely presented as the crowning jewel on authorities’ efforts to overhaul the country’s vital tourism industry. With a panoramic view of the Giza pyramids plateau, the museum houses thousands of artifacts spanning more than 5,000 years of Egyptian antiquity at a whopping cost of more than US$1 billion. More than two decades in the making, the ultra-modern museum anticipates 5 million visitors annually, with never-before-seen relics on display. In the run-up to the grand opening, Egyptian media and official statements have hailed the “historic moment,” describing the
‘CHILD PORNOGRAPHY’: The doll on Shein’s Web site measure about 80cm in height, and it was holding a teddy bear in a photo published by a daily newspaper France’s anti-fraud unit on Saturday said it had reported Asian e-commerce giant Shein (希音) for selling what it described as “sex dolls with a childlike appearance.” The French Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) said in a statement that the “description and categorization” of the items on Shein’s Web site “make it difficult to doubt the child pornography nature of the content.” Shortly after the statement, Shein announced that the dolls in question had been withdrawn from its platform and that it had launched an internal inquiry. On its Web site, Le Parisien daily published a
China’s Shenzhou-20 crewed spacecraft has delayed its return mission to Earth after the vessel was possibly hit by tiny bits of space debris, the country’s human spaceflight agency said yesterday, an unusual situation that could disrupt the operation of the country’s space station Tiangong. An impact analysis and risk assessment are underway, the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA) said in a statement, without providing a new schedule for the return mission, which was originally set to land in northern China yesterday. The delay highlights the danger to space travel posed by increasing amounts of debris, such as discarded launch vehicles or vessel
RUBBER STAMP? The latest legislative session was the most productive in the number of bills passed, but critics attributed it to a lack of dissenting voices On their last day at work, Hong Kong’s lawmakers — the first batch chosen under Beijing’s mantra of “patriots administering Hong Kong” — posed for group pictures, celebrating a job well done after four years of opposition-free politics. However, despite their smiles, about one-third of the Legislative Council will not seek another term in next month’s election, with the self-described non-establishment figure Tik Chi-yuen (狄志遠) being among those bowing out. “It used to be that [the legislature] had the benefit of free expression... Now it is more uniform. There are multiple voices, but they are not diverse enough,” Tik said, comparing it