The government of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is looking to sidestep the High Court of Australia’s decision that Aboriginal non-citizens cannot be deported using the aliens power by using other powers instead, Australian Attorney General Christian Porter has said.
Responding to the court’s landmark decision on Tuesday, Porter said that he found “great strength of reasoning” in Chief Justice Susan Kiefel’s minority judgement and that the government might be able to legislate to deport the “not very large” group of Aboriginal non-citizens who have committed crimes in another way.
In a four-to-three decision, the court held that Aboriginal people with sufficient connection to traditional societies cannot be aliens and therefore are beyond the reach of existing deportation laws, which depend on the aliens power in Section 51 (xix) of the country’s constitution.
Porter yesterday told 6PR Radio that the decision has “very significant, immediate ramifications for what might not be a very large group of people.”
Porter said that this group — “people who are born overseas, who aren’t Australian citizens, but might be able to show indigeneity, and who are in Australia on a visa and commit an offense” would now “have to be treated differently from all other persons in the same circumstances,” because they cannot be deported under existing law.
“So, it has a clear impact for that group of people and that policy of deporting people who’ve committed serious offenses while on a visa and who are non-citizens,” he said.
“And we’ll be looking into ways in which we might be able to effect that policy, without reliance on the power that we previously were relying on, but we’ll look at that,” he added.
Porter tacitly endorsed Kiefel’s view, saying that her “minority reasoning was what I would have expected,” but conceded that the majority view would have implications for the federal government’s “program of pretty vigorous deportation of people that we consider represent a threat to the Australian community and Australian citizens.”
In his minority judgement, Justice Stephen Gageler laid out a blueprint for how parliament could address the “complications and uncertainties” created for the maintenance of an “orderly immigration program” by reinstating its powers to deport Aboriginal non-citizens.
He said these could be addressed “by the commonwealth parliament reverting to the approach of relying on the power conferred by [section] 51(xxvii) to make laws with respect to ‘immigration and emigration.’”
“Alternatively, the parliament might consider itself obliged to address them through racially targeted legislation enacted under s 51(xxvi) of the constitution [the race power],” he added.
Gageler said on the “correct understanding” of the aliens power “neither is a course which the commonwealth parliament ought to be driven to take.”
Porter said that the judgement “may have broader implications.”
“It creates an entirely new category of people in terms of what the government can and can’t do,” he said, in reference to the new category of “belonger” — a non-citizen non-alien, recognized by the majority.
“Whether or not the principle has application in areas where the commonwealth relies on other heads of power, I think, is far less clear,” he said.
Porter said that it was “not always an easy test” to determine if a person is indigenous, citing the fact that the court now requires a further hearing to determine if the second plaintiff, Daniel Love, is accepted as Aboriginal Australian by the Kamilaroi tribe.
Although the decision has already provoked a furious response from conservative commentators who argue that it introduces a new race-based distinction in the constitution, legal experts, including Sydney University constitutional law professor Anne Twomey, have said that it was too soon to know what the possible ramifications for the case might be beyond immigration law.
Wamba Wamba lawyer Eddie Synot, manager of the Indigenous Law Centre at the University of New South Wales, said the judgement concerned a “very narrow application of the aliens power” and explicitly stated it was not a recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty.
“More than anything for me, today just confirmed that the high court is never really going to be an environment where we’re ever going to be able to settle those original questions about sovereignty and the founding of the nations,” Synot said.
“It’s going to have to be a political decision outside of the court,” he added.
Synot said the decision had caused some angst among Aboriginal people concerned that a court was yet again appearing to decide on Aboriginal identity and belonging to country.
Those concerns have been heightened in the past few weeks by a request, swiftly denied, for police to investigate the Aboriginality of author Bruce Pascoe.
LANDMARK CASE: ‘Every night we were dragged to US soldiers and sexually abused. Every week we were forced to undergo venereal disease tests,’ a victim said More than 100 South Korean women who were forced to work as prostitutes for US soldiers stationed in the country have filed a landmark lawsuit accusing Washington of abuse, their lawyers said yesterday. Historians and activists say tens of thousands of South Korean women worked for state-sanctioned brothels from the 1950s to 1980s, serving US troops stationed in country to protect the South from North Korea. In 2022, South Korea’s top court ruled that the government had illegally “established, managed and operated” such brothels for the US military, ordering it to pay about 120 plaintiffs compensation. Last week, 117 victims
China on Monday announced its first ever sanctions against an individual Japanese lawmaker, targeting China-born Hei Seki for “spreading fallacies” on issues such as Taiwan, Hong Kong and disputed islands, prompting a protest from Tokyo. Beijing has an ongoing spat with Tokyo over islands in the East China Sea claimed by both countries, and considers foreign criticism on sensitive political topics to be acts of interference. Seki, a naturalised Japanese citizen, “spread false information, colluded with Japanese anti-China forces, and wantonly attacked and smeared China”, foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters on Monday. “For his own selfish interests, (Seki)
Argentine President Javier Milei on Sunday vowed to “accelerate” his libertarian reforms after a crushing defeat in Buenos Aires provincial elections. The 54-year-old economist has slashed public spending, dismissed tens of thousands of public employees and led a major deregulation drive since taking office in December 2023. He acknowledged his party’s “clear defeat” by the center-left Peronist movement in the elections to the legislature of Buenos Aires province, the country’s economic powerhouse. A deflated-sounding Milei admitted to unspecified “mistakes” which he vowed to “correct,” but said he would not be swayed “one millimeter” from his reform agenda. “We will deepen and accelerate it,” he
‘HYANGDO’: A South Korean lawmaker said there was no credible evidence to support rumors that Kim Jong-un has a son with a disability or who is studying abroad South Korea’s spy agency yesterday said that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s daughter, Kim Ju-ae, who last week accompanied him on a high-profile visit to Beijing, is understood to be his recognized successor. The teenager drew global attention when she made her first official overseas trip with her father, as he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Analysts have long seen her as Kim’s likely successor, although some have suggested she has an older brother who is being secretly groomed as the next leader. The South Korean National Intelligence Service (NIS) “assesses that she [Kim Ju-ae]
RSS