Iran and world powers have concluded a surprisingly cordial summit in Kazakhstan that appears to have given a gentle nudge to the decade-long nuclear stalemate, experts said.
Two days of talks in the soaring Tien Shan mountain city of Almaty concluded on Wednesday amid continued saber-rattling from Israel and worry on international oil markets about the prospects of yet another Middle East war.
However, Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — the US, China, Russia, Britain and France — plus Germany, did agree to hold new talks on the Islamic republic’s disputed nuclear drive in the coming weeks.
Iran flatly denies charges that it is enriching uranium at an increasingly rapid pace in order to one day build a nuclear weapon.
However, Israel and its main ally the US have few doubts this is exactly the case.
The issue has been debated on three prior occasions in the past year alone. The last meeting between Iran and the leading powers, known as P5+1, ended in June without the sides able to agree to meet again.
Things went differently this time. The meeting saw the leading powers offer Iran a softening of non-oil or financial sector-related sanctions in exchange for concessions over its uranium enrichment operations.
Encouraged by the possible sanctions relief, Tehran said the parties had agreed to hold their next meeting at the same venue on April 5 and 6, after talks between senior civil servants on the issue in Istanbul next month.
“Some of the points raised in their [the world powers’] response were more realistic, compared to what they said in the past,” chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili told reporters in words that amounted to rare praise.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad later added that “negotiations are better than confrontation,” while Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said “things are taking a turning point.”
The tone — if not the actual content of what was achieved in Kazakhstan — left some analysts both surprised and impressed.
“This is interesting because what we are seeing is the start of a process,” Moscow’s PIR nuclear safety research institute analyst Andrei Baklitsky said.
“The positions are slowly starting to merge. In other words, there are finally things there for them to discuss,” he aid.
One analyst said the key was to break the initial ice and find a single issue around which future contacts could build.
“The most important development is that we might have a basis for further negotiation. In all previous talks, each side categorically dismissed the other’s opening position,” Shashank Joshi of the Royal United Services Institute said.
All sides agree there is little more time to waste and it is unclear what impact there will be from a looming June presidential vote in which Iranians will elect a successor to Ahmadinejad.
The sanctions are starting to bite at home and Jalili may be prepared to offer more flexibility if ordinary Iranians are starting to tire of their increasing isolation from the global economy.
US officials have been keen to call the Almaty session “useful” — a more neutral word than either “positive” or “negative.”
However, they also pointed out that a good atmosphere during negotiations does not necessarily produce workable compromises.
“What matters are the results,” a senior US official said.
“You care about the atmospherics, but in the end, you need concrete results,” the official said.
And those — in Washington’s eyes — would see Iran halt uranium enrichment to the 20 percent levels experts view as within striking distance of weapons-grade matter.
Iranians like Jalili argue that the West is not even making 20 percent enrichment an issue worthy of discussion at this stage — a claim refuted by the US official.
Yet there is little doubt that the spirit of the discussion has changed.
“In past meetings, the approach centered on coercion: The main motivator for concessions was the threat of new sanctions and other escalatory steps,” National Iranian American Council president Trita Parsi said.
“That approach has failed as Iran responded with its own escalation: It expanded its enrichment activities, installed new and improved centrifuges and amassed more enriched uranium,” Parsi said.
That policy ran the region toward the very real danger of Israeli action — a convincing argument for a strategy shift.
Now the world powers appear to be willing to take the first step by offering sanctions relief, and may find a more responsive Iran in return, experts said.
“Jalili’s positive, conciliatory statements today represent a meaningful shift away from that pattern of mutual disdain,” Joshi said.
“It makes it more likely that Iran will, in due course, be able to come up with a more realistic counteroffer,” he said.
Thousands gathered across New Zealand yesterday to celebrate the signing of the country’s founding document and some called for an end to government policies that critics say erode the rights promised to the indigenous Maori population. As the sun rose on the dawn service at Waitangi where the Treaty of Waitangi was first signed between the British Crown and Maori chiefs in 1840, some community leaders called on the government to honor promises made 185 years ago. The call was repeated at peaceful rallies that drew several hundred people later in the day. “This government is attacking tangata whenua [indigenous people] on all
RIGHTS FEARS: A protester said Beijing would use the embassy to catch and send Hong Kongers to China, while a lawmaker said Chinese agents had threatened Britons Hundreds of demonstrators on Saturday protested at a site earmarked for Beijing’s controversial new embassy in London over human rights and security concerns. The new embassy — if approved by the British government — would be the “biggest Chinese embassy in Europe,” one lawmaker said earlier. Protester Iona Boswell, a 40-year-old social worker, said there was “no need for a mega embassy here” and that she believed it would be used to facilitate the “harassment of dissidents.” China has for several years been trying to relocate its embassy, currently in the British capital’s upmarket Marylebone district, to the sprawling historic site in the
‘IMPOSSIBLE’: The authors of the study, which was published in an environment journal, said that the findings appeared grim, but that honesty is necessary for change Holding long-term global warming to 2°C — the fallback target of the Paris climate accord — is now “impossible,” according to a new analysis published by leading scientists. Led by renowned climatologist James Hansen, the paper appears in the journal Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development and concludes that Earth’s climate is more sensitive to rising greenhouse gas emissions than previously thought. Compounding the crisis, Hansen and colleagues argued, is a recent decline in sunlight-blocking aerosol pollution from the shipping industry, which had been mitigating some of the warming. An ambitious climate change scenario outlined by the UN’s climate
BACK TO BATTLE: North Korean soldiers have returned to the front lines in Russia’s Kursk region after earlier reports that Moscow had withdrawn them following heavy losses Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday pored over a once-classified map of vast deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals as part of a push to appeal to US President Donald Trump’s penchant for a deal. The US president, whose administration is pressing for a rapid end to Ukraine’s war with Russia, on Monday said he wanted Ukraine to supply the US with rare earths and other minerals in return for financially supporting its war effort. “If we are talking about a deal, then let’s do a deal, we are only for it,” Zelenskiy said, emphasizing Ukraine’s need for security guarantees