Afghanistan has many dubious distinctions on the international-rankings front: 10th poorest, third most corrupt, worst place to be a child, longest at war. To that may soon be added: most heavily fingerprinted.
Since September, Afghanistan has been the only country in the world to fingerprint and photograph all travelers who pass through Kabul International Airport, arriving and departing.
A handful of other countries fingerprint arriving foreigners, but no country has ever sought to gather biometric data on everyone who comes and goes, whatever their nationality. Nor do Afghan authorities plan to stop there: Their goal is to fingerprint, photograph and scan the irises of every living Afghan.
It is a goal heartily endorsed by the US military, which has already gathered biometric data on 2 million Afghans who have been encountered by soldiers on the battlefield, or who have just applied for a job with the coalition military or its civilian contractors.
The Kabul airport program is also financed by the US, with money and training provided by the US embassy. US citizens, like all other travelers, are subject to it.
“Some of the embassies are quite exercised about it,” one Western diplomat said.
Such a program would be illegal if carried out in the home countries of most of the occupying coalition. The US and Japan fingerprint all foreigners on arrival; South Korea plans to start doing so in January. Brazil retaliated against the US program by fingerprinting arriving US citizens only. Officials at the US embassy declined to comment specifically on the program; a spokesman for the US Department of Homeland Security denied it had anything to do with it.
Biometric data is also being gathered by the US military at all of Afghanistan’s eight major border crossings, in a program that it plans to hand over to the Afghan government at the end of this month. So far, that program gathers only random samples at border crossings because traffic is so heavy, but since it began in April it has already added 200,000 people to the military’s biometrics database.
The military wants to use biometrics to identify known or suspected insurgents and to prevent infiltration of military bases and Afghan security forces.
Gathering the data does not stop at Afghanistan’s borders, however, since the military shares all of the biometrics it collects with the US Department of Justice and Homeland Security through interconnected databases.
Even the civilian-run airport program collecting fingerprints and photographs feeds its information into computers at the US embassy, as well as at the Afghan Ministry of the Interior and its intelligence agency, the National Directorate of Security, according to head of the Kabul International Airport, Mohammad Yaqub Rasuli.
Rasuli acknowledges that the airport screening has had a rocky start.
“We are happy with the system, but the airlines and the passengers are not that happy,” he said.
Delays of up to two hours have resulted from the screening, which takes at least three minutes per passenger. With six screening stations at most, the process becomes laborious and so many travelers recently have been missing their flights that the airlines routinely delay takeoffs.
Reporters at the airport have on several occasions witnessed immigration officers just waving through some passengers as crowds backed up; others were allowed to skip their thumbprints to speed things along. One man had his hand fingerprinted upside down, with nails facing the scanner.
“It is some sort of cultural deficiency,” Rasuli said. “After six months, everyone will be happy with it.”
The next step will be a national identity card with biometric data on every citizen, he said.
Information on each person is fed into a computer to find those who are on terrorist watch lists, have outstanding criminal warrants or are businessmen under investigation.
How many suspects have been apprehended with the new system, Rasuli was asked.
“None,” he said.
The military has done somewhat better with its program, according to director of the US Army’s biometrics task force, Colonel Fred Washington. Since 2007, when biometric collection began in Afghanistan, biometrics have been used to identify 3,000 suspects on either Watch List 1 or Watch List 2, the US military’s two most serious classifications for possible insurgents or terrorists. In many cases, fingerprints found on bomb remains have identified the bomb-maker, he said.
“People are accepting it because they know it’s making their country secure,” Washington said.
Executive director of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, Mohammad Musa Mahmoodi, said: “Given the circumstances in Afghanistan, fighting terrorism and insurgency, government can take measures to protect its citizens.”
Civil liberties groups abroad are more concerned.
“The situation in Afghanistan is unprecedented, but I worry that we could move into that situation in the United States without even realizing we’re doing it,” said Jennifer Lynch, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco.
There have been some signs of Afghan sensitivities as well. A program to gather biometric data Kandahar last year, during the push to control insurgency there, was so unpopular that Afghan President Hamid Karzai promised local elders to have it canceled, which it was, according to Zalmai Ayoubi, a spokesman for the governor in Kandahar Province.
The Afghan government has yet to pass legislation providing for the biometric screening of the entire population that it plans to carry out for the national identity card.
As a result, the military has not conducted wholesale sweeps of communities to gather biometrics, Washington said, although in just the past year 12,000 soldiers have been trained to use the Biometric Automated Toolset (BAT).
“We can’t go door to door,” he said.
The Commander’s Guide to Biometrics in Afghanistan, however, encourages documenting as many Afghans as possible.
“Every person who lives within an operational area should be identified and fully biometrically enrolled with facial photos, iris scans and all 10 fingerprints [if present],” the guide says.
While the BAT equipment is portable, it is not always easy to use and the results can sometimes be unpredictable.
A reporter from the New York Times, a US citizen of Norwegian rather than Afghan extraction, voluntarily submitted to a test screening with the BAT system. After his fingerprints and iris scans were entered into the BAT’s armored laptop, an unexpected “hit” popped up on the screen, along with the photograph of a heavily bearded Afghan.
The “hit” identified the reporter as “Haji Daro Shar Mohammed,” who is on terrorist Watch List 4, with this note: “Deny access, do not hire, subject poses a threat.”
LOST AT SEA: Survivors of a sunken Cambodian ship said they floated for two days in open waters, while a UN official said that traffickers might continue undeterred Chinese survivors from a boat that sank near a Cambodian island, killing three people and leaving eight missing, said they embarked on what they believed would be a short-term fishing job and ended up without food and water aboard the vessel, and their belongings were taken away. Cambodian authorities said on Friday they rescued 21 people one day after the boat small wooden fishing vessel sank near Koh Tang, a Cambodian island close to the maritime border with Vietnam. Nine more people were rescued by the Vietnamese and three bodies were recovered by Cambodia, leaving eight people still missing, Preah Sihanouk provincial
SOUTH CHINA SEA: Despite differences on some matters, Marcos has pledged to foster closer ties with China, calling the relationship ‘advantageous’ to both nations The Philippines is interested in renewing talks with China on joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea to expand and diversify its sources of energy, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr said in an interview. The Southeast Asian country seeks a compromise with China, which is claiming parts of the South China Sea that are within Philippine territory, Marcos said, stressing that any agreement must not contravene his nation’s laws. While the Philippines and China could not agree on which nation’s law would apply, “we continue to explore, perhaps there can be other ways that we can do it,” Marcos
Prominent Chinese commentator Hu Xijin (胡錫進) on Sunday said that as China ponders its COVID-19 policies, epidemic experts need to speak out and China ought to conduct comprehensive research and make any studies transparent to the public. Hu’s unusual call on Chinese social media for candor and transparency earned him 34,000 likes on the popular Sina Weibo microblogging platform, as well as frank responses from commentators in a normally tightly policed Internet quick to censor voices deemed a risk to social stability. China’s top leaders warned in May amid the COVID-19 lockdown of Shanghai and widespread restrictions in the Chinese capital, Beijing,
Standing in line to try to buy food, Rekha Begum is distraught. Like many others in Bangladesh, she is struggling to find affordable daily essentials such as rice, lentils and onions. “I went to two other places, but they told me they don’t have supplies. Then I came here and stood at the end of the queue,” said Begum, 60, as she waited for nearly two hours to buy what she needed from a truck selling food at subsidized prices in the capital, Dhaka. Bangladesh’s economic miracle is under severe strain, as fuel price hikes amplify public frustrations over rising costs for