The Iraqi parliament on Thursday paved the way for a US pullout within three years — and a withdrawal from the streets of cities and towns by June next year — when it passed the landmark security pact setting a timetable for the US’ exit.
As many as 148 of the 198 members who turned up supported the historic motion, which for the first time prescribes a departure date and sets out declining duties for the US in the interim.
The Iraqi parliament consists of 275 members, up to 20 percent of whom are thought to have boycotted the vote, or missed it when the speaker convened an unscheduled session. The security pact between Baghdad and Washington was signed last week, but its implementation had remained uncertain until the decisive vote on the floor of the parliament on Thursday.
Deputy Speaker Khalid al-Attiyah, a close ally of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, said: “This is a historic day for parliament. More than three-quarters of those present at today’s session voted for the agreement, and that was not expected.”
The Shiite-led government’s strong showing was largely due to the support of the biggest Sunni bloc, which won one key concession that puts the vote to a national referendum before July 30.
The pact provides for, among other things: continued US special operations against al-Qaeda, coordinated with Iraq’s government; the transfer of control over Iraq’s airspace to Iraqi authorities; Iraqi jurisdiction over US forces and civilians in the country; and the transfer of any persons detained by the US to Iraqi authorities within 24 hours. It also specifies that Iraq not be used as a launching or transit point for attacks on other countries.
The Sunni bloc failed in a bid to tie in the repeal of a law which stripped loyalists of the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from the new government’s power base.
The influence of the Baathist regime that ruled Iraq under the executed former president has continued to dwindle since they were ousted from influential roles in the new government after the fall of Baghdad. Shiite and Kurdish factions were staunch backers of the deal, with the exception of the virulently anti-US bloc led by cleric Moqtadr al-Sadr.
The parliamentary vote appeared to clear another potential hurdle with Iraq’s leading Shiite cleric, the Iranian-backed Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, saying he would not oppose the deal if it was passed by a comfortable majority.
Supporters of the deal were confident that the strong showing in the parliament would be met by a similar vote among citizens. Shiites and Kurds account for 80 percent of Iraq’s 27 million residents.
Al-Maliki claimed the agreement was a key stepping stone toward Iraq gaining full sovereignty. More than five years after the US-led invasion, Washington still controls many of the key levers of power and works alongside the government.
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the
‘DOWNSIZE’: The Trump administration has initiated sweeping cuts to US government-funded media outlets in a move critics said could undermine the US’ global influence US President Donald Trump’s administration on Saturday began making deep cuts to Voice of America (VOA) and other government-run, pro-democracy programming, with the organization’s director saying all VOA employees have been put on leave. On Friday night, shortly after the US Congress passed its latest funding bill, Trump directed his administration to reduce the functions of several agencies to the minimum required by law. That included the US Agency for Global Media, which houses Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Asia and Radio Marti, which beams Spanish-language news into Cuba. On Saturday morning, Kari Lake, a former Arizona gubernatorial and US
Indonesia’s parliament yesterday amended a law to allow members of the military to hold more government roles, despite criticisms that it would expand the armed forces’ role in civilian affairs. The revision to the armed forces law, pushed mainly by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s coalition, was aimed at expanding the military’s role beyond defense in a country long influenced by its armed forces. The amendment has sparked fears of a return to the era of former Indonesian president Suharto, who ex-general Prabowo once served and who used military figures to crack down on dissent. “Now it’s the time for us to ask the
RSS