A federal judge ordered the US government to immediately free 17 Chinese Muslims from Guantanamo Bay into the US, a dramatic ruling that could set the course for releasing dozens of other prisoners from the US naval facility in Cuba.
The administration of US President George W. Bush criticized Tuesday’s decision as a threat to national security and quickly moved to block the decision in federal appeals court.
“Today’s ruling presents serious national security and separation of powers concerns and raises unprecedented legal issues,” Department of Justice Spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.
In a stern rebuke of the government, US District Judge Ricardo Urbina said it would be wrong to continue holding the detainees since they no longer are considered enemy combatants. The Uighurs have been in custody for almost seven years.
Over the objections of government lawyers who continued to cast the Uighurs as possible terror threats, Urbina ordered them to be released, in Washington, by Friday. It was the first court-ordered release of Guantanamo detainees since the prison camp opened in 2002.
“Because the Constitution prohibits indefinite detentions without cause, the continued detention is unlawful,” Urbina said, prompting cheers and applause from local Uighur residents and human rights activists packed into the US District courtroom.
Urbina, who was appointed to the bench by former president Bill Clinton, also ordered a hearing next week to decide where the Uighurs should be settled permanently. Until then, members of the Uighur community in the Washington area agreed to help care for them.
“I think the moment has arrived for the court to shine the light of constitutionality on the reasons for the detention,” he said.
Justice Department attorney John O’Quinn’s requested delay in the Uighurs’ release pending possible appeal was denied on Tuesday by Urbina, who said the detainees had waited long enough. Later on Tuesday, Roehrkasse said the government would seek to block the order in appeals court, alleging that the Uighurs had received weapons training at camps in Afghanistan.
“Although the United States no longer treats these Uighurs as ‘enemy combatants’ of the United States and has been seeking to transfer them out of Guantanamo Bay ... the government does not believe that it is appropriate to have these foreign nationals removed from government custody and released into the United States,” Roehrkasse said.
Urbina said once the detainees arrived in Washington, they would be free to move around unsupervised, drawing the surprise of government attorneys who suggested that immigration officials might act to take the men into custody upon their arrival.
That prompted an angry response from the judge, who said he would not “take kindly” to such a government move.
“That would be inappropriate,” Urbina said. “There is a pressing need to have these people, who have been incarcerated for seven years, to have those conditions changed.”
At issue is whether a federal judge has the authority to order the release of Guantanamo prisoners who were unlawfully detained by the US and cannot be sent back to their homeland. The Uighurs have been cleared for release from Guantanamo since 2004 and ordinarily would have been sent home.
Wang Baodong (王寶東), spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, reiterated Beijing’s argument that the Uighurs are terror suspects and should be returned to China.
“We ask the US side to take into serious consideration of [sic] the repeated requests of the Chinese side, and handle the issue in a prudent way so as not to further harm their bilateral cooperation on combating international terrorism,” Wang said.
The Bush administration has refused to turn the Uighurs over to China because they might face torture. The administration says it has found no other country willing to accept them. Albania accepted five Uighur detainees in 2006 but has since balked at taking others.
The Uighurs were captured in Pakistan and Afghanistan in 2001.
Urbina’s decision has broader implications for the future of the Guantanamo prison, which the Bush administration has said it wants to shut down after “working with other countries to take people back under the right circumstances.”
A federal judge is set to hold hearings this month on other Guantanamo prisoners challenging their detentions as so-called “enemy combatants.”
Roughly 20 percent of about 250 detainees who remain at the military prison fear torture or persecution should they return to their home countries, the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights says. Their concerns raise similar questions as to where they should go if other countries refuse to take them. The US has long maintained they should stay at Guantanamo.
Eleven people, including a former minister, were arrested in Serbia on Friday over a train station disaster in which 16 people died. The concrete canopy of the newly renovated station in the northern city of Novi Sad collapsed on Nov. 1, 2024 in a disaster widely blamed on corruption and poor oversight. It sparked a wave of student-led protests and led to the resignation of then-Serbian prime minister Milos Vucevic and the fall of his government. The public prosecutor’s office in Novi Sad opened an investigation into the accident and deaths. In February, the public prosecutor’s office for organized crime opened another probe into
RISING RACISM: A Japanese group called on China to assure safety in the country, while the Chinese embassy in Tokyo urged action against a ‘surge in xenophobia’ A Japanese woman living in China was attacked and injured by a man in a subway station in Suzhou, China, Japanese media said, hours after two Chinese men were seriously injured in violence in Tokyo. The attacks on Thursday raised concern about xenophobic sentiment in China and Japan that have been blamed for assaults in both countries. It was the third attack involving Japanese living in China since last year. In the two previous cases in China, Chinese authorities have insisted they were isolated incidents. Japanese broadcaster NHK did not identify the woman injured in Suzhou by name, but, citing the Japanese
RESTRUCTURE: Myanmar’s military has ended emergency rule and announced plans for elections in December, but critics said the move aims to entrench junta control Myanmar’s military government announced on Thursday that it was ending the state of emergency declared after it seized power in 2021 and would restructure administrative bodies to prepare for the new election at the end of the year. However, the polls planned for an unspecified date in December face serious obstacles, including a civil war raging over most of the country and pledges by opponents of the military rule to derail the election because they believe it can be neither free nor fair. Under the restructuring, Myanmar’s junta chief Min Aung Hlaing is giving up two posts, but would stay at the
YELLOW SHIRTS: Many protesters were associated with pro-royalist groups that had previously supported the ouster of Paetongtarn’s father, Thaksin, in 2006 Protesters rallied on Saturday in the Thai capital to demand the resignation of court-suspended Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and in support of the armed forces following a violent border dispute with Cambodia that killed more than three dozen people and displaced more than 260,000. Gathered at Bangkok’s Victory Monument despite soaring temperatures, many sang patriotic songs and listened to speeches denouncing Paetongtarn and her father, former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and voiced their backing of the country’s army, which has always retained substantial power in the Southeast Asian country. Police said there were about 2,000 protesters by mid-afternoon, although
RSS