Sat, Feb 07, 2004 page7

• CIA never called Iraq threat imminent

  PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE An intelligence chief's statements leave the door open for Democrats to raise more questions about the reasons that Bush led the US into the Iraq war

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Intelligence analysts never told President George W. Bush before the invasion of Iraq that then-president Saddam Hussein's rule posed an imminent threat, CIA Director George Tenet said in a heated defense of agency findings central to the decision to go to war.

  The urgency of the Iraqi threat was Bush's main argument for the war.

  But the president said on Thursday he still would have invaded Iraq if he'd known no weapons stockpiles existed -- adding a new element to the much-debated question of whether the US went to war based on faulty assumptions.

  

  George Tenet, director of the US Central Intelligence Agency, speaks at Georgetown University in Washington Thursday. In his first public defense of prewar intelligence, Tenet said US analysts never claimed before the war that Iraq posed an imminent threat.

  PHOTO: AP

  Tenet, addressing such questions for the first time after weeks of silence, acknowledged that analysts believed before the war that Saddam had chemical and biological weapons, although none have been found.

  He said he believes some of what US intelligence predicted about Iraq will turn out to have been right -- and some wrong -- as is often the case in such matters.

  He made clear that analysts differed among themselves all along on important aspects of Saddam's chemical, biological and nuclear programs and spelled out those disputes in an October 2002 intelligence estimate given to the White House.

  "They never said there was an imminent threat," Tenet said in a speech at Georgetown University. "Rather, they painted an objective assessment for our policy-makers of a brutal dictator who was continuing his efforts to deceive and build programs that might constantly surprise us and threaten our interests."

  Tenet's remarks hit back at his former special adviser on Iraqi weapons, David Kay, who said last month "we were almost all wrong" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The comments also seemed designed to inoculate the CIA from becoming a scapegoat in the fight over whether the war was justified.

  Speaking in Charleston, South Carolina, Bush acknowledged that the weapons have not been found, although investigators have discovered evidence of possible programs. He said the war was still justified.

  "Knowing what I knew then and knowing what I know today, America did the right thing in Iraq," Bush said.

  Tenet, in his 40-minute defense, never said in detail how the Bush administration, citing US intelligence, might have painted an inaccurate picture of Iraq's weapons arsenal.

  He insisted that the intelligence analysts had not tailored their findings for any political purpose.

  That leaves the door open for Democrats to demand more investigation and explanation, and for many to question the basis of the administration's pre-emptive strike doctrine.

  "It goes to the core of why a nation went to war," said Democratic presidential front-runner, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts.

  Before the war, Bush and his senior advisers made clear they viewed the threat from Saddam as urgent.

  In October 2002, Bush told an audience in Ohio that "the danger is already significant and it only grows worse with time. If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?"

  On Sept. 13, 2002, Bush said of Saddam: "He's a threat we must deal with as quickly as possible."

  White House aides have pointed out that Bush, while he cited the urgency of Saddam's threat, never specifically characterized the threat as "imminent."

  In his State of the Union address in January last year, Bush said: "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations would come too late."

  In general, the Bush administration before the war cited three main justifications for military action: preventing Iraq from using weapons of mass destruction, protecting America and liberating Iraq.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    LA Dodgers beat Braves to secure 7th straight win

  • 2

    Notes from Central Taiwan: Taiwan’s health system is going to erode, not collapse

  • 3

    PSG make final as Arsenal fall short

  • 4

    Taiwan celebrates V-E Day for first time

  • 5

    Taiwan lauds US House bills of support