China’s so-called “incentives” for Taiwan might be an attempt to blur the lines between politics and business, a trade academic said yesterday, adding that there is still the risk of sudden trade bans.
Feng Chia University international business professor Yang Ming-hsien (楊明憲) made the comment after China announced 10 “incentive measures” for Taiwan, including facilitating the sales of Taiwanese agricultural and fishery products and investments in China, and the promotion of the resumption of travel to Taiwan.
The measures came after Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on Friday.
Photo: Yang Yuan-ting, Taipei Times
International trade mechanisms typically allows the import of agricultural products as long as local quarantine standards are met, but China is also imposing political demands, such as adhering to the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposing “Taiwanese independence,” Yang said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
The political prerequisites imply that Taiwanese agricultural products were rejected by China solely due to political reasons, he said, adding that there could be a persistent risk of such arbitrary rejections.
Beijing might also require Taiwanese enterprises to register in China, which would mean that businesses would have to invest or establish local production facilities in China, Yang said.
However, as there is no investment protection agreement between Taiwan and China, issues such as labor recruitment, profit distribution and stakeholder interests in liquidation remain unaddressed, he added.
While the Chinese market is undeniably important, Taiwan’s agricultural trade should continue to diversify across different markets in light of these risks, he said.
Tunghai University Cross-Strait Research Center deputy executive director Hung Pu-chao (洪浦釗) said that when cross-strait interactions come with political prerequisites, exchanges cease to be neutral and instead operate strictly within that framework.
Such frameworks are not designed to facilitate acceptance, but rather to pressure the Taiwanese government through rejections, he said.
The true objective of China’s new policy is to sow division in Taiwan by creating a narrative that the government is “obstructing exchanges and hindering development,” Hung said.
China is attempting to establish a channel for dialogue that bypasses Taiwan’s democratically-elected government, with the goal of cultivating a specific perception: Any political party willing to accept China’s political framework can serve as a vehicle for cross-strait interaction, he said.
If this perception is accepted by other countries, it would impact the government’s representation and leadership in cross-strait affairs, and would become a national security concern, he added.
China’s political prerequisites show that exchanges, and its trade and economic measures are not simple interactions, he said.
Hung warned that constructing bridges from China to Kinmen and Lienchiang (Matsu) counties, and sharing airports and flight arrangements would result in a much deeper form of connectivity, and could impact Taiwan’s governance and national security.
More than half of the bamboo vipers captured in Tainan in the past few years were found in the city’s Sinhua District (新化), while other districts had smaller catches or none at all. Every year, Tainan captures about 6,000 snakes which have made their way into people’s homes. Of the six major venomous snakes in Taiwan, the cobra, the many-banded krait, the brown-spotted pit viper and the bamboo viper are the most frequently captured. The high concentration of bamboo vipers captured in Sinhua District is puzzling. Tainan Agriculture Bureau Forestry and Nature Conservation Division head Chu Chien-ming (朱健明) earlier this week said that the
NAMING SPAT: The foreign ministry called on Denmark to propose an acceptable solution to the erroneous nationality used for Taiwanese on residence permits Taiwan has revoked some privileges for Danish diplomatic staff over a Danish permit that lists “Taiwan” as “China,” Eric Huang (黃鈞耀), head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Department of European Affairs, told a news conference in Taipei yesterday. Reporters asked Huang whether the Danish government had responded to the ministry’s request that it correct the nationality on Danish residence permits of Taiwanese, which has been listed as “China” since 2024. Taiwan’s representative office in Denmark continues to communicate with the Danish government, and the ministry has revoked some privileges previously granted to Danish representatives in Taiwan and would continue to review
The first bluefin tuna of the season, brought to shore in Pingtung County and weighing 190kg, was yesterday auctioned for NT$10,600 (US$333.5) per kilogram, setting a record high for the local market. The auction was held at the fish market in Donggang Fishing Harbor, where the Siaoliouciou Island-registered fishing vessel Fu Yu Ching No. 2 delivered the “Pingtung First Tuna” it had caught for bidding. Bidding was intense, and the tuna was ultimately jointly purchased by a local restaurant and a local company for NT$10,600 per kilogram — NT$300 ,more than last year — for a total of NT$2.014 million. The 67-year-old skipper
China has reserved offshore airspace over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea from March 27 to May 6, issuing alerts that are usually used to warn of military exercises, although no such exercises have been announced, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Sunday. Reserving such a large area for 40 days without explanation is an “unusual step,” as military exercises normally only last a few days, the paper said. The alerts, known as notice to air missions (NOTAMs), “are intended to inform pilots and aviation authorities of temporary airspace hazards or restrictions,” the article said. The airspace reserved in the alert