Thu, Mar 26, 2026 page2

• KMT’s defense bill ‘highly unfeasible’: ex-KMT lawmaker

  • Staff writer, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A NT$380 billion (US$11.89 billion) spending cap on weapons systems approved by Washington for sale to Taiwan proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is “highly unfeasible” and should be raised to at least NT$800 billion, former KMT lawmaker Jason Hsu (許 毓仁) said yesterday.

  The KMT’s defense bill, under review at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, would fund eight systems announced by the US in December last year, with a follow-on budget proposed by the Ministry of National Defense in the event of new US arms sale packages.

  It is being considered alongside the Cabinet’s and Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) versions, which set the spending cap at NT$1.25 trillion and NT$400 billion, respectively.

  

  Former Chinese Nationalist Party legislator Jason Hsu attends a meeting in the legislature in Taipei in an undated photograph.

  Photo: Huang Ching-hsuan, Taipei Times

  As a former ruling party, the KMT should have known better than to propose a “highly unfeasible” budget for foreign arms procurement, Hsu said in a social media post.

  The bill’s phased budget planning approach contradicts the nature of foreign arms procurement packages, which are not made at random, but require a lengthy negotiation and assessment period between Taiwan and the US, said Hsu, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Washington-based think tank.

  With US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) scheduled to meet in just more than a month, Hsu said that time is not on Taiwan’s side.

  If the Legislative Yuan has not passed the special defense budget by then, Trump could make concessions on planned arms sales to Taiwan that the US Congress has yet to be notified of to secure certain terms with Xi, Hsu said.

  If that happens, Taiwan would not even receive letters of acceptance from the US, effectively denying the follow-on budget proposal route espoused by the KMT, he said.

  The KMT should raise the amount stipulated in its bill to between NT$800 billion and NT$900 billion, which would be more “practical,” Hsu said.

  As for the remaining NT$300 billion gap between the KMT’s and the Cabinet’s bills, Hsu said that could be gradually offset by adopting a general budget planning route.

  “The last thing I want to see is the review being stymied by an excessive gap between the ruling and opposition proposals,” Hsu said, adding that that could “lead to the Cabinet’s version being rejected in a floor vote through a joint opposition effort.”

  “Such an outcome would be a true disaster for Taiwan,” he said.

  The KMT bill’s exclusion of drone procurement, which is covered by the Cabinet’s bill, is “extremely dangerous” given China’s escalating “gray zone” coercion and other potential military actions to take Taiwan, Hsu said.

  Later in the day, President William Lai (賴清德) also noted the omission of drones and artificial intelligence-assisted command and control systems in the KMT’s and TPP’s bills.

  Excluding these critical systems shows the opposition’s lack of understanding of modern warfare, Lai said at a Democratic Progressive Party Central Standing Committee meeting in Taipei, calling on nonpartisan support for the Cabinet’s “comprehensive” special defense budget bill.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    TSMC shares stumble on report, but losses minor

  • 3

    Navy needs 12 subs for modern fleet: CSBC head

  • 4

    Snake on a train spooks riders on Taipei MRT line

  • 5

    HIMARS to be deployed to islands