A Canadian public policy institute has urged the Ottawa government to drop its long-standing diplomatic ambiguity over Taiwan’s status and take a clear stance in support of Taiwan’s sovereignty and democracy.
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI), an Ottawa-based domestic and foreign policy think tank, made the recommendation in a report by Scott Simon released on Tuesday, the day after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party won the federal election, but fell short of securing a parliamentary majority.
“Canada needs clarity about the international status of Taiwan in order to recalibrate policies in changing circumstances,” the report’s executive summary said.
Photo: Reuters
The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) intention to “annex Taiwan, which it has never controlled” represents a “substantial risk” to Canada, it said.
Canada’s approach to China’s claim over Taiwan has relied on what it called “diplomatic expediency,” the institute said, adding that since establishing ties with the PRC in 1970, Canada has only agreed to “take note” of Beijing’s position on Taiwan, while neither endorsing nor challenging it.
Canadian courts have treated Taiwan as a de facto state in legal rulings, despite the lack of formal diplomatic recognition, and “Canadian policy is already based on the knowledge that Taiwan is completely autonomous from PRC rule,” the report said.
Taiwan “meets all the criteria for statehood” under the Montevideo Convention, the institute said, referring to a 1933 international treaty that defines a state as having a permanent population, defined territory, government and capacity to enter into relations with other states.
The PRC is “trying to convince the world that Taiwan has always been an integral part of China” by claiming that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 gave it sovereignty over Taiwan, the report said, calling the claim “blatant misinformation.”
“The resolution does not even mention Taiwan,” it said.
China’s legal strategy — described as “international lawfare” — is designed to prevent the UN from supporting Taiwan in the event of conflict, as it did with Ukraine following the 2022 Russian invasion, it said.
The report urged Ottawa to publicly distinguish between Canada’s “one China policy” and the “one China principle” that the PRC “wants to impose on the world.”
“Canada has the right to define that policy and determine our own relationship with Taiwan without external interference,” it said.
The institute also called on the Canadian government to conduct regular naval transits of the Taiwan Strait, which it said constitute international waters under international law, and to assert the importance of peace and freedom of navigation in the region as a global public good.
The report further recommended increased cooperation with Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and the Philippines on defense, law enforcement and intelligence sharing to “collectively deter Chinese aggressive actions.”
To bolster Taiwan’s economic resilience, the institute advised expanding bilateral trade and investment in critical areas, such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and strategic mineral and energy supply chains.
Such efforts would help “lay the groundwork for the people of Taiwan to eventually fully exercise their right to self determination as promised in international law,” it said.
Taiwan would benefit from more integrated military strategies and deployments if the US and its allies treat the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as a “single theater of operations,” a Taiwanese military expert said yesterday. Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said he made the assessment after two Japanese military experts warned of emerging threats from China based on a drill conducted this month by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command. Japan Institute for National Fundamentals researcher Maki Nakagawa said the drill differed from the
‘WORSE THAN COMMUNISTS’: President William Lai has cracked down on his political enemies and has attempted to exterminate all opposition forces, the chairman said The legislature would motion for a presidential recall after May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday at a protest themed “against green communists and dictatorship” in Taipei. Taiwan is supposed to be a peaceful homeland where people are united, but President William Lai (賴清德) has been polarizing and tearing apart society since his inauguration, Chu said. Lai must show his commitment to his job, otherwise a referendum could be initiated to recall him, he said. Democracy means the rule of the people, not the rule of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but Lai has failed to fulfill his
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by
A rally held by opposition parties yesterday demonstrates that Taiwan is a democratic country, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, adding that if opposition parties really want to fight dictatorship, they should fight it on Tiananmen Square in Beijing. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a protest with the theme “against green communists and dictatorship,” and was joined by the Taiwan People’s Party. Lai said the opposition parties are against what they called the “green communists,” but do not fight against the “Chinese communists,” adding that if they really want to fight dictatorship, they should go to the right place and face