Sun, Mar 30, 2025 page2

• Legality of referendums needs discussion: CEC

  UNPRECEDENTED: It would be the first time that a referendum has been initiated by the legislature rather than parties or civic groups, which entails different rules

  • Staff writer, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Whether two referendum proposals submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) align with legal definitions in the Referendum Act (公民投票法) needs to be discussed from a broader perspective, the Central Election Commission (CEC) said on Friday.

  The issue needs “collective consideration and review from multiple perspectives” in society, it said in a statement.

  On Tuesday, the Legislature passed a motion advancing the KMT’s proposals to a second reading without committee review.

  

  The logo of the Central Election Commission is pictured in an undated photograph.

  Photo: Taipei Times file photo

  The proposed referendums are aimed at asking voters their views on capital punishment, which is legal in Taiwan, although rarely enforced; and on “martial law,” which evokes the 38-year period of authoritarian KMT rule prior to Taiwan’s democratization beginning in the late 1980s.

  The referendum proposal framed as “opposing the abolition of the death penalty” would ask voters: “Do you agree that judges in a collegiate panel at all levels of courts do not need unanimous agreement to sentence a defendant to the death penalty?”

  The referendum proposal “opposing martial law” would ask: “Do you agree the government should avoid war and prevent Taiwan from becoming a place of martial law, where youth die and homes are destroyed, as in Ukraine?”

  The KMT’s move to put the two issues to a public vote would be the first time a referendum is initiated by the legislature rather than by political parties or civic groups.

  Such proposals are limited to initiatives or referendums on major policies, according to the Referendum Act, while proposals submitted by political parties and civic groups can also include initiatives on legislative principles and referendums on laws.

  CEC Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) on March 21 said the opposition party’s proposed referendum questions “would have no effect even if passed,” because asking the government not to implement a policy that does not currently exist is illogical.

  The act stipulates that referendum proposals must pertain to significant policy changes, either by introducing new policies or reversing existing ones, Lee said.

  “The CEC hopes that the first referendum proposal submitted by the legislature will proceed in full compliance with the law,” he said, adding that the issue “requires collective consideration and review from multiple perspectives.”

  It was not clear if Lee had seen the actual questions proposed at the time, as the question proposed on the death penalty is not consistent with its public framing.

  On Friday, Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers occupied the podium at the legislature in an attempt to block the confirmation of the meeting minutes from Tuesday.

  However, their action was in vain, as Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) did not show up to announce the start of the session, meaning that it did not take place.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Investors diversify from TSMC to other winners of AI boom

  • 2

    Taiwan eyes 100,000 drones a month

  • 3

    HSR malfunction causes delays, reduced service

  • 4

    Japan ‘mystery illness’ not new: CDC

  • 5

    Nvidia’s Jensen Huang arrives in Taiwan