A proposal to abolish the recently promulgated Act Promoting Development for Strong Generation Policies and Industries (壯世代政策與產業發展促進法) was approved for committee review by the Legislative Yuan this morning.
The act was heavily promoted by former Taiwan People’s Party legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城), who resigned from his post at the end of last month over conflicts of interest related to the bill.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Pei-yu (陳培瑜) is leading the proposal to abolish the act.
Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times
The proposal claims that the term “strong generation” does not align with internationally or domestically established generational categories and could result in overlapping government policies.
The act defines the “strong generation” as those aged 55 or older with the ability and willingness to work, and stipulates that the government is responsible for putting in place policies to help that generation lead a better life.
There is little research or precedent internationally or domestically that supports a generational divide at the age of 55, the proposal said.
Policies by the UN and International Labour Organization (ILO) define those aged 45 to 65 as middle-aged and those 65 and over as elderly, it said.
International organizations and major countries have never used the term “strong generation” or defined those aged 55 and older as a distinct generation, the proposal said.
In addition, Taiwan has previously implemented legislation that promotes the employment and quality of life of the middle-aged and elderly generations, it said.
For example, the Middle-aged and Elderly Employment Promotion Act (中高齡者及高齡者就業促進法) was promulgated in 2019.
The Executive Yuan also revised Taiwan’s white paper on its aging society in 2021, and proposed a plan to respond to the challenges of a super-aging society based on it, the proposal said.
The definitions of the middle-aged and elderly generations in these policies align with those of the UN and ILO, the proposal said, emphasizing that these definitions differ from the “strong generation.”
The term “strong generation” does not connect with international standards and would therefore be challenging for the Executive Yuan to implement, the proposal said, adding that Taiwanese society does not have a common understanding of the term, making it easy to confuse with existing concepts.
The act should be abolished to prevent redundant administrative work, uphold the multicultural diversity of public terminology and eliminate concerns over potential misuse of the term by individuals with ulterior motives, it said.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS