The High Court today dismissed a case in which two people allegedly paid others to post criticism of the Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office’s Osaka branch over its handling of evacuations from Japan following a 2018 typhoon.
This came after the Constitutional Court last year ruled that insulting public officials is punishable under the Constitution, while defaming a public office is not, sending the case back to the High Court for a retrial.
The case, dubbed the “Kansai Airport incident,” involved Yang Hui-ju (楊蕙如), who was indicted over comments online that accused the office of failing to offer timely help to Taiwanese in Japan during Typhoon Jebi, which made landfall in Japan on Sept. 4, 2018.
Photo: Wen Yu-te, Taipei Times
Yang allegedly instructed Tsai Fu-ming (蔡福明) and others to generate discussion on PTT about the event.
Su Chii-cherng (蘇啟誠), who was director-general of the office at the time, committed suicide at his residence eight days later.
In the first trial, Yang and Tsai were each sentenced to six months in jail, commutable to a fine of NT$180,000, for contravening Article 140 of the Criminal Code.
Article 140 stipulates a prison sentence of up to one year or a fine of up to NT$100,000 for “insult[ing] a public official during the discharge of his legal duties or publicly mak[ing] insults about his discharge of such legal duties.”
Yang and Tsai appealed to the High Court, which sentenced them each to five months in jail, commutable to a fine of NT$150,000.
The former ruling sentenced Yang and Tsai for defaming a public office, while the second ruling found them guilty of defaming a public official during the discharge of their duties.
Yang then sought a constitutional interpretation, saying that Article 140 contravenes constitutionally guaranteed free speech.
The Constitutional Court said that Article 140 has two parts, one referring to “slandering or defaming a public official” and one to “slandering or defaming a public office,” and ruled that the first part is punishable under the law while the second part is not.
The High Court then said that after the interpretation, punishments for “slandering or defaming a public official” have “lost their effectiveness.”
It therefore revoked its original ruling, saying the two offenses are no longer punishable.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on