During a trip to Taiwan last year, US Congressman Mike Waltz said that the US needed to embrace “strategic clarity” and spell out to China that an invasion of the country would be met with a strong US response.
Now that he is US president-elect Donald Trump’s incoming national security adviser, Waltz is beginning to see the value in ambiguity.
After more than 24 years in the US military, Waltz built his reputation in Washington as a China hawk, working on a US House of Representatives task force to coordinate policy toward Beijing.
Photo: Bloomberg
He introduced bills to prevent federal retirement funds from being invested in China’s military, decrease US dependence on critical minerals from China and make the protection of Taiwan a specific goal for the US military.
In an interview with Bloomberg News last year, Waltz, 50, said that the biggest deterrent for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) would be for the US and its allies to clearly state that they would come to the nation’s aid.
“I really think increasingly we need to move from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity,” Waltz said in an interview in April last year in Seoul.
“If we don’t come to the aid of Taiwan, what does that then mean to Japan, South Korea and the Philippines? It means they start questioning their alliance with us and our commitment to them — and therefore, what I think it ultimately will mean is a nuclear Japan and a nuclear South Korea, because they will have to take matters into their own hands,” he said.
There is just one problem. Waltz’s new boss swept back to the White House as voters embraced his America First-branded approach to foreign policy, prioritizing domestic manufacturing and avoiding foreign entanglements.
That is bad news for Taiwan, which has long been the biggest flashpoint between the world’s two superpowers, and home to massive semiconductor manufacturing facilities that Trump and Democrats alike are eager to return to US shores.
Now, Waltz faces the unenviable task of reconciling his views with that of his boss — under the watchful eye of an Indo-Pacific region that has been shaken in recent years, as Beijing seeks to project its military might and test the US’ resolve with increased drills around Taiwan.
A spokesperson for Waltz in a statement said that “President Trump will keep all options on the table in the Indo-Pacific and Representative Waltz will carry out the policies that are in line with the president’s agenda.”
That comment is a notable departure from Waltz’s remarks during the congressional delegation trip to Taiwan, South Korea and Japan last year, when he cited the importance of arming Taiwan more rapidly and selling the US people on the significance of defending it.
“I feel like we’re in a race against time,” he told Bloomberg last year. “The intelligence community is blinking red, yet the bureaucracy within our national security community is kind of plodding along.”
Implicit in the tonal shift is an acknowledgment that Trump — who has described Taiwan as “the apple of Xi’s eye” — largely sees Taiwan as a mooch that stole a key industry while relying on the US for security.
“They did take about 100 percent of our chip business,” Trump said in an interview in June with Bloomberg. “Taiwan should pay us for defense. You know, we’re no different than an insurance company. Taiwan doesn’t give us anything.”
Trump’s comments spurred a frenzy in Taipei, where officials sought to clarify their intentions and the administration of President William Lai (賴清德) has since discussed ways to appease the incoming US president through weapons and energy purchases they plan to announce when Trump takes office, people familiar with the matter said.
However, Waltz’s tight-rope act has already begun.
Last week, he met with Taiwanese officials at an event in Washington.
People familiar with the conversation said that it was an informal gathering that was not organized through the transition and that they did not have an in-depth policy discussion.
Still, one person familiar with the conversation expressed confidence that Waltz would maintain his pro-Taiwan stance and that Washington and Taipei would have open channels of dialogue on security cooperation.
Central to the brewing policy debate is whether to alter the so-called “one China” policy and the Taiwan Relations Act.
US President Joe Biden shook that equilibrium when he said more than once he would defend Taiwan militarily if China invaded.
Trump told the Wall Street Journal editorial board in October that he would handle the issue by telling Xi he would impose 150 to 200 percent tariffs on China if he went “into Taiwan.”
When asked if he would use military force against a blockade of Taiwan, he answered: “I wouldn’t have to, because he respects me and he knows I’m f— crazy.”
A person familiar with Waltz’s current thinking said he now believes that it likely would not even come to a military confrontation because the US and China would hash it out through economic competition.
Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said the tension boils down to Trump prizing unpredictability because it can increase leverage, while the US Congress — particularly Republicans — have traditionally favored predictability with Taiwan.
“Incoming administration officials coming from the Congress will have to adjudicate between president-elect Trump’s preference for unpredictability and their past statements favoring clear support for Taiwan,” he added.
Beijing could eventually see a full amphibious invasion of Taiwan as the only "prudent" way to bring about unification, the US Department of Defense said in a newly released annual report to Congress. The Pentagon's "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2025," was in many ways similar to last year’s report but reorganized the analysis of the options China has to take over Taiwan. Generally, according to the report, Chinese leaders view the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) capabilities for a Taiwan campaign as improving, but they remain uncertain about its readiness to successfully seize
Taiwan is getting a day off on Christmas for the first time in 25 years. The change comes after opposition parties passed a law earlier this year to add or restore five public holidays, including Constitution Day, which falls on today, Dec. 25. The day marks the 1947 adoption of the constitution of the Republic of China, as the government in Taipei is formally known. Back then the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) governed China from Nanjing. When the KMT, now an opposition party in Taiwan, passed the legislation on holidays, it said that they would help “commemorate the history of national development.” That
Taiwan has overtaken South Korea this year in per capita income for the first time in 23 years, IMF data showed. Per capita income is a nation’s GDP divided by the total population, used to compare average wealth levels across countries. Taiwan also beat Japan this year on per capita income, after surpassing it for the first time last year, US magazine Newsweek reported yesterday. Across Asia, Taiwan ranked fourth for per capita income at US$37,827 this year due to sustained economic growth, the report said. In the top three spots were Singapore, Macau and Hong Kong, it said. South
Snow fell on Yushan (Jade Mountain, 玉山) yesterday morning as a continental cold air mass sent temperatures below freezing on Taiwan’s tallest peak, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said. Snowflakes were seen on Yushan’s north peak from 6:28am to 6:38am, but they did not fully cover the ground and no accumulation was recorded, the CWA said. As of 7:42am, the lowest temperature recorded across Taiwan was minus-5.5°C at Yushan’s Fengkou observatory and minus-4.7°C at the Yushan observatory, CWA data showed. On Hehuanshan (合歡山) in Nantou County, a low of 1.3°C was recorded at 6:39pm, when ice pellets fell at Songsyue Lodge (松雪樓), a
RSS