A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday.
It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said.
The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Friday last week, Tien said.
Photo: CNA
A Chinese foreign ministry statement after the meeting said that “Singapore fully understands the Chinese government’s position on the Taiwan question, opposes any form of Taiwan independence, and firmly abides by the one China principle.”
However, a separate statement issued by the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the meeting said that “Singapore has a clear and consistent one China policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence.”
The difference between the two statements and Beijing replacing the phrase “one China policy” with “one China principle” was further proof of the PRC’s “disinformation warfare,” Tien said.
Earlier, lawmakers at a legislative session asked why Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on Saturday last week criticizing Beijing’s statement on the Xi-Wong meeting.
China’s statement concerning Taiwan was “unmistakably false,” the MOFA said.
Chang Ching (張競), a retired navy captain and a Taipei-based research fellow with the Society for Strategic Studies, ROC think tank, accused the MOFA of mischaracterizing the Singapore statement.
Singapore wrote that it followed “one China” and “opposed Taiwan independence,” Chang said, prompting lawmakers’ questions.
“The one China principle” is the position held by the PRC and the Chinese Communist Party that there is only one sovereign state under the name China, with the PRC serving as the sole legitimate government of that China, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of that China.
Some countries that have diplomatic ties with the PRC have their own versions of a “one China” policy instead of following Beijing’s “one China principle.”
The “policies” generally do not overtly accept that Taiwan is a part of China, as is the case with the “principle.”
For example, the US says its “one China” policy is guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the Three Joint Communiques and the “six assurances.”
“We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means. We continue to have an abiding interest in peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” the US Department of State says on its Web site.
Singapore’s cross-strait policy is similar to that of the US, with Singapore’s leaders saying that the city-state maintains a “one China” policy and opposes Taiwanese independence.
It has ambiguous wording to describe its policy, except for a joint statement released by Singapore and the PRC in April 2000.
“Singapore recognizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is part of China. The government of the Republic of Singapore recognizes the government of the People’s Republic of China,” the statement said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
A magnitude 4.1 earthquake struck eastern Taiwan's Hualien County at 2:23pm today, according to the Central Weather Administration (CWA). The epicenter of the temblor was 5.4 kilometers northeast of Hualien County Hall, at a depth of 34.9 km, according to the CWA. The earthquake's intensity, which gauges the actual effect of a temblor, was the highest in Hualien County, where it measured 2 on Taiwan's 7-tier intensity scale. The quake also measured an intensity of 1 in Yilan county, Taichung, Nantou County, Changhua County and Yunlin County, the CWA said. There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries.