A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday.
It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said.
The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Friday last week, Tien said.
Photo: CNA
A Chinese foreign ministry statement after the meeting said that “Singapore fully understands the Chinese government’s position on the Taiwan question, opposes any form of Taiwan independence, and firmly abides by the one China principle.”
However, a separate statement issued by the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the meeting said that “Singapore has a clear and consistent one China policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence.”
The difference between the two statements and Beijing replacing the phrase “one China policy” with “one China principle” was further proof of the PRC’s “disinformation warfare,” Tien said.
Earlier, lawmakers at a legislative session asked why Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on Saturday last week criticizing Beijing’s statement on the Xi-Wong meeting.
China’s statement concerning Taiwan was “unmistakably false,” the MOFA said.
Chang Ching (張競), a retired navy captain and a Taipei-based research fellow with the Society for Strategic Studies, ROC think tank, accused the MOFA of mischaracterizing the Singapore statement.
Singapore wrote that it followed “one China” and “opposed Taiwan independence,” Chang said, prompting lawmakers’ questions.
“The one China principle” is the position held by the PRC and the Chinese Communist Party that there is only one sovereign state under the name China, with the PRC serving as the sole legitimate government of that China, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of that China.
Some countries that have diplomatic ties with the PRC have their own versions of a “one China” policy instead of following Beijing’s “one China principle.”
The “policies” generally do not overtly accept that Taiwan is a part of China, as is the case with the “principle.”
For example, the US says its “one China” policy is guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the Three Joint Communiques and the “six assurances.”
“We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means. We continue to have an abiding interest in peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” the US Department of State says on its Web site.
Singapore’s cross-strait policy is similar to that of the US, with Singapore’s leaders saying that the city-state maintains a “one China” policy and opposes Taiwanese independence.
It has ambiguous wording to describe its policy, except for a joint statement released by Singapore and the PRC in April 2000.
“Singapore recognizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is part of China. The government of the Republic of Singapore recognizes the government of the People’s Republic of China,” the statement said.
Prosecutors in New Taipei City yesterday indicted 31 individuals affiliated with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for allegedly forging thousands of signatures in recall campaigns targeting three Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The indictments stem from investigations launched earlier this year after DPP lawmakers Su Chiao-hui (蘇巧慧) and Lee Kuen-cheng (李坤城) filed criminal complaints accusing campaign organizers of submitting false signatures in recall petitions against them. According to the New Taipei District Prosecutors Office, a total of 2,566 forged recall proposal forms in the initial proposer petition were found during the probe. Among those
ECHOVIRUS 11: The rate of enterovirus infections in northern Taiwan increased last week, with a four-year-old girl developing acute flaccid paralysis, the CDC said Two imported cases of chikungunya fever were reported last week, raising the total this year to 13 cases — the most for the same period in 18 years, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said yesterday. The two cases were a Taiwanese and a foreign national who both arrived from Indonesia, CDC Epidemic Intelligence Center Deputy Director Lee Chia-lin (李佳琳) said. The 13 cases reported this year are the most for the same period since chikungunya was added to the list of notifiable communicable diseases in October 2007, she said, adding that all the cases this year were imported, including 11 from
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) today condemned the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) after the Czech officials confirmed that Chinese agents had surveilled Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) during her visit to Prague in March last year. Czech Military Intelligence director Petr Bartovsky yesterday said that Chinese operatives had attempted to create the conditions to carry out a demonstrative incident involving Hsiao, going as far as to plan a collision with her car. Hsiao was vice president-elect at the time. The MAC said that it has requested an explanation and demanded a public apology from Beijing. The CCP has repeatedly ignored the desires