Tussles between governing and opposition lawmakers in the past few weeks over legislative reform bills are likely to continue at the main chamber of the legislature in Taipei when debate resumes tomorrow.
Lawmakers stopped the review of several reform bills at about midnight on Friday as Legislative Speaker Han Kuo- yu (韓國瑜) announced the end of the day’s plenary session at 11:28pm, and said the proceedings would resume tomorrow.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) describes the legislative reforms bills as “an unconstitutional abuse of power,” while opposition parties say reforms would enable better oversight of the Executive Yuan.
Photo: Ritchie B. Tongo, EPA-EFE
The opposition says that reform is needed to create a better balance of power between the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan. It also says that the changes are in line with previous proposals by the DPP.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its opposition partner, the Taiwan People’s Party, say the bills would create more transparency and make the government more accountable. Opposition lawmakers say that in the past officials have deliberately dodged their questions during regular appearances in the legislature, falling short in their duty to explain their actions and policies.
The opposition wants the legislature to have the power to require government officials, the military, private entities and private individuals to provide witness testimony and documents to assist in probes.
Individuals or entities that do not comply could be repeatedly fined as much as NT$100,000. If statements provided by officials asked to provide testimony are found to be false, those persons could be fined between NT$20,000 and NT$200,000 with the approval of the legislature.
The law would also require the president to make an annual state of the nation address in front of lawmakers and answer questions on the spot.
The DPP and its supporters say the changes to the law amount to legislative overreach. They say the bill has been rushed though committees and their feedback ignored, an accusation the opposition denies, stating the bills all went through the committee, cross-caucus negotiations and public hearings.
One of the DPP’s chief concerns is that the bill could be weaponized to disrupt President William Lai’s (賴清德) government. The expansion of the legislature’s investigative powers opens the possibility of a single lawmaker being able to request all manner of sensitive or confidential information about the government’s operations, including military matters, the DPP said.
That could bog down the government in constant probes and possibly legal cases. Critics also worry it greatly increases the risk of confidential information being leaked.
The opposition says such concern is a non-issue as any lawmaker who leaks information would be held legally accountable.
On Taiwan’s relations with China, the Constitution says that cross-strait relations and national defense are the president’s responsibilities. The ability to question and request information from the president could give the legislature greater oversight of relations with China. The opponents of the bill says this would infringe upon the president’s ability to manage cross-strait relations and is therefore unconstitutional.
Regarding how Lai could respond to the law, he could ask the 15 justices of the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If the court declares the law unconstitutional, it would immediately become invalid.
However, Lai cannot ask the court to intervene until the legislation formally becomes law. The court has a history of moving slowly, meaning Lai’s government would probably start facing probes in the legislature before the court is able to act.
He could also stall. Once passed, the legislature would send the law to the Cabinet, which has the option to send it back to lawmakers to be reassessed in a process that could stretch to several weeks. Eventually, the Cabinet would have to pass Lai the law to sign.
He does not have a veto, but Taiwan politics could still find itself in an unprecedented situation should he refuse to sign the legislation. In the event of such an impasse, the Constitutional Court would likely be asked to rule on what should happen next. It has not shied away from making difficult interpretations in the past, such as in 2017 when it ruled that laws must be changed to allow gay marriage.
Lai would also have the nuclear option: Seeking to dissolve the legislature. Under Taiwan law, DPP lawmakers could file a no-confidence motion against their own premier, relieving him of his duties. The outgoing premier could then ask the president to dismiss the legislature.
If Lai did this, the political costs would likely be astronomical. Not only would he be sacrificing his own premier, he would anger voters across the nation for booting from office the lawmakers they elected just this January.
Regarding the impact on markets, it is rare for domestic political confrontations to make a ripple. The benchmark TAIEX remained stable during the Sunflower movement in 2014, during which protesters opposing a trade deal with China occupied parliament for several weeks.
So far, the past week’s protests have done little to stir investor concerns: The stock market hit new record highs in the two days following Tuesday’s initial protests, and the New Taiwan dollar’s moves have been muted.
A magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck off the coast of Yilan County at 8:39pm tonight, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said, with no immediate reports of damage or injuries. The epicenter was 38.7km east-northeast of Yilan County Hall at a focal depth of 98.3km, the CWA’s Seismological Center said. The quake’s maximum intensity, which gauges the actual physical effect of a seismic event, was a level 4 on Taiwan’s 7-tier intensity scale, the center said. That intensity level was recorded in Yilan County’s Nanao Township (南澳), Hsinchu County’s Guansi Township (關西), Nantou County’s Hehuanshan (合歡山) and Hualien County’s Yanliao (鹽寮). An intensity of 3 was
Instead of focusing solely on the threat of a full-scale military invasion, the US and its allies must prepare for a potential Chinese “quarantine” of Taiwan enforced through customs inspections, Stanford University Hoover fellow Eyck Freymann said in a Foreign Affairs article published on Wednesday. China could use various “gray zone” tactics in “reconfiguring the regional and ultimately the global economic order without a war,” said Freymann, who is also a nonresident research fellow at the US Naval War College. China might seize control of Taiwan’s links to the outside world by requiring all flights and ships entering or leaving Taiwan
The next minimum wage hike is expected to exceed NT$30,000, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday during an award ceremony honoring “model workers,” including migrant workers, at the Presidential Office ahead of Workers’ Day today. Lai said he wished to thank the awardees on behalf of the nation and extend his most sincere respect for their hard work, on which Taiwan’s prosperity has been built. Lai specifically thanked 10 migrant workers selected for the award, saying that although they left their home countries to further their own goals, their efforts have benefited Taiwan as well. The nation’s industrial sector and small businesses lay
Taiwan's first indigenous defense submarine, the SS-711 Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), departed for its 13th sea trial at 7am today, marking its seventh submerged test, with delivery to the navy scheduled for July. The outing also marked its first sea deployment since President William Lai (賴清德) boarded the submarine for an inspection on March 19, drawing a crowd of military enthusiasts who gathered to show support. The submarine this morning departed port accompanied by CSBC Corp’s Endeavor Manta (奮進魔鬼魚號) uncrewed surface vessel and a navy M109 assault boat. Amid public interest in key milestones such as torpedo-launching operations and overnight submerged trials,
RSS