Ten properties worth more than NT$200 million (US$6.21 million) in total that were taken from political prisoners during Taiwan’s White Terror era have been returned to the families of the victims over the past year, a foundation said yesterday.
The White Terror era refers to the suppression of political dissidents following the 228 Incident, an uprising that began on Feb. 28, 1947, which was brutally suppressed by the then-Chinese Nationalist Pary (KMT) regime. The government subsequently imposed martial law, which was lifted on July 15, 1987.
Yesterday was Taiwan’s first White Terror Memorial Day. Outgoing Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) last month announced that it would be observed annually on May 19.
Photo: Chen Yi-shan, Taipei Times
“The return of confiscated property to the families of political prisoners is an important step toward the restoration of rights,” Restoration of Victim’s Rights Infringed by Illegal Acts of the State During the Period of Authoritarian Rule Foundation chairperson Chang Wen-chen (張文貞) said.
Confiscated buildings and land still registered as state property would be returned to victims’ families whenever legally possible, such as when the properties become vacant or are being rented, she said, adding that in many cases the original owners of the properties were unjustly killed or imprisoned.
The foundation was set up by the Executive Yuan in line with the Act to Restore Victims’ Rights Infringed by Illegal Acts of the State During the Period of Authoritarian Rule (威權統治時期國家不法行為被害者權利回復條例).
Since September last year, when the foundation was established, it has returned 10 properties, Chang said.
Political prisoners who had their property taken during the Martial Law era were often charged with crimes under the now-repealed Punishment of Rebellion Act (懲治叛亂條例), she said.
Article 8 of the Punishment of Rebellion Act stipulated that anyone found guilty of crimes described in it would have their property confiscated, excluding what was necessary to cover the living expenses of that person’s dependent family members.
One property that was returned to a victim’s victim’s spouse and children over the past year was a building in Kaohsiung that was being rented out by the government, Chang said.
The family’s original ownership of the property was confirmed, and the Ministry of the Interior authorized the transfer, she said.
“There was also a really special case of a political prisoner who is still alive and was able to have his property returned to him,” she said. “The man was very young when he was arrested and his property was taken from him. Now he is in 80s.”
Foundation CEO Sun Pin (孫斌) said that during the Martial Law era, confiscated properties would change hands within the government.
After the state confiscated the property it would first be registered to the Taiwan Garrison Command, he said, adding that if the Taiwan Garrison Command did not want to use the property, it would be transferred to the National Property Administration or local government.
In one case, involving writer, human rights activist and former political prisoner Bo Yang (柏楊), books rather than real-estate were confiscated, but were lost, Sun said.
The foundation gave Bo’s family NT$6,000 for the books, he said.
“Although only books were confiscated from Bo Yang, the case has special symbolic significance. The family members believed that everything the country took from Bo should be returned,” he said.
A strong continental cold air mass is to bring pollutants to Taiwan from tomorrow, the Ministry of Environment said today, as it issued an “orange” air quality alert for most of the country. All of Taiwan except for Hualien and Taitung counties is to be under an “orange” air quality alert tomorrow, indicating air quality that is unhealthy for sensitive groups. In China, areas from Shandong to Shanghai have been enveloped in haze since Saturday, the ministry said in a news release. Yesterday, hourly concentrations of PM2.5 in these areas ranged from 65 to 160 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m³), and pollutants were
Taiwan’s armed forces have established response protocols for a wide range of sudden contingencies, including the “Wan Chun Plan” to protect the head of state, the Ministry of Defense (MND) said today. After US President Donald Trump on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, concerns have been raised as to whether China would launch a similar “decapitation strike” on Taiwan. The armed forces regularly coordinate with relevant agencies and practice drills to ensure preparedness for a wide range of scenarios, Vice Minister of National Defense Hsu Szu-chien (徐斯儉) told reporters before a
EVA Airways on Saturday said that it had suspended a pilot and opened an investigation after he allegedly lost his temper and punched the first officer several times as their plane was taxiing before takeoff at Los Angeles International Airport. According to a report published on Thursday by The Reporter, the incident occurred after the flight’s Malaysian first officer tried to warn the Taiwanese pilot, surnamed Wen (文), that he was taxiing faster than the speed limit of 30 knots (55.6kph). After alerting the pilot several times without response, the first officer manually applied the brakes in accordance with standard operating
NOT AN OPENING: Trump’s violation of international law does not affect China’s consideration in attacking Taiwan; Beijing lacks capability, not precedent, an official said Taiwanese officials see the US’ capture of the president of Venezuela as a powerful deterrent to Beijing’s aggression and a timely reminder of the US’ ability to defeat militaries equipped with Chinese-made weapons. The strikes that toppled Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro signaled to authoritarian leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), US President Donald Trump’s willingness to use military might for international affairs core to US interests, one senior official in Taipei’s security circle said. That reassured Taiwan, the person said. Taipei has also dismissed the idea that Trump’s apparent violation of international law could embolden Beijing, said the official, who was not