The Taipei City Government on Wednesday said it is investigating National Taiwan Normal University Veterinary Hospital over accusations that a vet accidentally killed a dog by administering anesthesia without the owner’s authorization, with the results to be shared later this month.
Taipei City Councilor Angela Ying (應曉薇) convened a news conference earlier in the day with the owner of the dog, surnamed Chang (張).
Chang said she took her pomeranian, Micky, to the hospital’s behavioral clinic on July 24.
Photo: Tsai Ya-hua, Taipei Times
A vet surnamed Wang (王) said they would make the dog “comfortable and well-behaved” while drawing blood, she said.
Shortly afterward, Micky went into shock and died, Chang said, adding that she later discovered that Wang had administered anesthesia without her permission.
The hospital has yet to provide any surveillance footage or records to explain what happened, she said.
Another employee at the clinic alleged that the veterinarians did not take the situation seriously when Micky went into shock, and only administered first aid after an intern pointed out that something was wrong, Ying said.
However, Chang cannot claim medical negligence, as pets are considered property under the law, Ying said.
The primary issue with the case should be whether the veterinarian had Chang sign a consent form, but consent forms are not covered in the Veterinarian Act (獸醫師法), Taipei Animal Protection Office Commissioner Chen Ying-hao (陳英豪) said, recommending that vets use sample forms provided by the office.
Taipei Consumer Protection Officer Kung Chien-ya (龔千雅) said her office received a complaint about the case earlier this month and is already conducting an investigation.
The hospital in a statement said that Wang had already apologized multiple times for the unintentional error caused by personal negligence.
It also vowed to take responsibility if administrative or legal errors are discovered on the part of the hospital or Wang.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of