China’s short notice that it is to implement a no-fly zone north of Taiwan from Sunday to Tuesday shows its disregard for international rules and poses a threat to regional flight security, experts said late on Wednesday.
Beijing informed Taiwan on Tuesday that it planned to implement a no-fly zone from 9am to 2pm from Sunday to Tuesday for the purposes of “conducting aerospace activities,” the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said.
The ministry said that the short notice given by Beijing, which was less than the standard seven days, flouted international norms and jeopardized flight safety in the area.
Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications
Amid protests from Taipei, Beijing announced it would reduce the duration to 27 minutes on Sunday, averting wider travel disruption, the ministry said.
The no-fly zone is to be enforced about 85 nautical miles (157km) off the north of Taiwan and within Taiwan’s Taipei Flight Information Region (FIR) and northern air defense identification zone (ADIZ), the military said.
South Korea and Japan, which China also briefed on its plans, said the no-fly zone is being implemented due to concerns over falling debris from a satellite launch.
Before setting up a no-fly zone, China should have issued a notice to air missions, or NOTAM, at least seven days before the set date, aviation safety specialist Peng Szu-ming (彭斯民) said.
While such no-fly zones are normally set up within a country’s territorial space, they sometimes overlap with other countries’ FIRs and ADIZs, said Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲), a research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research.
In such cases, the country in question is required to inform nearby authorities in a timely manner beforehand so that they can make preparations for aviation safety, Su said.
China’s announcement did not follow international rules and Beijing deliberately set up the no-fly zone in the Taipei FIR, one of the busiest flight routes in the area, he said, adding that its actions pose a serious threat to regional and international aviation safety.
Chinese authorities only told Taiwan of the no-fly zone on Tuesday, six days instead of the standard seven days, Deputy Minister of Transportation and Communications Chi Wen-jong (祁文中) said.
China’s behavior showed a disregard for international regulations and norms, Su said, adding that Beijing was using the no-fly zone to attain regional hegemony and assert its claims over Taiwan.
Peng said that despite agreeing to cut short the duration of the no-fly zone, China had already successfully demonstrated to the world its ability to disrupt and block air traffic northeast of Taiwan.
Speaking to Bloomberg, Sung Wen-ti (宋文笛), a specialist on Taiwanese politics and cross-strait relations at Australian National University, said it was unusual that Beijing changed its plan following a complaint from Taiwan.
The change might be a sign of coordination problems within Beijing, he said.
“The aviation agency may have called for a more extended no-fly zone period out of technical necessity, but economic and foreign affairs portfolios subsequently scaled it back to minimize regional pushback,” he said.
The original schedule would have overlapped with the G7 foreign ministers’ meeting in Karuizawa, Japan, that is to be held from Sunday to Tuesday.
China has reserved offshore airspace in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea from March 27 to May 6, issuing alerts usually used to warn of military exercises, although no such exercises have been announced, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported yesterday. Reserving such a large area for 40 days without explanation is an “unusual step,” as military exercises normally only last a few days, the paper said. These alerts, known as Notice to Air Missions (Notams), “are intended to inform pilots and aviation authorities of temporary airspace hazards or restrictions,” the article said. The airspace reserved in the alert is
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS
More than 6,000 Taiwanese students have participated in exchange programs in China over the past two years, despite the Mainland Affairs Council’s (MAC) “orange light” travel advisory, government records showed. The MAC’s publicly available registry showed that Taiwanese college and university students who went on exchange programs across the Strait numbered 3,592 and 2,966 people respectively. The National Immigration Agency data revealed that 2,296 and 2,551 Chinese students visited Taiwan for study in the same two years. A review of the Web sites of publicly-run universities and colleges showed that Taiwanese higher education institutions continued to recruit students for Chinese educational programs without
RSS