The government intends to regulate online speech by introducing a draft digital intermediary services act, the New Power Party (NPP) caucus told a news conference in Taipei yesterday.
Although issues of Internet governance are nothing new, the question is how such laws should be designed and enforced to curb cybercrime and other problems while preventing the government censoring online speech in the name of fighting disinformation and crime, NPP caucus whip Chiu Hsien-chih (邱顯智) said.
If laws related to Internet governance are not stipulated carefully, freedom to criticize the government would be lost, which could be the death knell for freedom and democracy, Chiu said.
Photo: Liang Cheng-hui, Taipei Times
In 2013, before she became president, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), the Democratic Progressive Party’s chairperson, opposed the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s proposed amendment to Article 9 of the now-defunct telecommunications act, declaring that “diverse and innovative online platforms would lose their power to enliven society if administrative authorities use unclear laws to restrict people’s activities on the Internet,” he said.
“Has President Tsai forgotten what she said in 2013? Has she changed her mind since she took on the top job?” Chiu asked.
Based on the draft digital act, online platform operators must place an alert next to a message if administrative agencies consider it to be unsubstantiated or illegal, Chiu said.
If a court agrees that an information restraining order should be issued, it must do so within 48 hours of receiving a request from a government agency, Chiu said, adding that the rules would allow administrative agencies to arbitrarily restrict online activity.
The National Communications Commission (NCC) told the public that it had consulted similar regulations in the EU and UK when drafting the bill, but the EU’s Digital Services Act requires platform operators to enhance users’ ability to discern the credibility and quality of information they consume, rather than putting alerts next to content at the request of government agencies, Chiu said.
The UK’s draft online safety bill does not require courts to rule within 48 hours whether online content should be taken down, he said, adding that the conditions under which an information restraining order can be requested are clearer and stricter than the ones stipulated by the NCC.
The NCC should draft a feasible act that would not infringe on freedom of speech by adopting a bottom-up approach, while communicating with platform operators and civil groups, he said.
“Instead, the commission adopted a top-down approach, which generates concerns for impeding speech and is not consistent with legislation in other countries,” Chiu said. “People have reason to believe that the government is extending its tentacles into the Internet.”
NPP Legislator Claire Wang (王婉諭) said that the draft act would have little to no effect on platform operators if they do not have offices in Taiwan.
The NCC should not work behind closed doors, nor should it formulate unrealistic and unenforceable regulations, Wang said.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS