The government should offer relief funds to school lunch caterers, whose businesses were disrupted by the Ministry of Education’s policy authorizing schools to switch to virtual classrooms amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Kuo-shu (黃國書) said yesterday.
Last year, in-person classes were canceled nationwide after the government raised the COVID-19 alert to level 3, and the government subsidized school lunch caterers for financial losses sustained from food they had bought before the schools were closed, Huang said, adding that they were compensated for lost revenue and salaries as well.
The financial losses that caterers have sustained this year, which they suffered through no fault of their own, was no less than that of last year, he told a news conference in Taipei, adding that the government should keep them in mind when it distributes relief funds.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
While schools are supposed to compensate caterers for their losses based on the procurement contracts, they generally do not have such funding, he said.
Chen Ming -hsin (陳明信), chairman of a business association for boxed meal operators, said they should be compensated based on their contracts with schools, and a mechanism should be established to settle future disputes.
“As school lunch caterers, we must obtain special permission from schools to offer services and maintain high hygiene standards,” he said. “Last year, we experienced the longest summer vacation of three-and-a-half months. This year, our collective business losses in April and May are expected to exceed NT$400 million [US$13.6 million].”
School lunch caterers serve meals to 1.71 million pupils across the country daily, Chen said, adding that 10 large school lunch caterers have had to close down over the past two years because of inflation and the pandemic.
The government should offer them financial assistance, he said.
“This year, the situation was even more chaotic, because local governments were authorized to decide on their own if school should be closed,” Chen said. “We were often notified on Friday or even on Sunday that schools would switch to virtual classrooms on Monday, but we need to purchase ingredients at least three days in advance and begin marinating meat ahead of time. If schools were closed, we would have to donate the purchased food ingredients to charity groups or throw them away when they rot.”
School lunch caterers should not be asked to bear the losses alone, Chen said, adding that net margins are already low at 3 to 5 percent.
Many of their employees are women returning from a career gap, and they might find other jobs if school lunches were canceled for more than two months, he said.
Chen Hsi-hung (陳錫鴻), deputy director of student affairs and school security division at the ministry’s K-12 Administration, said that schools and school lunch caterers have contracts which stipulate that schools should compensate caterers for all additional costs incurred if they are not liable for the increase in costs.
Schools can also extend their contracts with caterers, he said, adding that the ministry will help schools fulfill the terms of the contracts.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods