Animal rights advocates yesterday staged a sit-in in front of the Forestry Bureau to protest a hearing on allowing special interest groups, including indigenous people, to hunt wildlife.
Protesters read out statements and shouted slogans such as “We oppose the bureau opening up for illegal hunting,” “Stop killing endangered wildlife” and “Animals cannot speak up for themselves, so we have to speak for them.”
Wildlife are living creatures and resources belonging to all citizens, not meat to be eaten by special interest groups, said Chu Tseng-hung (朱增宏), an executive at the Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan.
Photo: CNA
Also present were members from the Taiwan Animal Equality Association, the Taiwan Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the mLife Conservationist Association, the Animal Protection Association of ROC and the Taiwan Dog Lovers’ Association, the groups’ news release said.
Chu said they are opposed to the bureau, as an agency under Council of Agriculture, opening a backdoor for certain sectors to enter protected forests and other preserved areas to illegally hunt wildlife.
“Hunting is not conservation. We are totally against permitting illegal hunting, which the bureau is proposing to do through a ‘self-management policy,’” Chu said.
The groups held the protest as a hearing about proposed wildlife hunting regulations for indigenous communities went on inside the bureau.
The animal rights advocates entered the venue after a brief sit-in, and some members charged the podium to voice their objections, temporarily interrupting the proceedings.
In their news release, the groups said there is a need to protect animals from cruelty, such as steel-jaw traps.
If conservation programs are not enforced, all of Taiwan’s protected wildlife species would become extinct, the groups said.
“Under current law, there is no legal way for anyone in the nation to hunt wildlife. The only exceptions are cases in which a person is attacked by an animal and must protect their own life, and instances of animals causing serious damage to agricultural production,” the groups said, citing examples of farmers repelling Formosan macaques.
The groups said these laws are enforced in all locations, even on private land, as they are meant to protect wildlife.
Meanwhile, the bureau and indigenous groups cited Constitutional Interpretation No. 803 issued by the Council of Grand Justices last year, which stressed respect for traditional practices and cultures.
The interpretation stated that protected wildlife species should not be among the animals indigenous groups hunt unless there are special circumstances, the indigenous groups said.
“The court permitted hunting of animals only for traditional rituals and for ‘own use,’ but this is not clearly defined,” they said.
Animal rights advocates said that these gray areas are prone to abuse, and urged government agencies to issue clear regulations on what hunting tools can be used, what “own use” means, and whether the meat can be consumed by family members and people within the community.
The advocates demanded that bureau officials assess the situation and collect data on how many animals people are permitted to hunt, as well as other details such as which species, and share it with the public.
“How will the indigenous communities enforce ‘self-management’ ... and what oversight mechanism will be set up to monitor the process?” they asked.
Considering that most countries issue more than five denominations of banknotes, the central bank has decided to redesign all five denominations, the bank said as it prepares for the first major overhaul of the banknotes in more than 24 years. Central bank Governor Yang Chin-lung (楊金龍) is expected to report to the Legislative Yuan today on the bank’s operations and the redesign’s progress. The bank in a report sent to the legislature ahead of today’s meeting said it had commissioned a survey on the public’s preferences. Survey results showed that NT$100 and NT$1,000 banknotes are the most commonly used, while NT$200 and NT$2,000
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) yesterday reported the first case of a new COVID-19 subvariant — BA.3.2 — in a 10-year-old Singaporean girl who had a fever upon arrival in Taiwan and tested positive for the disease. The girl left Taiwan on March 20 and the case did not have a direct impact on the local community, it said. The WHO added the BA.3.2 strain to its list of Variants Under Monitoring in December last year, but this was the first imported case of the COVID-19 variant in Taiwan, CDC Deputy Director-General Lin Ming-cheng (林明誠) said. The girl arrived in Taiwan on
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is suspending retaliation measures against South Korea that were set to take effect tomorrow, after Seoul said it is updating its e-arrival system, MOFA said today. The measures were to be a new round of retaliation after Taiwan on March 1 changed South Korea's designation on government-issued alien resident certificates held by South Korean nationals to "South Korea” from the "Republic of Korea," the country’s official name. The move came after months of protests to Seoul over its listing of Taiwan as "China (Taiwan)" in dropdown menus on its new online immigration entry system. MOFA last week