The National Sports Training Center would refrain from using US pork as an ingredient in meals served to athletes, as ractopamine is listed by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a banned substance, Sports Administration Director-General Chang Shao-hsi (張少熙) has said.
The center serves as the training base for the nation’s top athletes scheduled to compete in the Tokyo Olympic Games next year.
Chang said in an interview with the Central News Agency that allowing the importation of US pork containing ractopamine is a national policy, but athletes are a special group of people.
Photo: CNA
“We would make sure that the athletes need not have to worry about whether what they eat in the center could get them in trouble. My job is to make sure that all the cattle in the bullpen are well taken care of,” Chang said during the interview.
The center would also conduct daily, weekly and monthly inspections of the food served at the center, so that the athletes can be assured of the safety of the food they consume, Chang said.
The center would also reinforce athletes’ education on how they should eat when they are not in the center, he added.
“The center would protect them from consuming pork containing ractopamine residue, but it would not be able to protect them when they are outside, where they could consume meatballs and steamed buns with pork from questionable sources,” he said.
The center can only ask the athletes to be responsible for what they eat and that they should ascertain the source of the food before they consume it, Chang added.
During a visit to the center last week, he instructed the center to recruit experts to identify meat products containing ractopamine residue and determine how long the residue can remain in the human body, Chang said.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of