A group of legal reform advocates yesterday pushed for a jury — instead of a lay judge — system in the nation’s quest for judicial reform, saying it would make for more democratic and impartial rulings.
“Top Judicial Yuan officials have been telling the public that Taiwanese do not understand what a jury system is, using it as an excuse to oppose its implementation. I am riled up by such talk, which is disparaging and discriminates against our own people,” Taiwan Jury Association founder Jerry Cheng (鄭文龍) told a news conference in Taipei.
“Our party supports a jury system, as public satisfaction with court rulings on many criminal cases is very low,” New Power Party Legislator Chen Jiau-hua (陳椒華) said. “There are also problems with political interference and ‘dinosaur judges’ who make rulings contrary to society’s expectations.”
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
“We believe a jury system can better serve and protect the public,” Chen added.
More than 80 to 90 percent of people do not trust court judges, so the Legislative Yuan must do more to restore public trust in the justice system, Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Tsai Pi-ju (蔡壁如) said, adding that during her stint at the Taipei City Government, a simulation court with a jury system was put in place, which produced very good results, to the satisfaction of the people involved.
Many Taiwanese who have emigrated to North America and hold dual citizenship have served as jury members in the US or Canada, Cheng said, putting the figure at between 500,000 and 1 million.
He estimated that one in 23 of these Taiwanese have already served, or are qualified to serve as jury members.
Besides, most Taiwanese have the competency, social experience and comprehension to make a jury system work if it is implemented, he said.
One such Taiwanese who had lived in US is Kuo Chung-kuo (郭重國), who was invited to the news conference to discuss his experience.
“US statistics showed that 95 percent of decisions made by juries were correct... It is not easy for 12 people to totally agree on one matter, but juries were able to make correct decisions, which proved to be right most of the time,” he said.
The US has used a jury system for criminal prosecution for more than 200 years, he said.
“In the early days when the US was just opening up its western region, there was no questioning if the public lacked the comprehension or understanding of issues to serve on the jury,” he said.
“There is no perfect system for law and justice, but a jury system is on the right path toward a real democratic and impartial process,” he added.
Cheng and other legal reform advocates have blasted the Judicial Yuan and the Democratic Progressive Party for promoting a bill for a lay judge system, which Japan, for one, uses.
That could become law after a third reading and legislative vote later this year.
The Judicial Yuan’s version only permits citizens to serve as lay judges and work alongside professional judges in criminal trials, but the real authority and decisionmaking power would still held by professional judges, Cheng said.
It is a “fake judicial reform” as the lay judge system does not allow citizens to really participate in the judicial process, and it is a hidden way for the Judicial Yuan to block the jury system, he added.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS