The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a duty to establish official communications between Taiwan and China, former National Security Council (NSC) secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起) said on Sunday.
Su told an academic seminar that the DPP and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hold diametrically opposing views about the so-called “1992 consensus,” which Beijing considers to be the political foundation for official exchanges between Taiwan and China and has cited as a reason for breaking off exchanges with the DPP government.
The “1992 consensus” — a term Su admitted in 2006 to making up in 2000 when he was head of the Mainland Affairs Council — refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and Chinese government that both sides acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
The DPP denies its existence, although it acknowledges there were talks that year between the two governments and both sides did reach some agreements, none of which include an agreement by Taiwan that it is part of China.
By saying no to such a critical foundation for exchange, Su said that the DPP will never be able to talk to China and must explain to Taiwanese why it is unable to do so.
The KMT’s position on the “1992 consensus” is “yes, but” — yes, there is only one China, but each side retains the right to interpret what “one China” means, Su said.
Beijing says that since there is no written agreement between the two on the meaning of “one China” or leeway to interpret its meaning, it focuses on the “one China” part, Su added.
The KMT, which was the ruling party at the time, understands that the consensus is an agreement on “one China” and a “tacit understanding” that Taiwan can interpret that one China to be the Republic of China (ROC), he said.
To clarify confusion over the results of the 1992 talks in Hong Kong, Su said he later came up with the term “1992 consensus” to refer to a “one China” agreement, even though he knows that most nations recognize the People’s Republic of China as China, not the ROC or Taiwan.
Su said he believes that if the DPP simply recognizes the murkiness of the”one China” concept in the “1992 consensus” by accepting the existence of the consensus while maintaining its disagreement with the “one China” part, then that would probably satisfy everyone.
This is similar to the KMT’s “yes, but” stance, he added.
He never expected that the CCP would come to embrace the “1992 consensus” while the DPP would not, Su said, adding that no matter what, it is up to the DPP as the ruling party to try to establish communications with China.
“That is the DPP government’s duty,” he said.
Fellow former NSC secretary-general Chen Chung-hsin (陳忠信) said that the political implications of “one China” places Taiwan at a great disadvantage.
Taiwan has not asked China: “What is Taiwan in your ‘one China’ principle?” the former DPP lawmaker and official said.
“This is a key question to which all Taiwanese should seek an answer and on which they had better reach a consensus,” he added.
Based on this argument, Chen said that he does not accept Su’s assertion that it is the DPP’s duty to build a bridge of communication with China.
SHIPS, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES: The ministry has announced changes to varied transportation industries taking effect soon, with a number of effects for passengers Beginning next month, the post office is canceling signature upon delivery and written inquiry services for international registered small packets in accordance with the new policy of the Universal Postal Union, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said yesterday. The new policy does not apply to packets that are to be delivered to China, the ministry said. Senders of international registered small packets would receive a NT$10 rebate on postage if the packets are sent from Jan. 1 to March 31, it added. The ministry said that three other policies are also scheduled to take effect next month. International cruise ship operators
NUMBERS IMBALANCE: More than 4 million Taiwanese have visited China this year, while only about half a million Chinese have visited here Beijing has yet to respond to Taiwan’s requests for negotiation over matters related to the recovery of cross-strait tourism, the Tourism Administration said yesterday. Taiwan’s tourism authority issued the statement after Chinese-language daily the China Times reported yesterday that the government’s policy of banning group tours to China does not stop Taiwanese from visiting the country. As of October, more than 4.2 million had traveled to China this year, exceeding last year. Beijing estimated the number of Taiwanese tourists in China could reach 4.5 million this year. By contrast, only 500,000 Chinese tourists are expected in Taiwan, the report said. The report
The Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency yesterday launched a gift box to market honey “certified by a Formosan black bear” in appreciation of a beekeeper’s amicable interaction with a honey-thieving bear. Beekeeper Chih Ming-chen (池明鎮) in January inspected his bee farm in Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪) and found that more than 20 beehives had been destroyed and many hives were eaten, with bear droppings and paw prints near the destroyed hives, the agency said. Chih returned to the farm to move the remaining beehives away that evening when he encountered a Formosan black bear only 20m away, the agency said. The bear
Chinese embassy staffers attempted to interrupt an award ceremony of an international tea competition in France when the organizer introduced Taiwan and displayed the Republic of China flag, a Taiwanese tea farmer said in an interview published today. Hsieh Chung-lin (謝忠霖), chief executive of Juxin Tea Factory from Taichung's Lishan (梨山) area, on Dec. 2 attended the Teas of the World International Contest held at the Peruvian embassy in Paris. Hsieh was awarded a special prize for his Huagang Snow Source Tea by the nonprofit Agency for the Valorization of Agricultural Products (AVPA). During the ceremony, two Chinese embassy staffers in attendance
RSS