Mon, Jun 05, 2017 page3

• INTERVIEW: Moving the National Palace Museum in new directions

  In an interview with reporters from the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times), National Palace Museum Director Lin Jeng-yi discussed how the museum hopes to become more integrated with Taiwanese society, achieve more professional management and maintain its international prestige

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Liberty Times (LT): From your experience, is the National Palace Museum tradition-heavy and resistant to change as an institution?

  Lin Jeng-yi (林正儀): The museum is in a unique situation where it has ingrained traditions, but also a plethora of different views generated by its staff or other individuals. The museum often finds it impossible to implement policies through direct administrative orders.

  The museum’s management has to find ways to convey how such policies have come to be, in a positive manner, to these staffers. We also have to, if possible, endeavor to avoid sensitive issues such as political ideologies.

  

  National Palace Museum Director Lin Jeng-yi speaks at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Education and Culture Committee in Taipei on May 10.

  Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times

  Due to such difficulties, personnel costs and day-to-day administrative work account for 80 percent of the museum’s annual budget.

  Despite such difficulties, we have produced our own polices. Take, for example, the policy to promote Taiwan through the National Palace Museum. It provides clear instructions that the museum should endeavor to break out of its formerly cloistered administrative functions and connect with the local culture.

  The policy led to the idea of making the museum more modern and more approachable for the public. We need to consider how the museum is to connect with local culture and society, and how to share the values that have heretofore been limited within the museum with the public.

  LT: Is “making the museum more public” a concept, or an actual policy?

  Lin: The concept of making the museum more public, managed by professionals and increased public participation revolves around organizational reform.

  The museum is going to have to deliver a four-year plan for changes in organizing its personnel based on exhibit contents, how the public will be involved in such decisions and how the museum will cooperate with outside sources.

  I hope the museum will eventually connect with other Taiwanese museums in terms of research results or techniques to repair items. We are also seeking to come up with ways to motivate the public to visit the museum so that it would be better accepted and understood by Taiwanese society.

  LT: You have mentioned the project to promote Taiwan through the museum. Is there a plan behind the project, or is it just an idea?

  Lin: We have, over the past year, been coming up with plans to help implement the project. To achieve this goal, the museum’s international exchange office will have to increase its efforts to promote the museum, or alternatively, the museum will to have to launch exhibition tours or exchange artworks with international museums through a four-year program.

  The museum has to date largely leaned on China-centric thoughts, in both political ideology and arts development. The museum should endeavor to explore the possibility of expressing the exhibition of art in a more local manner, or in the vein of Eastern-style art and culture.

  Through such endeavors, we hope to encourage our citizens and foreigners to re-discover art and culture through the lens of pan-Asia or pan-Taiwan, instead of a China-centric view.

  Should it become possible to consider the culture and art of the East by identifying oneself as Taiwanese, then we have subjectivity of research, through which we could offer difference of interpretations, which will then facilitate the West’s recognition of our culture and art.

  Therefore, it is important for us to have subjectivity in our research methodology so we could offer our interpretation of the museum’s collection.

  As there are no precedents in Taiwan, the museum should gradually establish such systems and incorporate academic methodology and results. Perhaps, these different research projects will allow people to understand the depth of Taiwanese culture.

  To offer a more dynamic portrayal, and seeing things from different subjective views, is a great challenge for traditional methodology of research and preservation techniques practiced by the museum.

  Only through a more open manner can we promote Taiwan through the National Palace Museum.

  LT: What is the museum’s vision for the future following the four-year plan?

  Lin: The museum aims to become a legal person, thereby attaining the goal of being managed by professionals. It also hopes to attract foreign professionals to maintain the museum’s competitiveness and prestige as a world-class museum.

  Making the museum into a foundation is an issue that involves the nation, and all other national museums. This is an established consensus within the Executive Yuan, and in the future, all museums under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Culture will be incorporated under one single foundation.

  We are considering emulating how the Smithsonian Institution is run — its operations are overseen by a Board of Regents, including the vice president of the United States, as well as 16 other individuals.

  The Smithsonian Institution openly recruits its directors for each branch according to what is needed, and the candidates are not limited to US citizens either.

  Should such an institution be established in Taiwan and a similar board set up, the National Palace Museum would only be one museum among many, and the director of which, if needed, could be a foreigner.

  Perhaps it would become possible for the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art to be the director of the National Palace Museum as well.

  As foundations could legally raise funds, it would become possible to offer high pay and hire professional directors that seek the best interests of the museum.

  Therefore, the museum should be opened to the public so it could be better managed; as for organizational reform, the museum should look into which foreign museum has a better method of operation.

  LT: Can you give a brief description of what you think of the National Palace Museum?

  Lin: The museum should be removed from political intervention and should become a more professional museum. It should be allowed more flexible international interaction with other museums to accrue more renown and international competitiveness.

  Change is a necessary path that must be taken.

  It is not easy to change the traditions of a museum with a long history, and there must be consensus within for change to happen. We have spent the past year trying to convey our thoughts on the changes, and while they did not like to hear of such talk, they have gradually come around and are beginning to accept it.

  Translated by staff writer Jake Chung
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Podul intensifies as it approaches: CWA

  • 2

    Taipei interested in restoring ties with Honduras: ministry

  • 3

    Sinner, Sabalenka reach Cincinnati quarter-finals

  • 4

    Public debate held ahead of nuclear referendum

  • 5

    Lai urges people to vote ‘no’ in nuclear energy referendum