The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday said it was negotiating with the UN following a report that a Taiwanese tourist was denied entry to the UN headquarters in Europe after presenting her Republic of China (ROC) passport.
Tsai Yu-ling (蔡淯鈴) said in a Facebook post that on a recent trip to Geneva, Switzerland, she wanted to join a daily guided tour at the UN headquarters, but when she showed her ROC passport at the entrance, she was told she could not use it to enter the facility.
Tsai said she told the staff member that she had used her ROC passport to visit the UN headquarters a few years ago and asked why she could not do so now. The man replied that regulations had changed and she could not enter the building with an ROC passport.
Tsai said the man then asked another staff member to explain the changes to her.
“Taiwan is part of China,” Tsai quoted the person as saying. “Can you please present your Chinese passport and a Chinese ID card? You can enter and visit the headquarters as long as you can show us either one of those documents.”
“I am Taiwanese and I only have a Taiwanese passport. Taiwan is not part of China,” Tsai answered, adding that since she is not a Chinese citizen, it would be impossible for her to own a Chinese passport or a Chinese ID.
She added that she told the staff member that what they were asking her to produce does not exist and that it was a form of discrimination.
Tsai said the person reiterated that she could go in if she could show them a Chinese passport, but could not enter without one.
Tsai said that she eventually left the UN headquarters, feeling angry and humiliated.
According to the ministry, Tsai was not the only person who had been denied a tour around the UN headquarters. A Taiwanese man encountered the same problem when he wanted to enter the building using his ROC passport.
Michael Hsu (徐佩勇), director-general of the ministry’s Department of International Organizations, said the government cannot accept how the UN handled the situation, adding that the ministry had asked the Geneva office of the Cultural and Economic Delegation of Taipei to negotiate with the staff of the UN.
Hsu said the UN has not been consistent in the way it handled the situation, sometimes allowing Taiwanese to enter the building if they present two photo IDs, but denying them entry at other times even if they followed the requirement.
Hsu said it is a long-term issue and is a problem that had occurred not only under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, but also during the Democratic Progressive Party administration.
He said the government would continue to negotiate with the UN over the issue as long as Taiwanese tourists report such discriminatory practices.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS