The Consumers’ Foundation says the nation’s food monitoring has descended into anarchy, citing Top Pot Bakery’s false advertising and Chyuan Shun Food Enterprise Co’s false labeling, as examples of the trend.
After the shock of Top Pot Bakery’s scandal over using artificial flavorings while touting its “all-natural” products, yet another example surfaced with a rice brand, famous for its self-claimed locally grown rice and taking the third-largest market share, found to have its domestically grown rice mixed with cheaper imported rice.
Both the bakery and the food firm have been punished by fines in accordance with the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) and the Food Administration Act (糧食管理法), respectively.
However, the NT$180,000 fine levied on the bakery and the NT$200,000 fine on the packaged rice manufacturer are insignificant to the companies enjoying annual revenues exceeding NT$600 million (US$ 20 million) and NT$1 billion, the foundation said.
The foundation on Friday questioned the inapplicability of the Fair Trade Act (公平交易法) in both cases, which would impose a maximum penalty of NT$25 million, 125 times more than the NT$200,000 fine for false advertising.
The punishments indicate the government is giving the two food acts higher priority than the Fair Trade Act, but there is no reason to do so, said the group, adding the punishment imposed by the food safety acts are so light that they fail to constitute an effective deterrent to misconduct by companies packaging the nation’s food.
“The Act Governing Food Sanitation and the Fair Trade Act can both be applied in the bakery’s case of false advertising. It is simply an issue of overlapping laws,” Foundation’s Consumer Reports Magazine publisher Chen Chih-yi (陳智義) said.
The group said the rice enterprise has been mislabeling Taiwanese rice as Vietnamese rice and that there is no provision of the Food Administration Act governing the counterfeiting problem.
Rather, the group says that it is the Act Governing Food Sanitation, with a provision on counterfeited or adulterated food products, that should be applied in the rice enterprise’s case.
The act states that those committing the counterfeiting or adulterating will be fined between NT$60,000 and NT$15 million and “in severe circumstances, the enterprise may be ordered to terminate business, suspend business for a certain period of time, or lose the company registration.”
According to the Agriculture and Food Agency, the rice company has been caught with false labeling and other violations 18 other times in two years.
Taiwanese can file complaints with the Tourism Administration to report travel agencies if their activities caused termination of a person’s citizenship, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday, after a podcaster highlighted a case in which a person’s citizenship was canceled for receiving a single-use Chinese passport to enter Russia. The council is aware of incidents in which people who signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of Russia were told they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, Chiu told reporters on the sidelines of an event in Taipei. However, the travel agencies actually applied
Japanese footwear brand Onitsuka Tiger today issued a public apology and said it has suspended an employee amid allegations that the staff member discriminated against a Vietnamese customer at its Taipei 101 store. Posting on the social media platform Threads yesterday, a user said that an employee at the store said that “those shoes are very expensive” when her friend, who is a migrant worker from Vietnam, asked for assistance. The employee then ignored her until she asked again, to which she replied: "We don't have a size 37." The post had amassed nearly 26,000 likes and 916 comments as of this
New measures aimed at making Taiwan more attractive to foreign professionals came into effect this month, the National Development Council said yesterday. Among the changes, international students at Taiwanese universities would be able to work in Taiwan without a work permit in the two years after they graduate, explainer materials provided by the council said. In addition, foreign nationals who graduated from one of the world’s top 200 universities within the past five years can also apply for a two-year open work permit. Previously, those graduates would have needed to apply for a work permit using point-based criteria or have a Taiwanese company
The Shilin District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday indicted two Taiwanese and issued a wanted notice for Pete Liu (劉作虎), founder of Shenzhen-based smartphone manufacturer OnePlus Technology Co (萬普拉斯科技), for allegedly contravening the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) by poaching 70 engineers in Taiwan. Liu allegedly traveled to Taiwan at the end of 2014 and met with a Taiwanese man surnamed Lin (林) to discuss establishing a mobile software research and development (R&D) team in Taiwan, prosecutors said. Without approval from the government, Lin, following Liu’s instructions, recruited more than 70 software