Taipei Times (TT): Taiwan always says China misunderstands its efforts to deepen democracy as steps toward independence, such as the referendum and the constitutional reform. Do you perceive any independence intentions in these democratic steps?
Shelley Rigger: There are individuals and groups of individuals within Taiwan who have the long-term ambition of achieving formal and complete independence. Some of them do imagine some of these steps can move Taiwan in that direction.
There is the possibility that for some individuals, [independence] is the intention behind changes like the referendum. But I do not agree that this is President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) or the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) intention.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
I don't think President Chen has a timetable for independence that begins with passing the referendum law and [ends with] implementing the constitution in 2008 to achieve independence.
TT: Beijing says it will not hear what Chen Shui-bian says but will only see what he does. China's leaders said they are willing to sacrifice the 2008 Olympic Games to crush independence movements in Taiwan if necessary. How should President Chen react to such statements?
Rigger: We want to take the Taiwanese leadership at its word. If you say this is what you are doing, then we accept that's what you are doing. It's not healthy and it doesn't get us anywhere to constantly be questioning, doubting and probing. We have to believe in each other; otherwise we are getting nowhere.
But likewise, we have to accept what the People's Republic of China [PRC] says to some extent as being what's really in their heart. If we compare their statements in objective measurement of their interest, it is easy to believe what they say.
What they say is: `We don't need to push unification. But we must prevent independence.' What they are preparing to sacrifice everything for is to stop the move toward independence.
President Chen has a lot of room for taking actions that convey the message that he is not trying to push for the way.
TT: From Beijing's statements on May 17 and 24, it is clear China still has a lot of doubts and concerns about Taiwan moving towards independence. What may Taipei do to remove the suspicion?
Rigger: Part of the problem is, of course, the PRC always imagines the worst. Maybe that's a strategic necessity for them.
They always plan for the worst possible case. They assume constitutional reform will be Taiwanese independence.
The way constitutional reform was initiated and discussed at the beginning of the political campaign really gave them more reason to make this argument. I don't think the Americans would have been inclined to accept their logic except that there was some reason to do so.
[President Chen] made a big announcement on Sept. 28 talking about a new constitution. That really gave the PRC a lot of ammunition to use. They said only new countries get new constitutions. New countries use a new constitution to reconstitute their country.
If President Chen had talked about constitutional reform or revision or amendment, it would not have attracted the level of concern that it did.
The fact he is now back to the constitutional reform, revision and amendment in his inauguration speech, in a way, took a big circle to get back to where we started. That process of going around damaged US-Taiwan relations. It also damaged US-PRC relations.
There may be something in the logic that [taking the circle] was necessary and valuable.
But I am not smart enough to see that. I see that damage was done and I don't know how it moves us forward.
Taiwan could pursue constitutional revision through the painful process outlining the existing constitution. I have been talking to some people in the blue camp recently, and they agree the electoral system needs to be reformed. They understand the balance of power between the president and the legislature is unfixed.
TT: You said the "one country, two systems" formulation is dead in Taiwan. Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum CSIS (a Honolulu-based research institute affiliated with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington), suggested that China invent a more creative and flexible principle to apply to cross-strait relations, such as "one country, two states" or "one country, two governments" model. What do you make of the idea?
Rigger: If that is something the PRC could accept, that would be hard for many Taiwanese to swallow. But it might be possible because Taiwan could get a lot of benefit from putting this conflict behind it.
The "peace rising" in China is inevitably closing in on Taiwan. There will increasingly be a desire in Taiwan to make the situation better. If you could get the PRC to talk about something like the "one country, two states," even though a lot of Taiwanese don't want to think of themselves as Chinese, they might go for it anyway if they are pragmatic enough.
‘DENIAL DEFENSE’: The US would increase its military presence with uncrewed ships, and submarines, while boosting defense in the Indo-Pacific, a Pete Hegseth memo said The US is reorienting its military strategy to focus primarily on deterring a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a memo signed by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed. The memo also called on Taiwan to increase its defense spending. The document, known as the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance,” was distributed this month and detailed the national defense plans of US President Donald Trump’s administration, an article in the Washington Post said on Saturday. It outlines how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama
A magnitude 4.9 earthquake struck off Tainan at 11:47am today, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said. The hypocenter was 32.3km northeast of Tainan City Hall at a depth of 7.3km, CWA data showed. The intensity of the quake, which gauges the actual effect of a seismic event, measured 4 in Tainan and Chiayi County on Taiwan's seven-tier intensity scale, the data showed. The quake had an intensity of 3 in Chiayi City and County, and Yunlin County, while it was measured as 2 in Kaohsiung, Nantou County, Changhua County, Taitung County and offshore Penghu County, the data showed. There were no immediate reports of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is maintaining close ties with Beijing, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday, hours after a new round of Chinese military drills in the Taiwan Strait began. Political parties in a democracy have a responsibility to be loyal to the nation and defend its sovereignty, DPP spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) told a news conference in Taipei. His comments came hours after Beijing announced via Chinese state media that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command was holding large-scale drills simulating a multi-pronged attack on Taiwan. Contrary to the KMT’s claims that it is staunchly anti-communist, KMT Deputy
RESPONSE: The government would investigate incidents of Taiwanese entertainers in China promoting CCP propaganda online in contravention of the law, the source said Taiwanese entertainers living in China who are found to have contravened cross-strait regulations or collaborated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could be subject to fines, a source said on Sunday. Several Taiwanese entertainers have posted on the social media platform Sina Weibo saying that Taiwan “must be returned” to China, and sharing news articles from Chinese state media. In response, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has asked the Ministry of Culture to investigate whether the entertainers had contravened any laws, and asked for them to be questioned upon their return to Taiwan, an official familiar with the matter said. To curb repeated
RSS