Chen Shui-bian (
Lien Chan (連戰): The Council of Aboriginal Affairs was established during KMT rule, and during my run for the presidency in 2000, I also pledged to establish a Council for Hakka Affairs. Although I failed in my presidential bid, the KMT still pushed for the establishment of the Council for Hakka Affairs as well as other related matters in the legislature. In other words, what the DPP harvested today from its administrative record resulted from seeds that were first sowed by the KMT during our time in office. Except for Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭), the chairwoman of the Council for Hakka Affairs, virtually no other Hakka serve as mem-bers of the Cabinet in this DPP administration.
In addition, the Examination Yuan's use of the Hoklo language [also known as Taiwanese] in national examinations, which could only be understood by those fluent in Taiwanese, demonstrated a lack of respect for other ethnic groups.
Lien: The premise of the "defensive referendum" that you have proposed is that the country's sovereignty is threatened with being changed. What makes you so sure that Taiwan's sovereignty faces such a threat?
Chen: I wish Mr. Lien would read the clause in Article 17 of the Referendum Law, which says, "When there is cause for concern [Chen's emphasis] over the country's sovereignty." It does not say that Taiwan's sovereignty has to have already changed. Taiwan faces a threat posed by 496 Chinese ballistic missiles. China is hardening its "one China" stance even as it continues to proclaim that it won't renounce the use of force against Taiwan. It wants Taiwan to accept "one country, two systems" to turn us into another Hong Kong. The people of Taiwan cannot accept this. Surely we can't wait until they attack us? By then it will be too late. I'm sure Mr. Lien wouldn't accept this either.
The peace referendum will preserve Taiwan's economic wealth, its peace and stability and its democratic reforms. World leaders will watch from afar. I called Taiwan's first referendum in order to enable the people to understand that we must not turn our enemy into our motherland and we must have no illusions about China. Only by doing this will we be able to strengthen the resolve of the people. Referendums are a popular trend, and are the right choice for Taiwan to protect itself. Please, Mr. Lien, do not obstruct this.
Chen: Could you clearly state your position on whether you are willing to pass a law governing political donations by the end of this month to resolve the controversy over donations? Will you also agree to reduce the number of seats in the legislature by half?
Lien: The version which the DPP wants to pass stipulates that political donations can be accepted during the period of the election campaign, but that at other times, such actions require monitoring. The DPP's version of the bill is apparently an attempt to deceive people, because it means that outside the campaign period, they can take on any number of political donations without any regulation.
The KMT-People First Party (PFP) alliance maintains that political donations should be regulated at all times, regardless of whether it is election time or not.
On the issue of reducing seats in the legislature, it was the KMT who negotiated to cut the number of legislators to 225 when the DPP insisted on having 250. Put simply, cutting the number of legislative seats has always been the platform of the KMT.
Lien: Mr. Chen's administration has been unsuccessful in realizing his promise of bringing about direct links. But when I proposed a timetable facilitating direct links within one year, you suggested that I was being manipulated by China. I want to ask Mr. Chen: Do you have any concrete evidence to prove your accusation?
Chen: A man wanted on suspicion of financial crimes, Chang Yang (張揚), had established a Lien-Soong support organization in Shanghai publicly campaigning for Lien Chan and his running mate James Soong (宋楚瑜) in China. Could he have done so without the support of the Chinese government?
Mr. Lien also talks of wanting to complete steps toward commen-cing direct flights within one or two years, but that issue depends on the question of whether you would accept the "one China" policy if China required you to do so.
Four years ago, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed his "special state-to-state" relationship, and you called the proposal a "pragmatic statement." I ask you now, do you still have this view?
In the year 2000, you proposed the "union theory." In 2001, you advocated "one China with each side having its own interpretation." In 2003, you called for the "one China" issue to be put aside. Which one of these represents your true position?
Everybody knows that, decades before, when the Communist Party and the KMT held talks, the KMT achieved nothing. That's why it had to come to Taiwan. Of course the Communist Party prefers to talk to the KMT. Now we can see all the contradictions and inconsistencies in Mr. Lien's pronouncements. It is he who has nothing concrete to propose. How can he talk with China? How can the people of Taiwan feel at ease?
Chen: Mr. Lien spoke about developing Taiwan. Yet why has the KMT-PFP alliance opposed the DPP administration's new 10 Key Infrastructure Projects?
Lien: Why has the five-year NT$500 billion public construction program not been proposed until now? Some of the ideas within the proposal are good and ones which we would gladly endorse. For instance, the idea of establishing a world-class university and constructing more metropolitan transport services. However, some of the others, such as building a man-made lake as a recreation park and the like are ideas which appear to us to be lacking in detail and planning.
As the opposition party we have the responsibility to guard taxpayers' money and make sure that every last dollar is well spent and not frittered away on projects that hasty and clumsy.
Lien: I don't know why Mr. Chang [Yang] held a meeting with Taiwanese businessmen, but I do know that two years ago he received great praise from President Chen. Mr. Chen is always labeling people, accusing people of having relations with China. What concrete evidence does President Chen have that I have any connections with China?
Chen: Mr Chang is in China on behalf of former Minister of Justice Liao Cheng-hao (
But this is Taiwan's election, not China's. China doesn't even allow the people of Hong Kong or its own people to participate in elections and yet it wants to interfere in ours. There are many Taiwanese criminals hiding in China, all coming out to criticize A-bian [Chen Shui-bian]. And, of course, this is to help get Lien and Soong get elected.
Chen: Would you agree to set up a committee to tackle problems relating to the assets of political parties?
Lien: Many issues can be tackled now by referring to existing laws. There is no need to specially draw up such a law, such as a bill governing disposition of assets improperly obtained by political parties which deliberately targets one person, one party or one issue. This is a way of smearing the KMT.
There is no juridical logic in making the claim that party assets have been acquired through illegal means and then going on to demand proof that one is innocent.
Lien: Mr. Chen keeps saying that hard economic times have passed, but the economic growth rate last year was only 3.15 percent. He says this is a great figure, but the average for Asia was 6 percent, and 5 percent in East Asia. Taiwan came last, after even the Philippines. Mr. Chen says his performance has been terrific, but this is not the way the people see it. How can he be satisfied with 3.15 percent?
Chen: Perhaps Mr. Lien has forgotten that when he was premier, Taiwan's rate of economic growth was second or third among the four "Asian tigers." But we came first among them last year. Although that's not good enough, it's certainly better than during Mr. Lien's time in the administration. Economic growth the year before last was 3.59 percent; better than the US, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore, and the disparity between rich and poor was the best result of the four Asian tigers.
This shows that our economic policies and our hard work, as the people do understand, have not been in vain, although some people like to constantly put Taiwan down. Mr Lien wants to restore 5-percent economic growth and 4-percent unemployment within four years. But if you reelect me, I will achieve this in one year.
Chen: In the 2000 presidential election, James Soong, then a presidential candidate, said that he supported the "one China principle." In 2002 he proposed the idea of a "one China roof" which you lambasted as an act of self-degradation. Now that he has become your running mate in this presidential election, does that mean you now agree with his rhetoric?
Lien: Mr. Chen himself has been inconsistent, changing his stance on cross-strait policy, from "one China" and the cross-strait integration dictum to the EU model to his most recent rhetoric on "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait and his proposals for a referendum and a new constitution.
I stand for both sides of the Strait putting aside the controversy over sovereignty to strive for economic prosperity and the well-being of the people.
My stance is clear, and that is that "one China" means the Republic of China and not the secretive, so-called "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait.
What country are you referring to when you make your claim?
Lien: Mr. Chen keeps glorifying the DPP's achievements, including the construction of the second north-south freeway. In fact, this project was planned under the KMT. Construction has nothing to do with the DPP. Mr. Chen, the road was not built by you and the money was not spent by you. How can you glorify yourself like this? There's also the problem of bad debt. The current bad-debt level is 8.4 percent, though it was only 4.8 percent under the KMT.
Chen: Bad debt is not a problem that develops in the space of a month or a year.
It's a problem that accumulated over 50 years of KMT rule.
Also, everybody knows that there were great discrepancies between KMT plans and KMT actions, resulting in overspending of two to three times the estimated cost of infrastructure projects.
[Lien] should thank us for finishing the second north-south freeway for him and saving the nation NT$2.5 billion.
The DPP is working on many infrastructure projects, which it is completing at a fraction of the cost that the KMT used to spend on such projects.
‘DENIAL DEFENSE’: The US would increase its military presence with uncrewed ships, and submarines, while boosting defense in the Indo-Pacific, a Pete Hegseth memo said The US is reorienting its military strategy to focus primarily on deterring a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a memo signed by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed. The memo also called on Taiwan to increase its defense spending. The document, known as the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance,” was distributed this month and detailed the national defense plans of US President Donald Trump’s administration, an article in the Washington Post said on Saturday. It outlines how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is maintaining close ties with Beijing, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday, hours after a new round of Chinese military drills in the Taiwan Strait began. Political parties in a democracy have a responsibility to be loyal to the nation and defend its sovereignty, DPP spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) told a news conference in Taipei. His comments came hours after Beijing announced via Chinese state media that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command was holding large-scale drills simulating a multi-pronged attack on Taiwan. Contrary to the KMT’s claims that it is staunchly anti-communist, KMT Deputy
RESPONSE: The government would investigate incidents of Taiwanese entertainers in China promoting CCP propaganda online in contravention of the law, the source said Taiwanese entertainers living in China who are found to have contravened cross-strait regulations or collaborated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could be subject to fines, a source said on Sunday. Several Taiwanese entertainers have posted on the social media platform Sina Weibo saying that Taiwan “must be returned” to China, and sharing news articles from Chinese state media. In response, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has asked the Ministry of Culture to investigate whether the entertainers had contravened any laws, and asked for them to be questioned upon their return to Taiwan, an official familiar with the matter said. To curb repeated
Myanmar has turned down an offer of assistance from Taiwanese search-and-rescue teams after a magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck the nation on Friday last week, saying other international aid is sufficient, the National Fire Agency said yesterday. More than 1,700 have been killed and 3,400 injured in the quake that struck near the central Myanmar city of Mandalay early on Friday afternoon, followed minutes later by a magnitude 6.7 aftershock. Worldwide, 13 international search-and-rescue teams have been deployed, with another 13 teams mobilizing, the agency said. Taiwan’s search-and-rescue teams were on standby, but have since been told to stand down, as
RSS