Taipei Times: You are an economist with a strong "localization" consciousness; why did you work at the National Unification Council (NUC)?
Chang Jung-feng (張榮豐): I started to work at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research in 1980. In 1990 then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) asked me to work at the National Security Council. Then Lee said the NUC would soon be set up and that he wanted us to go there. That was the year when the student democracy movement took place in front of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. Lee took the momentum to push for Taiwan's democratization. Many people who worked for him wondered why the NUC should be established at such a time when reforms should take precedence.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO
Lee later explained his thoughts privately and said that martial law was imposed on Taiwan for a long time and cross-strait relations were categorically frozen. But once reforms were undertaken and the walls separating the two sides all torn down, then forces from China might come in to intervene in Taiwan's democratic reform. Therefore, [he thought] there must be a mechanism to keep China's influence away.
Lee said that the function of the NUC would be to set forth various preconditions and restrictions on the development of cross-strait relations.
Unification must be pursued in different stages, but no timetable was designated for each stage. That is, we called for an ultimate unification, but only in the indefinite future.
The NUC, according to Lee, was like a "wire net" that China could see through, but couldn't enter. And even pro-unification advocates would accept such a mechanism.
TT: During the 1996 presidential election, China launched missile exercises and caused tension across the Strait, trying to influence the result of the election. President Lee claimed that he had 18 plans to respond to various scenarios. Were you involved in the drafting of those plans?
Chang: I was involved, but I'd rather not give details of the process of the crisis management. All I can say is that the goals set by the NSC at that time were all achieved. To a certain extent we even turned the situation around and made the crisis a new opportunity for Taiwan to develop international cooperation, such as attracting international media attention and sympathy and expanding substantial relations with neighboring countries which share common interests with Taiwan. Many of the things that were done at that time still have their impact today.
TT: But cross-strait dialogue has since been suspended and pressure for the resumption of talks has mounted within Taiwan. How is the NSC going to resolve the deadlock?
Chang: Many Taiwan media and opposition politicians often fall into China's tactical traps. They put pressure on their own government and spread unwarranted anxiety because of an ostensible standoff and lack of communication mechanism.
The NSC is well aware of Beijing's thoughts. Unless China uses force, Beijing will have no choice but to come to the negotiation table before they can take Taiwan back. So "negotiation" is Beijing's underlying strategy and purposely avoiding negotiation is their tactic.
After the 1996 crisis, in November 1997 China sent an invitation to Chiao Jen-ho (
And when President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) took the presidency in 2000, Beijing took a tough stance and said that it would "listen to his words and observe his deeds." But when the DPP won a landslide victory in last December's legislative election, Beijing then said that it welcomed DPP members to visit the mainland.
It is pretty obvious that Beijing will have to return to its strategy of negotiation to deal with Taiwan. The rejection of talks is just used a means to create friction within Taiwan, but many media and politicians in Taiwan still fall into the trap.
TT: Taiwan may not need to dance to Beijing's tune, but refusing to conduct political negotiations with Beijing doesn't seem to be a viable option, either. How will the NSC prepare for its strategies when both sides sit down for political negotiation?
Chang: It is not that Taiwan cannot sit down for political negotiations with China. But our people should understand that, in a normal negotiation, two "interlocutors" negotiate for "the settlement of an object."
But in cross-strait negotiations, China's strategy is "to treat its interlocutor as the object." That is, it treats Taiwan as the object and negotiates for the "settlement" of Taiwan. In this way, only China will win without making any concessions.
So in the second Koo-Wang talks in Shanghai in 1992, we tried to shift the "object" of the talk from "Taiwan's future" to "China's democratization."
TT: Were you involved in the research of former President Lee Teng-hui's "special state-to-state relations" comments in 1999? How was the crisis resolved then?
Chang: President Lee set up a "unit for strengthening the ROC's sovereignty" at that time. Tsai Ing-wen (
Many members of the unit now are unwilling to admit that they were involved.
Even some of the politicians who were highly supportive of the statement at that time became highly critical of its effect. But I don't agree with them.
I think the "special state-to-state relations" statement had profound significance and history will have a fair judgment on that.
GREAT POWER COMPETITION: Beijing views its military cooperation with Russia as a means to push back against the joint power of the US and its allies, an expert said A recent Sino-Russian joint air patrol conducted over the waters off Alaska was designed to counter the US military in the Pacific and demonstrated improved interoperability between Beijing’s and Moscow’s forces, a national security expert said. National Defense University associate professor Chen Yu-chen (陳育正) made the comment in an article published on Wednesday on the Web site of the Journal of the Chinese Communist Studies Institute. China and Russia sent four strategic bombers to patrol the waters of the northern Pacific and Bering Strait near Alaska in late June, one month after the two nations sent a combined flotilla of four warships
THE TOUR: Pope Francis has gone on a 12-day visit to Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, East Timor and Singapore. He was also invited to Taiwan The government yesterday welcomed Pope Francis to the Asia-Pacific region and said it would continue extending an invitation for him to visit Taiwan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the remarks as Pope Francis began a 12-day tour of the Asia-Pacific on Monday. He is to travel about 33,000km by air to visit Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, East Timor and Singapore, and would arrive back in Rome on Friday next week. It would be the longest and most challenging trip of Francis’ 11-year papacy. The 87-year-old has had health issues over the past few years and now uses a wheelchair. The ministry said
TAIWANESE INNOVATION: The ‘Seawool’ fabric generates about NT$200m a year, with the bulk of it sourced by clothing brands operating in Europe and the US Growing up on Taiwan’s west coast where mollusk farming is popular, Eddie Wang saw discarded oyster shells transformed from waste to function — a memory that inspired him to create a unique and environmentally friendly fabric called “Seawool.” Wang remembered that residents of his seaside hometown of Yunlin County used discarded oyster shells that littered the streets during the harvest as insulation for their homes. “They burned the shells and painted the residue on the walls. The houses then became warm in the winter and cool in the summer,” the 42-year-old said at his factory in Tainan. “So I was
‘LEADERS’: The report highlighted C.C. Wei’s management at TSMC, Lisa Su’s decisionmaking at AMD and the ‘rock star’ status of Nvidia’s Huang Time magazine on Thursday announced its list of the 100 most influential people in artificial intelligence (AI), which included Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家), Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and AMD chair and CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰). The list is divided into four categories: Leaders, Innovators, Shapers and Thinkers. Wei and Huang were named in the Leaders category. Other notable figures in the Leaders category included Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Meta CEO and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Su was listed in the Innovators category. Time highlighted Wei’s