Taipei Times: You are an economist with a strong "localization" consciousness; why did you work at the National Unification Council (NUC)?
Chang Jung-feng (張榮豐): I started to work at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research in 1980. In 1990 then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) asked me to work at the National Security Council. Then Lee said the NUC would soon be set up and that he wanted us to go there. That was the year when the student democracy movement took place in front of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. Lee took the momentum to push for Taiwan's democratization. Many people who worked for him wondered why the NUC should be established at such a time when reforms should take precedence.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO
Lee later explained his thoughts privately and said that martial law was imposed on Taiwan for a long time and cross-strait relations were categorically frozen. But once reforms were undertaken and the walls separating the two sides all torn down, then forces from China might come in to intervene in Taiwan's democratic reform. Therefore, [he thought] there must be a mechanism to keep China's influence away.
Lee said that the function of the NUC would be to set forth various preconditions and restrictions on the development of cross-strait relations.
Unification must be pursued in different stages, but no timetable was designated for each stage. That is, we called for an ultimate unification, but only in the indefinite future.
The NUC, according to Lee, was like a "wire net" that China could see through, but couldn't enter. And even pro-unification advocates would accept such a mechanism.
TT: During the 1996 presidential election, China launched missile exercises and caused tension across the Strait, trying to influence the result of the election. President Lee claimed that he had 18 plans to respond to various scenarios. Were you involved in the drafting of those plans?
Chang: I was involved, but I'd rather not give details of the process of the crisis management. All I can say is that the goals set by the NSC at that time were all achieved. To a certain extent we even turned the situation around and made the crisis a new opportunity for Taiwan to develop international cooperation, such as attracting international media attention and sympathy and expanding substantial relations with neighboring countries which share common interests with Taiwan. Many of the things that were done at that time still have their impact today.
TT: But cross-strait dialogue has since been suspended and pressure for the resumption of talks has mounted within Taiwan. How is the NSC going to resolve the deadlock?
Chang: Many Taiwan media and opposition politicians often fall into China's tactical traps. They put pressure on their own government and spread unwarranted anxiety because of an ostensible standoff and lack of communication mechanism.
The NSC is well aware of Beijing's thoughts. Unless China uses force, Beijing will have no choice but to come to the negotiation table before they can take Taiwan back. So "negotiation" is Beijing's underlying strategy and purposely avoiding negotiation is their tactic.
After the 1996 crisis, in November 1997 China sent an invitation to Chiao Jen-ho (
And when President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) took the presidency in 2000, Beijing took a tough stance and said that it would "listen to his words and observe his deeds." But when the DPP won a landslide victory in last December's legislative election, Beijing then said that it welcomed DPP members to visit the mainland.
It is pretty obvious that Beijing will have to return to its strategy of negotiation to deal with Taiwan. The rejection of talks is just used a means to create friction within Taiwan, but many media and politicians in Taiwan still fall into the trap.
TT: Taiwan may not need to dance to Beijing's tune, but refusing to conduct political negotiations with Beijing doesn't seem to be a viable option, either. How will the NSC prepare for its strategies when both sides sit down for political negotiation?
Chang: It is not that Taiwan cannot sit down for political negotiations with China. But our people should understand that, in a normal negotiation, two "interlocutors" negotiate for "the settlement of an object."
But in cross-strait negotiations, China's strategy is "to treat its interlocutor as the object." That is, it treats Taiwan as the object and negotiates for the "settlement" of Taiwan. In this way, only China will win without making any concessions.
So in the second Koo-Wang talks in Shanghai in 1992, we tried to shift the "object" of the talk from "Taiwan's future" to "China's democratization."
TT: Were you involved in the research of former President Lee Teng-hui's "special state-to-state relations" comments in 1999? How was the crisis resolved then?
Chang: President Lee set up a "unit for strengthening the ROC's sovereignty" at that time. Tsai Ing-wen (
Many members of the unit now are unwilling to admit that they were involved.
Even some of the politicians who were highly supportive of the statement at that time became highly critical of its effect. But I don't agree with them.
I think the "special state-to-state relations" statement had profound significance and history will have a fair judgment on that.
‘DENIAL DEFENSE’: The US would increase its military presence with uncrewed ships, and submarines, while boosting defense in the Indo-Pacific, a Pete Hegseth memo said The US is reorienting its military strategy to focus primarily on deterring a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a memo signed by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed. The memo also called on Taiwan to increase its defense spending. The document, known as the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance,” was distributed this month and detailed the national defense plans of US President Donald Trump’s administration, an article in the Washington Post said on Saturday. It outlines how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama
A wild live dugong was found in Taiwan for the first time in 88 years, after it was accidentally caught by a fisher’s net on Tuesday in Yilan County’s Fenniaolin (粉鳥林). This is the first sighting of the species in Taiwan since 1937, having already been considered “extinct” in the country and considered as “vulnerable” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. A fisher surnamed Chen (陳) went to Fenniaolin to collect the fish in his netting, but instead caught a 3m long, 500kg dugong. The fisher released the animal back into the wild, not realizing it was an endangered species at
The High Prosecutors’ Office yesterday withdrew an appeal against the acquittal of a former bank manager 22 years after his death, marking Taiwan’s first instance of prosecutors rendering posthumous justice to a wrongfully convicted defendant. Chu Ching-en (諸慶恩) — formerly a manager at the Taipei branch of BNP Paribas — was in 1999 accused by Weng Mao-chung (翁茂鍾), then-president of Chia Her Industrial Co, of forging a request for a fixed deposit of US$10 million by I-Hwa Industrial Co, a subsidiary of Chia Her, which was used as collateral. Chu was ruled not guilty in the first trial, but was found guilty
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is maintaining close ties with Beijing, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday, hours after a new round of Chinese military drills in the Taiwan Strait began. Political parties in a democracy have a responsibility to be loyal to the nation and defend its sovereignty, DPP spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) told a news conference in Taipei. His comments came hours after Beijing announced via Chinese state media that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command was holding large-scale drills simulating a multi-pronged attack on Taiwan. Contrary to the KMT’s claims that it is staunchly anti-communist, KMT Deputy
RSS