Taipei Times: You are an economist with a strong "localization" consciousness; why did you work at the National Unification Council (NUC)?
Chang Jung-feng (張榮豐): I started to work at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research in 1980. In 1990 then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) asked me to work at the National Security Council. Then Lee said the NUC would soon be set up and that he wanted us to go there. That was the year when the student democracy movement took place in front of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. Lee took the momentum to push for Taiwan's democratization. Many people who worked for him wondered why the NUC should be established at such a time when reforms should take precedence.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO
Lee later explained his thoughts privately and said that martial law was imposed on Taiwan for a long time and cross-strait relations were categorically frozen. But once reforms were undertaken and the walls separating the two sides all torn down, then forces from China might come in to intervene in Taiwan's democratic reform. Therefore, [he thought] there must be a mechanism to keep China's influence away.
Lee said that the function of the NUC would be to set forth various preconditions and restrictions on the development of cross-strait relations.
Unification must be pursued in different stages, but no timetable was designated for each stage. That is, we called for an ultimate unification, but only in the indefinite future.
The NUC, according to Lee, was like a "wire net" that China could see through, but couldn't enter. And even pro-unification advocates would accept such a mechanism.
TT: During the 1996 presidential election, China launched missile exercises and caused tension across the Strait, trying to influence the result of the election. President Lee claimed that he had 18 plans to respond to various scenarios. Were you involved in the drafting of those plans?
Chang: I was involved, but I'd rather not give details of the process of the crisis management. All I can say is that the goals set by the NSC at that time were all achieved. To a certain extent we even turned the situation around and made the crisis a new opportunity for Taiwan to develop international cooperation, such as attracting international media attention and sympathy and expanding substantial relations with neighboring countries which share common interests with Taiwan. Many of the things that were done at that time still have their impact today.
TT: But cross-strait dialogue has since been suspended and pressure for the resumption of talks has mounted within Taiwan. How is the NSC going to resolve the deadlock?
Chang: Many Taiwan media and opposition politicians often fall into China's tactical traps. They put pressure on their own government and spread unwarranted anxiety because of an ostensible standoff and lack of communication mechanism.
The NSC is well aware of Beijing's thoughts. Unless China uses force, Beijing will have no choice but to come to the negotiation table before they can take Taiwan back. So "negotiation" is Beijing's underlying strategy and purposely avoiding negotiation is their tactic.
After the 1996 crisis, in November 1997 China sent an invitation to Chiao Jen-ho (
And when President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) took the presidency in 2000, Beijing took a tough stance and said that it would "listen to his words and observe his deeds." But when the DPP won a landslide victory in last December's legislative election, Beijing then said that it welcomed DPP members to visit the mainland.
It is pretty obvious that Beijing will have to return to its strategy of negotiation to deal with Taiwan. The rejection of talks is just used a means to create friction within Taiwan, but many media and politicians in Taiwan still fall into the trap.
TT: Taiwan may not need to dance to Beijing's tune, but refusing to conduct political negotiations with Beijing doesn't seem to be a viable option, either. How will the NSC prepare for its strategies when both sides sit down for political negotiation?
Chang: It is not that Taiwan cannot sit down for political negotiations with China. But our people should understand that, in a normal negotiation, two "interlocutors" negotiate for "the settlement of an object."
But in cross-strait negotiations, China's strategy is "to treat its interlocutor as the object." That is, it treats Taiwan as the object and negotiates for the "settlement" of Taiwan. In this way, only China will win without making any concessions.
So in the second Koo-Wang talks in Shanghai in 1992, we tried to shift the "object" of the talk from "Taiwan's future" to "China's democratization."
TT: Were you involved in the research of former President Lee Teng-hui's "special state-to-state relations" comments in 1999? How was the crisis resolved then?
Chang: President Lee set up a "unit for strengthening the ROC's sovereignty" at that time. Tsai Ing-wen (
Many members of the unit now are unwilling to admit that they were involved.
Even some of the politicians who were highly supportive of the statement at that time became highly critical of its effect. But I don't agree with them.
I think the "special state-to-state relations" statement had profound significance and history will have a fair judgment on that.
An essay competition jointly organized by a local writing society and a publisher affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might have contravened the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said on Thursday. “In this case, the partner organization is clearly an agency under the CCP’s Fujian Provincial Committee,” MAC Deputy Minister and spokesperson Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) said at a news briefing in Taipei. “It also involves bringing Taiwanese students to China with all-expenses-paid arrangements to attend award ceremonies and camps,” Liang said. Those two “characteristics” are typically sufficient
A magnitude 5.9 earthquake that struck about 33km off the coast of Hualien City was the "main shock" in a series of quakes in the area, with aftershocks expected over the next three days, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Prior to the magnitude 5.9 quake shaking most of Taiwan at 6:53pm yesterday, six other earthquakes stronger than a magnitude of 4, starting with a magnitude 5.5 quake at 6:09pm, occurred in the area. CWA Seismological Center Director Wu Chien-fu (吳健富) confirmed that the quakes were all part of the same series and that the magnitude 5.5 temblor was
The brilliant blue waters, thick foliage and bucolic atmosphere on this seemingly idyllic archipelago deep in the Pacific Ocean belie the key role it now plays in a titanic geopolitical struggle. Palau is again on the front line as China, and the US and its allies prepare their forces in an intensifying contest for control over the Asia-Pacific region. The democratic nation of just 17,000 people hosts US-controlled airstrips and soon-to-be-completed radar installations that the US military describes as “critical” to monitoring vast swathes of water and airspace. It is also a key piece of the second island chain, a string of
The Central Weather Administration has issued a heat alert for southeastern Taiwan, warning of temperatures as high as 36°C today, while alerting some coastal areas of strong winds later in the day. Kaohsiung’s Neimen District (內門) and Pingtung County’s Neipu Township (內埔) are under an orange heat alert, which warns of temperatures as high as 36°C for three consecutive days, the CWA said, citing southwest winds. The heat would also extend to Tainan’s Nansi (楠西) and Yujing (玉井) districts, as well as Pingtung’s Gaoshu (高樹), Yanpu (鹽埔) and Majia (瑪家) townships, it said, forecasting highs of up to 36°C in those areas
RSS