Raymond F. Burghardt, the Taipei director of the American Institute in Taiwan, said yesterday that the US government has confidence that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have the creativity to resolve the cross-strait issue on their own -- without "American mediation."
"The two sides haven't said the same thing. They haven't used the same language. But finding a formula that they can use to talk doesn't look impossible," Burghardt said during a speech at the annual plenary meeting of the Society for Strategic Studies, ROC.
The occasion also marked the first public speech regarding cross-strait issues by Burghardt -- the de-facto US ambassador in Taiwan -- following the March 18 presidential election.
"The good news so far is that neither side has ruled out the possibility of being able to talk with each other," Burghardt said.
Burghardt declined to comment, however, on President-elect Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) insistence that "one China" be regarded as an "issue" to be brought up in talks with Beijing.
China has insisted instead that its definition of "one-China" should be the basis -- the bottom line -- for dialogue.
"I don't think it is appropriate or useful for me to comment on whose "one China" formula is best. We don't mediate this. We have been careful not to take a position on the policy of each side, in terms of how to deal with each other," Burghardt said.
"It [would be] arrogant for the US to comment on what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for dialogue between Taipei and Beijing," Burghardt said.
He also highlighted the idea of "no American mediation" as one of the principles of US policy concerning issues in the Taiwan Strait, which have evolved over the last 21 years on the basis of Taiwan Relations Act.
Wei Jung (魏鏞), a former KMT lawmaker and a political analyst at the Vanguard Foundation, said Burghardt's refusal to comment on "one-China" as an issue or as a principle could suggest US policy is changing.
"We know very well that the US government always says it follows Beijing's `one China' policy in handling cross-strait issues. But if the US does not want to define it as an issue or as a principle, the message is there," Wei said.
Burghardt also called attention to the security relationship between Taiwan and the US, which he said was closer than what their official ties can actually allow.
"One of the things I have learned since I have been here is that the security relationship is actually very strong and very good. We have good cooperation. And something that we work on everyday is one of my most important responsibilities," he said.
"Over the past 20 years, the US has viewed our security program as one of the most important aspects of our relationship with Taiwan. At AIT, I consider it to be one of the key reasons why our office is here," he said.
Although US naval warships no longer patrol the Taiwan Strait, the territory of the US navy is still pretty large, covering the entire Pacific region, he said.
US security policy, he emphasized, toward Taiwan and the entire Asia-Pacific region is not just a question of "military strength."
"There are political, economic, and social aspects that are just as important, or perhaps more important, than military hardware in maintaining the peace and in resolving differences," he added.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS