A small tropical reef fish was able to recognize itself in a mirror, scientists said on Feb. 7 in a finding that raises provocative questions about assessing self-awareness and cognitive abilities in animals.
The study involved experiments in which the fish species Labroides dimidiatus, called the bluestreak cleaner wrasse, was given a mirror self-recognition test, a technique developed in 1970 for gauging animal self-awareness.
In aquarium experiments at Osaka City University in Japan, the researchers applied a brown-colored mark on the fish’s body in a place that could be seen only in a mirror reflection. The fish tried to remove the marks by scraping their bodies on hard surfaces after watching themselves in a mirror, but never tried to remove them without a mirror present, indicating they understood the reflection was of them, the researchers said. When a transparent, rather than brown, mark was applied, the fish never tried to remove it.
Photo: Reuters
照片：路透
The 10-cm species consumes parasites and dead tissue off skin of other reef fish in a symbiotic relationship. The brown mark’s color resembled the color of these parasites. The fish “shows behaviors during the mirror test that are accepted as evidence for self-awareness in many other species,” said evolutionary biologist Alex Jordan of the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Germany, who led the study published in the journal PLOS Biology.
Jordan, however, questioned whether the test represents a reliable measure of animal cognitive abilities. “I don’t claim that fish lack self-awareness, but rather that the minimal required explanation for the behaviors we observe in the mirror test does not require invocation of self-awareness, self-consciousness, or theory of mind,” Jordan said.
The test has been passed by great apes including chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans as well as dolphins, killer whales, an elephant and a magpie species, but failed by some other animals. Humans pass it at around 18 months old. “I consider that there is a spectrum of animal consciousness, with some animals, likely primates, showing abilities closer to human consciousness,” Jordan said. “My point with this paper is not that fish are as smart as chimpanzees, but that the way we ask that very question across taxa (animal groups) needs to be re-evaluated.”
University at Albany evolutionary psychologist Gordon Gallup, who pioneered the mirror test, called the new study “not methodologically sound” and faulted the researchers for a “zeal to undermine the integrity” of the technique to appraise animal self-awareness. Emory University primatologist Frans de Waal, who has studied mirror self-recognition in mammals, called the findings “interesting and provocative.” “The hope is that this study will throw open the discussion about self-awareness in animals. Instead of the black-and-white distinction we have had thus far, that some animals have it and most of them don’t, we need to develop a more gradualist perspective,” de Waal said.
(Reuters)
科學家於二月七日指出，一種小型熱帶珊瑚礁魚類能夠辨認出自己在鏡中的倒影。該研究對於評估動物的自我意識和認知能力，提出發人深省的問題。
這份研究的實驗對象是一種學名為Labroides dimidiatus的魚類，俗稱清潔魚或是藍帶裂唇鯛，科學家對其進行鏡像自我認知測試。這項測試方式發展於一九七○年，是用於判斷動物自我意識的技術。
於日本大阪市立大學進行的水族箱實驗中，研究人員在魚身塗上一塊褐色的記號，位置只能在鏡像中看到。這些魚在鏡中看到自己之後，便藉由在堅硬表面上摩擦身體，試圖抹除掉記號，但這類行為從來不曾發生在沒有鏡子的情況下。研究人員表示，這顯示魚類了解倒影是它們自己的。另外，如果塗上的記號是透明而非褐色的話，這些魚則不曾試圖抹掉。
這種魚類身長十公分，攝食其他珊瑚礁魚類身上的寄生蟲，以及從其他魚身表面剝落的壞死組織，形成彼此互惠的關係。科學家塗上的褐色記號，採用接近寄生蟲的顏色。這篇研究發表於期刊《公共科學圖書館：生物學》，由德國馬克斯普朗克鳥類學研究所的演化生物學家亞歷克斯‧喬丹主持，他表示這種魚「在鏡像測試過程中表現出的行為，在其他許多物種身上會被認可，視為表現自我意識的證據。」
不過，喬丹也懷疑此項測驗是否足以作為動物認知能力的可靠衡量方式。他表示：「我並不是宣稱魚類缺乏自我意識，反而應該是說，我們在鏡像測驗中觀察到的行為，所須最低限度的解釋並不需要訴諸自我意識、自覺、或是心智理論。」
包括黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩，以及紅毛猩猩等大型猿類都曾通過此項測驗，其他通過的動物也包括海豚、虎鯨、一頭大象和一種喜鵲，然而有些動物卻未能通過這項測驗。人類大約在十八個月大時通過測驗。喬丹表示：「我認為動物意識可以視為一個光譜，其中有些動物，例如靈長類，展現出的能力較為接近人類的自我意識。」他進一步指出：「我在這篇論文想要表達的論點並不是說魚類跟黑猩猩一樣聰明，而是我們對整個分類階層（動物族群）提出此問題的方式需要重新評估。」
紐約州立大學奧爾巴尼分校的演化心理學家戈登‧蓋洛普是鏡像測試的先驅，他認為這份新研究「在研究方法上並不健全」，並歸咎於研究人員為了評估動物的自我意識，「熱切想要顛覆該技術的公正性」。埃默里大學的靈長類動物學家法蘭茲‧德瓦爾長期研究哺乳類動物的鏡像自我認知，他認為這份研究「饒富趣味且引發思辯」。德瓦爾表示：「希望這份研究可以開啟關於動物自我意識的討論。與其沿用我們目前非黑即白的區別方式—也就是認定某些動物具有自我意識，而絕大部分則沒有—我們需要發展出一個較為漸進主義式的視角。」
（台北時報章厚明譯）
US President Donald Trump has renewed his ambition to take control of Greenland for national security reasons and questioned whether Denmark has any legal right to the Arctic island. The debate has revived scrutiny of how Greenland became part of Denmark, its current self-rule and path to independence, and Washington’s military footprint. HOW DID DENMARK GET GREENLAND? Greenland was inhabited by Inuit peoples from Asia and North America intermittently from around 2,500 BC. Around 985 AD, Vikings led by Erik the Red settled in southern Greenland, farming and building churches. Around the same time, ancestors of today’s Inuit arrived, living as hunters
A: Bloomberg just released its annual travel guide, titled “25 Best Places to Travel in 2026.” What were the best Asian destinations? B: There were actually six Asian hotspots: Taiwan’s Taipei, Malaysia’s Penang, Kazakhstan’s Almaty, Indonesia’s Rote Island, India’s Tiger Reserves, and Oman. A: With its mix of traditional food and modern cuisine, Taipei has become a rising food capital in Asia. B: As Bloomberg reported, “Taiwan is a place that bubbles up in culinary conversation because of its famed beverage, bubble tea, and its early adoption of modern night markets.” A: And Din Tai Fung has now
Owls have long fascinated people with their distinctive appearance and mysterious habits. These nocturnal birds possess large, round eyes and a flat facial disc. Their feathers come in shades of brown, gray, or white, helping them blend easily into the darkness. The most remarkable trait of owls is that they can turn their heads without damaging blood vessels. Contrary to popular belief, they can only rotate their heads up to 270 degrees, not 360 degrees. Owls have 14 cervical vertebrae, which is twice as many as humans. This special physical structure compensates for their inability to move their eyes within their
1. 展出的是幾幅張大千的名畫。 ˇ There are some masterpieces painted by Chang Dai-chien on exhibition. χ There are some masterpieces painting by Chang Dai-chien on exhibition. 註：現在分詞 painting 表明主動的或未完成的動作，這裏必須用過去分詞。現代英語裡，正句裡的 painted 一字，往往略去。若將 painting 視為名詞，則應加s — paintings. 2. 書前面有簡短的序言。 ˇ There is a short foreword preceding the book. χ There is a short foreword preceded the book. 註：precede 作「在……之前」解。a short foreword 是放在述詞後的主詞，應用現在分詞 preceding 表明主動的動作，句義與 There is a short foreword which precedes the book. 相同。 3. 你知道昨天發生的事故有誰在裡面嗎？ ˇ Do you know anyone who was in the accident that happened yesterday? χ Do you know anyone who was in the accident happened yesterday? 註：錯句中的 happened 是過去分詞，一般過去分詞形式有被動的意義，但 happen 是不及物動詞，不能用作被動形式。若用現在分詞 happening 則表示未完成的動作，與中文原意不合。 請參考下列例句： 我上個月發表的有關創造力的文章，你讀過沒？ ˇ Have you read my article about
RSS