US President Donald Trump on Friday announced the US will impose a comprehensive set of trade tariffs on Chinese imports — estimated to amount to at least US$50billion — following an investigation by US government agency, Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) into intellectual property theft by China.
In addition to the imposition of 25 percent duties on targeted Chinese products, Trump also instructed US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to impose new investment restrictions to prevent Chinese companies from acquiring strategically important US technologies.
The investigation, which commenced in August last year, found China uses joint venture conditions, foreign investment restrictions, and administrative review and licensing processes to force or pressure technology transfers from American companies.
Photo: Reuters
照片：路透
The USTR also found that China directs and facilitates investments and acquisitions which generate large-scale technology transfers and conducts and supports cyber intrusions into US computer networks to gain access to valuable business information.
Prior to the announcement, Wei Jianguo, executive deputy director of a Beijing think tank, China Center for International Economic Exchanges, used robust language: “If Trump really signs the order, it is a declaration of trade war with China.” Wei continued: “China is not afraid, nor will it dodge a trade war. We have plenty of measures with which to fight back, in areas of automobile imports, soybean, aircraft and chips. Trump should know this is a very bad idea, and there will be no winner, and that there will be no good outcome for either nation.”
Following the imposition of the tariffs, China unveiled reciprocal tariffs on approximately US$3billion of US imports ranging from pork, recycled aluminum, steel pipes, fruit and wine.
Photo courtesy of United States Information Agency /Wikimedia Commons
照片：美國新聞署/維基共享資源
“The US declared a trade war, but China is acting quite restrained. The list that China has announced appears to be a retaliation, but still it is very measured,” said Li Yong, senior fellow of China Association of International Trade, quoted by Bloomberg. “The move sends a message that China is able to fight back, but we still want a trade peace instead of a trade war,” said Li.
(Edward Jones, Taipei Times)
美國總統川普週五宣布，美國將對中國進口商品課徵全面性關稅，預估金額將超過五百億美元。這項決定奠基於美國政府機構──美國貿易代表署──日前針對中國從美國竊取智慧財產所展開的調查。
除了對特定中國產品課徵百分之二十五的關稅之外，川普同時指示美國財政部長梅努欽制定新的投資限制，以防制中國公司收購美國具戰略重要性的科技。
美國貿易代表署從去年八月開始進行調查，發現中國利用合資企業條件、外國投資限制等方式，並且藉由行政審核與授權程序等手段，強迫或是向美國公司施壓，要求對方進行技術轉移。
美國貿易代表署同時發現，中國透過主導和促使國內公司進行投資與併購，進而產生大規模的技術轉移，並主導和支援發動網路攻擊行動，入侵美國的電腦網路系統，以獲取珍貴的商業資訊。
在川普宣布這項決議之前，北京智庫中國國際經濟交流中心副理事長魏建國強硬地表態：「川普若真簽署命令，等同宣告中美貿易戰開打。」魏建國進一步表示：「中國不會害怕，也不會迴避貿易戰爭。在汽車進口、大豆、飛機和晶片等方面，我們有許多反制措施。此外，川普應該曉得這是非常糟糕的想法，也不會有贏家，對兩國來說都是有害而無益。」
在美國宣布課徵關稅後，中國緊接著揭露報復性的關稅措施，預估將對美國進口商品──範圍從豬肉、回收鋁製品、鋼管、乃至於水果與酒類──課徵大約三十億美元的關稅。
據彭博社報導，中國國際貿易學會的資深研究員李永指出：「美國此舉宣示貿易戰開打，但中國的行動非常節制。中國公布課徵關稅的貨物清單，看起來像是報復，其實仍是斟酌後的結果」。李永表示：「這個舉動是為了要傳達一個訊息，那就是中國仍有能力反擊，但我們要的並不是貿易戰爭，而是一個平和的貿易環境。」
（台北時報章厚明譯）
Follow up
讀後練習
Reading Comprehension
The current US-China trade war is not the first time protectionist trade measures have been adopted by the US — but will it work and how could it affect the global economy?
Perhaps the most famous example of a trade war is the series of reciprocal protectionist trade policies which were adopted by many countries during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Following the Wall Street Crash of 1929, the US Senate passed the Tariff Act of 1930, commonly known as the Smoot–Hawley Tariff, which raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods. Other countries soon retaliated with boycotts of US goods and reciprocal tariffs against US products.
Although the tariff initially appeared to be a success, between 1929 to 1933 US exports decreased 61 percent from US$5.4billion to US$2.1billion and unemployment in the US jumped from 8 percent in 1930 to 16 percent in 1931, and reached 25 percent by 1933.
Meanwhile, US tariffs forced Canada, France and Britain to forge closer economic links which each other and develop new trading partners, while Germany pursued a system of autarky (economic self-sufficiency), resulting in an overall reduction in global trade.
However, economists disagree to what extent protectionism was responsible for worsening the Great Depression. US economist Paul Krugman has argued that the Tariff Act exacerbated the Great Depression by preventing a recovery in trade after production had recovered. However, another US economist, Milton Friedman, attributed the Great Depression to severe monetary contraction caused by a banking crisis and poor policy making by the Federal Reserve.
Questions
1. Why did US President Donald Trump decide to impose tariffs on Chinese goods? Was he justified in doing so?
2. Do you think it is possible that the US-China trade war could escalate out of control and cause a new Great Depression?
3. If you were the US president, would you have handled the situation any differently? If so, how?
(Edward Jones, Taipei Times)
Many consumers are guilty of filling drawers or closets with old laptops, cellphones, fitness trackers and other electronic devices once they are no longer needed. It’s hard to know where to recycle such items, or it seems costly and inconvenient to do so. The world generates millions of tons of electronic waste — also called e-waste — each year. According to the UN’s most recent estimate, people worldwide produced 62 million metric tons of e-waste in 2022, and only about 22 percent of it was properly recycled. The US’ Environmental Protection Agency estimates that less than a quarter of e-waste is
You’re sitting in class when a classmate asks to borrow a pencil. It seems like a small favor, so you agree without hesitation. The following week, the same classmate asks to share your notes. Later, they request help with a group project. You agree each time — after all, you helped out the first time — but before you know it, it has become automatic. This scenario demonstrates the “foot-in-the-door technique,” a psychological concept that shows how agreeing to small, acceptable demands makes it easier to accept larger ones later on. The name for this strategy comes from door-to-door
A: The four-day Tomb Sweeping Day long weekend begins Friday and will run until Monday. Are you going to sweep your ancestors’ tombs? B: I did in advance last weekend, so I can go to Kaohsiung to see the musical “The Phantom of the Opera.” A: Wow, is “Phantom” touring Taiwan again? It debuted in 1986, so this year marks the 40th anniversary of the show. B: And it’s not just touring Kaohsiung starting March 31, but also Taipei starting April 21 and Taichung starting May 26. A: “Phantom” is one of the world’s Four Major Musicals. I’ve seen all of them, except “Les
Continued from yesterday（延續自昨日） https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang Gig Tripping “Gig tripping” combines concerts with travel. People fly to see their favorite artists perform — usually abroad—and spend a few days sightseeing before or after the show. While die-hard fans have done this since the 1960s, the post-pandemic travel boom changed the game. Even people who aren’t superfans are now booking international concert trips because they want to make the most of travel opportunities. This trend exploded in the US, as the math makes sense. Domestic concert tickets are so costly that flying abroad for the show plus tourism expenses often matches or even beats the price
RSS